Legal News – LexBlogosphere: 5/4/09
May 4, 2009
The LexBlogosphere posts have been away for a couple days as I worked on two projects of varying excitement levels. Both are for LexBlog, one you’ll see shortly and another with time. Anyway, after two all-nighters since the last LexBlogosphere post, here’s the best from today:
- ADA Amendments: retroactive application will find more disabled claimants – Pennsylvania attorney Karl Romberger of Fox Rothschild in the firm’s Education Law Blog
- Oregon’s Court of Appeals Defines “Collapse”; Rules on Scope of Coverage – Portland lawyer Diane Polscer of Gordon & Polscer, contributing on the National Insurance Law Forum
- Back to Square One – First Amendment authority Richard Kaplar on Media & Communications Policy
- What happens when the judge and prosecutor are dating? – Waco attorney Walter Reaves in his Texas Criminal Law Blog
- Knowledge That Case Went to Appellate Mediation Did Not Require Court’s Recusal – Birmingham lawyer Craig N. Rosler with Lightfoot Franklin & White in the firm’s Alabama Appellate Watch Blog
- Fired for Tweeting? – Los Angeles attorney Diane Crumpacker of on her blog, the Southern California Employment Law Report
- MN Supreme Court Decision on Breathalyzer Source Code Intentionally Ambivalent? – Los Angeles lawyer Daniel Reisman on his Los Angeles Business Litigation Blog
- The Life Experiences of a Judge Make a Difference – Texas attorney Tom Crane on his San Antonio Employment Law Blog
- How Should Employers Respond to CHRO Complaints? Carefully – Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog
- Thinking outside the box to increase low-income employee participation in 401(k) plans – Retirement expert Jerry Kalish on the National Benefit Services’ Retirement Plan Blog
Posted in: