Bloggers realize self-interest isn't everything

Traditional economic models assume that people are self-interested, they do things which are in their financial interest. But at some point, people begin acting for the greater good. This per the New York Times' Robert Frank's article, 'When Self-Interest Isn't Everything.'

Though Frank's article was about the phenomenon of political campaigns driven by supporters' willingness to set narrow self-interest to one side, I couldn't help but think of bloggers publishing content for the greater good. Especially blogging lawyers giving away knowledge they usually sell.

We already have 5 or 10 thousand lawyers engaging in online conversations offering insight and commentary in niche areas of the law. We're accumulating free legal information at speeds never seen before. Thousands of legal blog posts per day is going to turn into tens of thousands of posts by the end of this decade.

Turns out lawyer dissatisfaction with their careers may be the reason why lawyers have chosen to blog for the greater good. It's personal disappointment that gets people to put self-interest aside per Frank's article.

Albert O. Hirschman, an economist at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, was one of the first to grapple seriously with [the concept of participating in something larger than oneself]. In his 1982 book 'Shifting Involvements,' he acknowledges that self-interest indeed appears to be the dominant human motive in some eras. But over time, he argues, many people begin to experience disappointment as they continue to accumulate material goods. When consumption standards escalate, people must work harder just to hold their place. Stress levels rise. People become less willing to devote resources to the public sphere, which begins to deteriorate. Against this backdrop, disenchanted consumers become increasingly receptive to appeals from the organizers of social movements.

Eventually, Mr. Hirschman argues, a tipping point is reached. In growing numbers, people peel away from their private rat race to devote energy to collective goals. The free-rider problem ceases to inhibit them, not only because they now assign less value to private consumption, but also because they find satisfaction in the very act of contributing to the common good. Activities viewed as costs by self-interest models are thus seen as benefits instead.

Though Frank's reports a cycle of working for the greater good may only last for 20 years before people resume pursuing private accumulation, I'll take a 20 year wave of lawyer blogging. Not because of my own pecuniary interests, but because blogging is good for lawyers and our society at large.

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1 800 913-0988.

all information is required please

NY Times takes major stake in blog platform

The New York Times has invested $30 Million in Automattic, the web based commercial arm of the Wordpress blog platform.

Law professor to blog for New York Times : Opportunities await law bloggers

Law Blog Professor Steven DavidoffWayne State University Law School Professor Steven Davidoff is going to be blogging full time with the New York Times.

He's hooking up with the New York Times DealBook as the Deal Professor. Steven says not to worry.

...[I]t will be the same blog covering the same topics with the same length of posts and legal analysis, just with the expanded resources of those great N.Y. Times deal reporters, including Andrew Ross Sorkin and Michael de la Merced.

Expect more lawyers to become bloggers for major publications and news websites. Lawyers are killer reporters and commentators on niche legal subjects. And who's got more domain expertise?

Plus, with declining circulation of hard copy newspapers and increasing online readership, newspaper revenues are in decline. Though online revenues are on the rise, they can't match the loss of hard copy advertising and subscription revenues. As a result, newspapers and media centers are on the look out for syndicated content from good bloggers.

Golden opportunity for you law bloggers. Whether it be with national mass media, national trade media, or local/regional newspapers.

And you don't have to wait for the publications to contact you. Get to know the reporters and editors at publications for which you would like to blog. How? Comment on their stories and blog posts. Right on their news sites and and in your own blog. Send them an email from time to time. Connect with them on LinkedIn.

If you don't get asked to blog for the publication, ask them. Propose that they add a blog and that you write it.

Others following this news

8 reasons why blogging lawyers are happier

Sunday's New Times article brought more attention to lawyers' dissatisfaction with the practice of law.

I'm no mental health expert, but I work with hundreds of lawyers who are blogging. Blogging lawyers are a generally happy breed as well as experiencing a good deal of career satisfaction. I don't think it's any coincidence.

Why are blogging lawyers happier?

  • Blogging lawyers plan for success. All too often lawyers end up working on whatever comes there way. Rather than defining success as working in a niche area of law you would enjoy for the clients you would enjoy working for, you define success as having enough money to keep the wolves away from the door - both at the office and at home. It's then follow the money, as opposed to follow enjoyment. You can have both if you plan.
  • Blogging lawyers work on their success plan. A successful blog begins with the end in mind. What do you hope to achieve? As reputation, type of work you want to do, and the type of clients you want to have. Knowing you are working a career path leading to success is personally rewarding.
  • Success is defined by doing what you love, as opposed to making as much money as possible. People want to make meaning. People want to be proud of what they do. People, including the very wealthy, are not driven by the desire to hold little green pieces of paper in their hands. Defining success as doing something you are passionate about, whether it be advising on security issues for Fortune 200 companies or representing injured workers on compensation claims, brings enjoyment.
  • Writing on an area of law for which you have a passion is enjoyable. You follow what others in your field are writing. You realize what you are sharing has value to others, no matter how small your niche audience may be.
  • Networking with others who have similar passions. It's enjoyable to find out there's others out there who area as passionate as you about a niche area of the law. Better yet, being able to follow what they write via RSS and networking with them via your blog, email, and occasional phone call is a hoot. When you meet up at a conference, you'll have instant friends.
  • Blogging lawyers get known as leading authorities in a niche area of law. We all have egos. Getting known as an expert feeds that ego.
  • Blogging lawyers get work by word of mouth because of their expertise. They become a 'lawyer's lawyer.' Face it, we all looked at the leaders in a niche and imagined how cool it would be to get work because others referred it to us and then screen for the best. It happens over time with blogging.
  • Blogging lawyers regularly get positive feedback from other people. Every lawyer in this country has a letter they keep in their top drawer they pull out on a hard day to remind them why they became a lawyer. It is the letter from somebody who said, "I really appreciate what you did for me, you made a difference for me and my family, and you really helped me on this matter." You keep that letter. But you do not get those every day. You do not get them every month. You may not even get them once a year. With blogs you get that type of feedback on an ongoing basis.

There's probably eighteen other reasons why lawyers who blog effectively are happier. Let me know of other reasons you think of.

Lawyers 'feel' lack of prestige in profession : New York Times

The biggest lesson I learned in 17 years of practicing law was that you couldn't separate who you are and what you stood for as a person with who you were and what you did as a lawyer. If the two didn't mesh, it meant for a big psychological drag. The symptoms of this drag: 'wondering if this was all the law was about?' and at times, worse, 'depression.'

In this mornings New York Times Alex Williams writes about the struggles of our legal profession and its fall from grace along with another noble profession, being a doctor. It's the latest in what seems to be onslaught of press and Internet discussion about lawyers being unhappy with their work. Money's not enough.

The pay is still good (sometimes very good), and the in-laws aren't exactly complaining. Still, something is missing, say many doctors, lawyers and career experts: the old sense of purpose, of respect, of living at the center of American society and embodying its definition of 'success.'
.....
...[M]any doctors and lawyers still find the higher calling of their profession -- helping people -- as well as the prestige and money, worth the hard work. And the stars in either field are still that: commanding the handsome compensation and social cachet. But to others, the daily trudge serves as a constant reminder that the entrepreneur's autonomy simply can't be found in law or medicine.

How bad is it? Per the Times' Williams:

  • Forty-four percent of lawyers recently surveyed by the American Bar Association said they would not recommend the profession to a young person.
  • Law firms lose, on average, nearly a fifth of their associates in any given year.
  • 20 percent of lawyers will suffer depression at some point in their careers.
  • Law school applicants dropped to 83,500 in 2006 from 98,700 in 2004--representing a 6.7 percent drop between 2006 and 2005, on top of the 5.2 percent slip the previous year.
  • As firms demand ever more billable hours, lawyers find less time for pro bono work -- the very thing that once gave them a sense of higher calling.

I'm not an expert, I just lived it. But I agree with Richard Florida, the author of 'The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life,' who told Williams 'There used to be this idea of having a separate work self and home self. Now they just want to be themselves. It's almost as if they're interviewing places to see if they fit them.'

If you're struggling as a lawyer, find something you love doing. Do work you'll find personally and professionally rewarding. May hurt in the pocketbook in the short term, but it's worth it.



Related post



Other takes on this NY Times article

NY Times to start using amateur video

NY Times amateur videoFurther evidence that we're at the cusp of blended pro-am journalism is New York Times decision to start using videos produced by citizen journalists.

Per Beet.TV, the videos will run starting tomorrow on the Op-Ed pages of the NYTimes.com. They'll cover the political campaign and be uploaded through February 5, 'Super Tuesday.'

An example of a unedited video interview of Mike Huckabee can be accessed here. These down to earth interviews by average folks are pretty cool.

What's this have to do with lawyers? A lot. Lawyers are already amateur journalists through their well done law blogs. Taken a step further and such blog content is going to be syndicated as legal scholarship and commentary to third party publications or platforms, just as the video is syndicated to the NY Times here.

Beyond text, lawyers are going to move to video, both of themselves reporting on niche areas of the law and interviewing third parties, which these lawyers are uniquely qualified to produce because of their domain expertise.

Source on post: ReadWriteWeb

Steal my content, please!

That's the title of a post from Robert Scoble last week. He was responding to Susan Mernit's report that Lane Hartwell was so pissed with people stealing her photographs that she decided to take her photos out of the public eye.

After offering up a way to watermark the photos and keep them online, Scoble says he's just the opposite.

I WANT YOU to steal my content. In fact, next year I'm going to do stuff to make all my content available via Creative Commons license so you can use it whereever and whenever, including my video shows. I'd like a credit, yes, but don't demand it. I'd rather just add to the human experience and if that means that other people make money off of my work, so be it.

I've found that the more I give away my content, the more magical stuff happens to me anyway and if that means my photos or writings or videos get used in some way that I don't really like, well, that's a risk I'm willing to take. Lane obviously is not.

Plus, today I have a little less competition from Lane, who was a great photographer but who's work will be hard to discover now.

I'm right there with Scoble. And you lawyers should be wanting people stealing your blog content. The more it's stolen by blockquote, reference and link, the easier for the world to discover you. And isn't that what's it all about, getting known for our expertise?

Want further evidence that you want people stealing your content? Scoble cites the New York Times whose traffic has taken off since removing its subscription pay wall in September.

As Scoble says, '...[W]hen you try to hold onto your content too tightly fewer people are able to find it.'

New York Times editor off base when it comes to lawyer blogs

Per the Editors Weblog, Bill Keller, the executive editor of The New York Times, believes that new media such as blogs could never compete with the trustworthy news generated by actual newspaper reporting.

Keller says that things like blogs, search engines and Google News could never replace actual reporting. He says "What is absent from the vast array of new media outlets is, first and foremost, the great engine of newsgathering - the people who witness events, ferret out information, supply context and explanation."
.....
He explains that sources like Google and Wikipedia cannot replace traditional newspapers because they do not produce content. They aggregate material from many different sources, some of which are very unreliable.

Lawyer blogs, in many cases do produce content. Lawyers ferret out information, supply context and explanation. Even if there were legal news reporters on the niches covered by law blogs, and there are not, reporters would have no where near the domain expertise of a skilled lawyer.

Blogs are not going to replace newspapers by any stretch of the imagination. But newspapers would be well served to realize well done niche blogs in areas such as the law are a trustworthy, if not the only, source of information and commentary.

Smart newspapers, the New York Times included, are leveraging the news platform they have to curate blog content to complement content the paper generates. We're already seeing that in legal reporting. Incisive Media's ALM is developing a law blog network. The ABA Journal is culling blog content as part of its online edition.

Give us a five years and 75,000 more law blogs and we practicing lawyers, law professors, and law students will be doing a lot of reporting. And a force to reckoned with if we are not incorporated into legal newspapers and magazines.

New York Times adds reader comments to front page

New York Times Lawyer Comments
Silicon Alley Insider discovered yesterday that The New Times was testing the display of reader comments at the bottom of individual news stories on their online edition. Based on what I've heard, expect comments to be a regular feature.

New York Times Lawyer Comments

Like Silicon Alley, I've always been impressed with the Times innovative use of its website. I'm always showing folks attending my presentations all the RSS feeds the Times has for its separate sections and columns. Reader participation is just another step in making the paper more relevant in the lives of its readers.

Lawyers, this is a coup for you. Imagine the Times and newspapers across the country allowing comments to news stories involving legal issues. Your regular commenting is as as good as being a regular on the Larry Kind Show when he's covering legal stories - except at a local level, where people know you and you get your work.

Commenting on legal news, as you do on your blog already, is not only a valuable contribution to citizens' understanding of the law, but also a golden way of further enhancing your reputation as a reliable and trusted authority in your area of expertise.

Source on post: Josh Catone at Read/WriteWeb