Legal News – LexBlogosphere: 12/14/07

Rounding out the week with another selection of prime posts from around the LexBlogosphere, featuring firms both big and small.

The continuing discussion on December 14, 2007 includes the following fine posts:

•  A DWI trial “win” is all relative – Texas lawyer Hunter Biederman in his Frisco DWI Lawyer & Attorney Blog
• 10 brain fitness myths – Las Vegas attorney Tim Titolo in his Brain & Spine Injury Law Blog
• Fans: friend or foe? – The blogging lawyers & attorneys at Sheppard Mullin in the firm’s Intellectual Property Law Blog
• Responding to the EEOC and state agency discrimination charges: five things every HR generalist should know – Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in his Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog
• What to do when you receive a bankruptcy preference demand letter – Lawrenceville lawyer Robyn Nolan Howlett of Stark & Stark in the firm’s New Jersey Law Blog
• Privilege claims must be supported by specific facts – Illinois attorney R. David Donoghue of DLA Piper in his Chicago IP Litigation Blog
• Rebutting the presumption of competence – Philadelphia lawyer Mark Jakubik of The Jakubik Law Firm in his Pennsylvania Estate Planning Blog
• After Kakani v. Oracle are “claims made” class settlements obsolete? – Los Angeles attorney Brian Van Vleck of Van Vleck Turner & Zaller in the firm’s California Labor & Employment Defense Blog
• Restrictions on defenses – Shrewsbury lawyer Travis Tormey of The Law Office of John Marshall in their New Jersey Criminal Defense & DWI Blog
• When you really want to have a child – Philadelphia attorney Jane E. Lessner of Fox Rothschild in the firm’s Pennsylvania Family Law Blog