Social networking in legal profession : No rules please

Chris Kraft of Hubbard One posts today that when it comes to social networking for business (LinkedIn and the like) there are no rules, just take it for a spin.

People started using the Internet, not so long ago, to connect with people. Pure and simple. The trends around social networking are really just the latest manifestation of this desire to communicate with communities of people.
.....
With the evolving nature of the Internet, it is difficult to put exact structures around appropriate usage [of social networks for business purposes]. What might work today could drastically change tomorrow with the invention of a new feature, community or application. As noted in the Pew Internet article 'What feels old and 'traditional' about the Internet to our respondents is that it's a voluntary social sphere where people can give and can take. What's new about the Internet to these enthusiastic users is the rate at which it is influenced by people who use it for new kinds of social purposes. People aren't waiting to figure out its proper use, or for clear 'rules of the road' to be articulated, they're simply taking it for a spin.'

Chris' talk reminds me of Shel Israel's point that I very much agree with that communities on the net form naturally and by like interests, not by gated and walled communities.

Communities are bodies of people loosely joined together by a common interest. Historically, that common interest could be geography, a profession, a religion, a political affiliation or even a hobby like stamp collecting.

The Internet has reduced the physical boundaries of community. You can now have a strong bind with community members you have never met. It is based on shared passion and interest.

Though Shel may argue that LinkedIn is by its nature is a portal with walls and gates, how we use LinkedIn and other social networks is wide open. We're wide open as to how we strengthen existing networks, meet people with similar interests, or ask questions of thought leaders. We're also free to leverage what and who we find at one at one place, ie, FaceBook, with another, whether it be LinkedIn, Twitter, or whatever.

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1 800 913-0988.

all information is required please

Shel Israel of Global Neighbourhoods [LexBlog Q & A]

Today's guest in the LexBlog hot seat is one of the blogosphere's most well-known faces: Shel Israel, who began his career as a reporter and has since established himself as a leading name in the technology industry.

In addition to speaking engagements and business advising, Shel co-wrote Naked Conversations with Robert Scoble in 2006 (the book recently celebrated its second birthday), and continues to operate a widely read blog called Global Neighbourhoods.

1. Rob La Gatta: I'm a journalism student, and there seems to be a disconnect between my peers (who are optimistic about the exciting future possibilities of the field), and our professors, who have a much bleaker outlook. As a journalist yourself, do you think current journalism students picked a bad time to enter the business?

Shel Israel: First, let's clarify what is strong and what is imperiled. I think the traditional media companies are going to have a great deal of problems so long as they remain loyal to paper distribution of products and one-way electronic broadcast. Quite simply, slicing and processing trees, smearing them with ink, putting them into plastic bags, then taking a fleet of fossil-burning vehicles to distribute them onto driveways, is inefficient and quite bad for the environment.

So, the companies that still do this are hurting financially, and they respond by cutting the numbers of journalists. In the U.S. from the year 2001 to 2003, I've read that there were 75,000 fewer reporting and editing jobs in traditional media. That looks quite bleak.

However, simultaneous to that, online journalism has flourished. There are more news gathering organizations online every day. Many are doing quite well economically. I would wager that the day will come quite soon when the New York Times makes greater revenue online than they do off. As the revenue grows, so will the number of paid journalists.

In any democracy, we need journalists, to watch and report on the rest of the institutions. That just isn't going to die. But there can be no individual freedom without economic freedom, and right now the number of paid journalistic positions in the U.S. is not growing fast enough.

I believe it soon will, and that the profession of journalist will be overwhelmingly online.

2. Rob La Gatta: Many companies, at least within the tech world, seem to operate corporate blogs that offer a degree of transparency to the company's operations. Is it reasonable to assume that eventually, operating a blog will be a pivotal tool for gaining the trust of the general public?

Shel Israel: I think that we are reaching the day when an enterprise-related blog is an everyday tool, just like e-mail or phone. When your generation replaces my generation, in a few short years in the marketplace and the workplace, blogs will simply be a normal tool of conversation - and among the best for scalable conversation.

But keep it in perspective. Companies are fundamentally about products and services. You can have great products and be a poor user of social media tools. Look at Apple and Google. Will this backfire on them? Maybe. Maybe not.

But for most companies, there is a need to get closer with customers: to understand what they like about you and what they like about your competitors, to get a sense of what they want you to do next. Social media is the most efficient way to do that so far.

3. Rob La Gatta: It seems like while a lot of professionals utilize new media, the general public is less quick to adapt. Is a mass embrace of these tools - newsfeed readers, for example - something that will inevitably occur over time? Or will we continue to see this technological divide until the old model is rendered obsolete and retired?

Shel Israel: I disagree with your premise. When you add up the number of people reading blogs, watching online video, [and] engaging in social networking, you probably have a number nearly equal to the number of people reading newspapers and watching TV.

For example, there are 125 downloads on YouTube for every New York Times newspaper sold. Until a couple of months ago, Facebook was growing by a million [users] a week.

I don't see a technological divide. I see a generational divide. Younger people are in the habit of using social media tools and most older people are not. As the younger people age and replace my generation, their habits will not change.

4. Rob La Gatta: You wrote last month that through the use of blogs, PR specialists have an opportunity to "have actual relationships with the public." Do you believe that traditional PR firms - those who care less about entering the conversation than they do about hyping up one side of it - will become a thing of the past?

Shel Israel: I think traditional practitioners can keep engaging in doing what they have always done and end up driving off into Jurassic Park, where they can hang out with the other fossils.

The trends are clear on what is happening. In terms of PR, the tipping point has passed. Those who see their jobs as engaging only traditional media understand that the traditional media, while still influential, is growing less so. They understand that the demographic is changing. I could have my numbers off a bit, but 30 years ago 70 million Americans watched network TV. The viewer's average age was 30. Now, 30 million watch network TV [and] the average age is 60. There is a vanishing point, and like objects in the rear view mirror, it is nearer than some might think.

5. Rob La Gatta: Forget for a moment all of the professional recognition you have received. What do you find to be the most personally rewarding aspect of blogging? As a blogger, what continues to drive you?

Shel Israel: If I were really famous, I would get a much better seat in fancy restaurants. I started blogging to get back in shape as a writer after having spent 25 years in PR. I figured if I were going to be broke, I might as well get back to what I love.

I asked four people to collaborate on a book with me; the fourth guy, Robert Scoble, felt he had something to say about corporate blogging. I began the project as a writer [and] I thought my next book would be on another topic.

But then I started talking to the people who were immersed in the blogosphere and I started to understand the magnitude of change involved. I evolved into an evangelist for the conversation over the monologue, and that turned out to have elements of the "power to the people" anthem we sang when I came of age in the 60s.

I blog now because I feel like I have something to say, and I am gratified because there seem to be some people who want to listen and then talk with me.

Interested in hearing more? Recent LexBlog Q & A posts:

Or, see our full list of legal blog interviews.

Happy Birthday Naked Conversations

Naked ConversationsNaked Conversations celebrated it's second birthday this past Saturday.

For the unknowing, NC is a one of the seminal books on blogging. From wikipedia:

[Robert Scoble and Shel Israel] argue that almost every business can benefit from smart "naked" blogging, whether the company's a small-town plumbing operation or a multinational fashion house. "If you ignore the blogosphere... you won't know what people are saying about you," they write. "You can't learn from them, and they won't come to see you as a sincere human who cares about your business and its reputation." To bolster their argument, Scoble and Israel have assembled an enormous amount of information about blogging: from history and theory to comparisons among countries and industries. They also lay out the dos and don'ts of the medium and include extensive statistics, dozens of case studies and several interviews with famous bloggers.

If you're in a PR or business development position (aren't we all) trying to follow blogs and learn what blogs are all about, read it. If the concepts don't make sense, read it again. If you're already blogging effectively, read it. It gets the juices really going.

Shel's comments on the the two year anniversary are enlightening.

It's hard to believe it has only been two years since the book was introduced.  Sometimes it seems the writing of Naked Conversations happened a very long time ago.  Sometimes I think the stories we told are ancient. Yet the book is still selling moderately well, which please me almost as much as it surprises me.

Then I realize that the stories are old only if you have already heard them.  Blogging has, of course, become only a single tool in an enormous social media tool shed. It has also become fruitful and multiplied.  We wrote when there were about 14 million bloggers.  Now there are more than 100 million. There may be as many as a half-billion people involved in social media worldwide.

What has remained intact, I think, is our key point.  There is a revolution going on that is transforming the way businesses talk with customers. That revolution has a key attribute. It's about the conversation, not any one tool.

Thanks Robert and Shel.

Online communites without walls and gates

With all the talk of social networking and social or business community websites like FaceBook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Plaxo, and now, Spock, you'd think the concept of communities was just discovered in the last couple years. Not true.

As Shel Israel recently posted, in response to Jeremiah Owyang's Twitter comments about social media, the 'definition of community really hasn't been much changed since the Internet came in.'

...Since the advent of social media, there are a lot more communities and a great many people belong to more communities than they used to.

But by definition, they remain the same. Communities are bodies of people loosely joined together by a common interest.  Historically, that common interest could be geography, a profession, a religion, a political affiliation or even a hobby like stamp collecting.

The Internet has reduced the physical boundaries of community. You can now have a strong bind with community members you have never met. It is based on shared passion and interest.

And communities aren't something that someone or a company owns. A community is not defined by a web portal with walls and gates, it's defined by a common interest.

As a blogging lawyer you can participate in social networking sites like LinkedIn, Plaxo, FaceBook and the like. But it's not necessary to do so to be part of a community of people with interests similar to your own. Such people being prospective clients, peers, and amplifiers of your message (other bloggers and the media). You'll have been drawn together as a community, not by registration at a website but by a common passion.

Don't think of your blog as a publishing tool or a search engine magnet. Think of your blog as a medium by which you'll participate in a community. And instead of having to follow the revenue driven protocols and road maps developed by a social networking company, your community will be comprised of people anywhere with a common interest who have an effective Internet presence.

And like lawyers in your hometown who have benefited from decades of networking offline, you should get out there and network in your online community. To grow personally, and to grow professionally.

Million well chosen words may not be enough

Shel Israel, a pioneer in blogging and co-author of Naked Conversations: How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers, believes, in time, more people will be using video cameras than posting text to blogs. For one reason, he believes it's easier.

Shel's no fool. And as a journalist and writer he'd be reluctant to acknowledge the role of video. So I'm watching a few episodes of Shel's new 'Up Close' video shows at Your Truman Show.

I'm already picking up a few gems in his videos that I may not have picked up in text. One, the title of the post coming from something Shel said, 'a million well chosen words may not be enough.'

Shel tells the story of years ago of when a young video news reporter covering the same story as Shel in New Bedford, Mass climbs out of TV station van with satellite dish. No matter whether Shel did Pulitzer quality writing, his story was not going to be in the paper until the next morning. The Bozo with the camera and makeup was going to have the story on news at 11.

My guess is that video on the net will become much bigger. And though I do not see video replacing text altogether at anytime, Shel has peaked my interest. I am looking at video cameras. And you may see me with 120 second tip of the week videos coming soon.

As way of background and disclosure, Your Truman Show says it's '...committed to helping great storytellers to share their stories on video. It provides a free platform that enables anyone to create their own personal channel, share their stories and review other people's lives.' Shel's on their board. I'm not.