LexBlog Network Law Roundup – 5/20/09

Okay, it appears as though things are really back to normal after power outages at the data center. Today, the batch of posts include what to expect from a divorce of the always interesting ‘Jon & Kate Plus 8’ couple, the accuracy of fingerprints and the potential for sabotage.

• California appellate court weighs in on the limits of estate planning malpractice liability – Miami lawyer Juan Antunez of Stokes McMillan Maracini & Antunez in his Florida Probate & Trust Litigation Blog
• Alabama Woman Accused of Murder-For-Hire Plot Awaits Appeal – Birmingham attorney Steven Eversole on his Birmingham Criminal Defense Blog
• Are you safe from sabotage? – New Jersey lawyer Anne Bancroft of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog Managing Work Force Reductions
• How accurate are fingerprints? – Waco attorney Walter Reaves in his Texas Criminal Law Blog
• Legislative Update: Conn. House Approves Bill Banning Use of Credit Reports for Employment Decisions – Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog
• Preliminary Injunction against Publication and Dissemination of Documents Received in Public Records Request Violates First Amendment – David Bowerman of K&L Gates on the firm’s Electronic Discovery Law blog
• Why Shouldn’t You Rely on Certificates of Insurance As Proof of Additional Insured Coverage? – Chicago attorney Ashley Brandt of Foran Glennon Palandech & Ponzi on the firm’s Illinois Construction Law Blog
• Supreme Court Issues Decision in AT&T v. Hulteen – Columbus lawyer Jaime Powell of Porter Wright on the firm’s Employer Law Report
• Jon & Kate Plus 8…Plus 1: What to Expect Under Pennsylvania Law if They Divorce – Yardley attorney Joseph Visco of Stark & Stark on the firm’s blog, the Pennsylvania Law Monitor
• There is no resisting the urge to write something about Twitter – Boston lawyer Dave Broadwin of Foley Hoag on the firm’s Emerging Enterprise Center Blog