LexBlog Network Law Roundup – 5/20/09
May 20, 2009
Okay, it appears as though things are really back to normal after power outages at the data center. Today, the batch of posts include what to expect from a divorce of the always interesting ‘Jon & Kate Plus 8’ couple, the accuracy of fingerprints and the potential for sabotage.
- California appellate court weighs in on the limits of estate planning malpractice liability – Miami lawyer Juan Antunez of Stokes McMillan Maracini & Antunez in his Florida Probate & Trust Litigation Blog
- Alabama Woman Accused of Murder-For-Hire Plot Awaits Appeal – Birmingham attorney Steven Eversole on his Birmingham Criminal Defense Blog
- Are you safe from sabotage? – New Jersey lawyer Anne Bancroft of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog Managing Work Force Reductions
- How accurate are fingerprints? – Waco attorney Walter Reaves in his Texas Criminal Law Blog
- Legislative Update: Conn. House Approves Bill Banning Use of Credit Reports for Employment Decisions – Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog
- Preliminary Injunction against Publication and Dissemination of Documents Received in Public Records Request Violates First Amendment – David Bowerman of K&L Gates on the firm’s Electronic Discovery Law blog
- Why Shouldn’t You Rely on Certificates of Insurance As Proof of Additional Insured Coverage? – Chicago attorney Ashley Brandt of Foran Glennon Palandech & Ponzi on the firm’s Illinois Construction Law Blog
- Supreme Court Issues Decision in AT&T v. Hulteen – Columbus lawyer Jaime Powell of Porter Wright on the firm’s Employer Law Report
- Jon & Kate Plus 8…Plus 1: What to Expect Under Pennsylvania Law if They Divorce – Yardley attorney Joseph Visco of Stark & Stark on the firm’s blog, the Pennsylvania Law Monitor
- There is no resisting the urge to write something about Twitter – Boston lawyer Dave Broadwin of Foley Hoag on the firm’s Emerging Enterprise Center Blog
Posted in: