Top 10 in Law Blogs: Antrel Rolle, Intent to Harm, and Pom
And we’re back at it again—the top 10. We’ve got the latest installment in our LXBN Leaders series over on LXBN; focusing on the Foley & Lardner team behind Labor & Employment Law Perspectives. Now let’s get to our list:
- U.S. Department of Justice threatens NC over HB 2 – Winston-Salem attorney Robin E. Shea from Constangy Brooks, Smith & Prophete on her Employment & Labor Insider
- Antrel Rolle Should File For Workers’ Compensation Benefits – Solo practitioner Mike Helfand writing from Illinois on his Illinois Workers Compensation Law Blog
- Lawyers on hot seat after using paralegal to friend opposing party – Cleveland lawyer Karen Rubin of Thompson Hine on the firm’s The Law for Lawyers Today
- Cannabis Franchising vs. Trademark Licensing: Get it Right or Face the Consequences – Harris Moure attorney Alison Malsbury writing from Seattle on their Canna Law Blog
- Are Drug Prices Really Too High? – Washington, D.C. lawyer Simon J. Elliott of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s PharmaPatents blog
- What Monitoring Technology Allows, the Law May Prohibit – New York attorney Gregg Settembrino of Epstein Becker Green writing on their Technology Employment Law
- Second Circuit: Intent to Harm is Not Required for Criminal Conviction Under Investment Adivsers Act – Proskauer lawyers Jonathan Richman and Rachel Wolkinson on the firm’s Corporate Defense and Disputes blog
- Monitoring Employee Communications: A Brave New World – Seyfarth Shaw lawyer Karla Grossenbacher writing from Washington, D.C. on the firm’s Employment Law Lookout
- Another Pom Case – Winthrop & Weinstine lawyer David Pabian writing from Minneapolis on their DuetsBlog
- Ninth Circuit Roundly Supports Time Punch Rounding – Seyfarth Shaw attorneys Hillary J. Massey and Kerry Friedrichs on their Wage & Hour Litigation Blog
Posted in: