December 9, 2014
In the big legal news of the day—at least on our network—the Supreme Court ruled that post-work security screenings are not covered by the FLSA. Doug Hass has some great insight on that, as does Michael Kun. Total posts on the LexBlog Network today: 160.
- Unanimous Supreme Court Rules Employer Need Not Pay for Worker Security Screenings: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk – Chicago lawyer Doug Hass of Franczek Radelet on his blog, Wage & Hour Insights
- Supreme Court Holds That Time Spent in Security Screening Is Not Compensable Time – Los Angeles lawyer Michael Kun of EpsteinBeckerGreen on the firm’s blog, Wage & Hour Defense
- Celebrities’ Health Information Compromised by Sony Hacking – Princeton, NJ lawyer Elizabeth Litten of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, HIPAA, HITECH & HIT
- Obama’s Executive Actions on Immigration to Affect the Hiring and Retention of Highly Skilled Foreign Employees – Birmingham lawyer Keith Covington of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings on the firm’s blog, Labor & Employment Insights
- NIST Issues Update on Cybersecurity Framework, Highlights Priorities Moving Forward – Harriet Pearson and Paul Otto of Hogan Lovells on the firm’s blog, Chronicle of Data Protection
- A Metric for Getting Work Done Complete and On Time – Kenneth Grady of Seyfarth Shaw for the firm’s blog, SeytLines
- On the First Day of Privacy, the EU Gave to Santa…… – Boston lawyer Cynthia LaRose of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Privacy & Security Matters
- Success: Are You Motivated Enough to Get Through “the Grind?” – Dallas, Texas lawyer coach Cordell Parvin on the Cordell Parvin Blog
- Companies Slow to Get CyberInsurance Coverage Even as CyberAttacks Increase – Dallas lawyer Peter Vogel on his Internet, Information Technology & e-Discovery Blog
- Your Story is Your Only Hope – So start listening to Serial on PBS – Boise attorney Chuck Peterson on Peterson Law Offices’ Idaho Criminal Defense Blog
For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network.
Posted in: