Top 10 in Law Blogs: Pandora, Title VII, and Law Students

Back at it on another Monday. Thankfully here in Seattle it’s a bit cooler this week than the heat wave we had last week; with any luck those of you outside Seattle are seeing some of the same. Over on LXBN we’ve got our Monday Quick Hits series up, so be sure to check there if you need a bit of blogging inspiration. And now for some top 10 blogging inspiration:

• Users of Pandora’s Free Service Are Not Customers Under Michigan Privacy Statute, But Questions Remain – New York lawyer Adrian Perry of Covington & Burling on their Inside Privacy
• State of Cannabis: New Jersey – Harris Moure’s Daniel Shortt writing from Seattle on the firm’s Canna Law Blog
• 7th Circuit Holds Title VII Does Not Cover Sexual Orientation – Philadelphia attorney Brian McGinnis from Fox Rothschild writing on the firm’s Employment Discrimination Report
• Brexit: a play in four acts? – Hogan Lovells attorney Andrew Eaton writing from London on the firm’s Focus on Regulation blog
• Why is the SEC Investigating Tesla Motors? – Uniondale lawyer Alon Y. Kapen from Farrell Fritz writing on their New York Venture Hub
• Tough Choices for Mississippi College – Jackson solo practitioner Philip Thomas writing on his MS Litigation Review and Commentary blog
• You Cannot Create A Restrictive Covenant Out of Thin Air – Jacksonville attorney Kevin Hyde of Foley & Lardner writing on the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
• Enforcing US Judgements in China. Not Yet. – Seattle lawyer Dan Harris of Harris Moure writing on their China Law Blog
• FTC Plants A Flag With LabMD Ruling: What This Means for Enforcement – Boston lawyers Cyntha Larose and Natalie Prescott from Mintz Levin writing on the firm’s Privacy & Security Matters
• Remembering Four Years Ago, Will Tax Reform Come out of This Lame Duck Session of Congress? – Nutter attorney Julia Satti Cosentino writing on the firm’s Generation to Generation blog