Twitter's growth continues at super-linear rate : Powerful professional and business development tool for lawyers

Twitter's growth is continuing at last year's super-linear rate. The number of unique visitors using Twitter has grown from 40 Million in May of 2009 to over 80 Million in May of this year.

Growth Twitter in Unique Vistors

Lawyers holding on to the belief that Twitter is not a powerful professional and business development tool are misguided. Twitter is ubiquitous among the influencers of your clients and prospective clients -- bloggers, publishers, reporters, association leaders, and conference coordinators.

And though it doesn't matter if your clients ever use Twitter for Twitter use to lead to business development success, Lawyers will find innovative clients and prospective clients among regular Twitter users -- executives, in-house counsel, venture capitalists, and local business people.

Lawyers can use Twitter in multiple ways (I'm missing many).

  • Share news of interest with your target audience (clients, prospective clients, referral sources, and the influencers of those three). Read how lawyers can serve as an intelligent agent on Twitter.
  • Following leaders in the law, media, academia, business, and finance on Twitter is tremendous for professional development. I was told to follow advance sheets and bar publications when I began practicing. Twitter gives you better info in a more timely fashion. Social media and the Internet are not all about marketing, they're powerful learning tools for lawyers looking to get better at what they do.
  • Building relationships with clients, prospective clients, and their influencers. Sharing what you're learning from news and commentary in blogs and mainstream media and re-sharing what influencers are sharing on Twitter reinforces your client's belief that you're the right lawyer and builds an intimate relationship between you and people you may have never met.
  • Builds trust. People who follow what you share on Twitter and those who see what you share because it is re-tweeted view you as a trusted news source. It's a small step from being trusted for legal insight and commentary to being called when someone has a legal need, a reporter needs to talk to an expert, or a conference coordinator is looking for a speaker.
  • Building a network to call upon. There's no way I could have found five or six social media policies in 15 minutes while sitting in a coffee shop in Rockefeller Center without asking my Twitter network.

Larry Bodine recently blogged that Twitter may be unlikely to go 'mass market' as only 7% of people use Twitter. If his point was that Twitter does not offer significant business development value for lawyers and law firms, he's misguided.

Lawyers and law firms have spent billions of dollars in public relations and business development efforts to reach a select group of people -- often influencers.

No one found it alarming that only a fraction of a percent of the public had AP subscriptions, had a printing press, or put on Industry conferences. You built relationships with the people who did as they helped build the reputation of you and your firm.

I'd be more apt to follow the counsel of Betsy Munnell, a large firm attorney of 25 years and now business development coach. Munnell explained why a senior lawyer ought to use Twitter, including how Twitter's unsurpassed as learning tool.

...Twitter is an unparalleled filter for the massive, unwieldy worldwide web, vastly superior to Google Alerts, blog composites and the like. So I get all my news, and a lot of good ideas, off Hootsuite [Twitter web app] and the reliable links my super bright Twitter friends provide.

It's easy as a lawyer to discount those things you don't understand and have not used effectively. Don't do it to Twitter, it'll be your loss.

Related Posts

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1-800-913-0988.

all information is required please

Martindale Connected membership growing : Are you using Connected?

Larry Bodine, despite being an early sceptic, blogs that LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell's legal community, Martindale Connected, is continuing to grow.

Back on March 31, Martindale Connected launched with 3,000 members and a headwind of skepticism.  Despite this, the online social network has crested over 12,000 members in just 4 months. I joined myself, made a few connections and am experimenting by starting some discussions.

LexisNexis has its PR machine cranked up touting the successes of Connected. Maybe for reason, maybe Bodine's caught up in it, I don't know. I'd like to know what you as members of our legal profession see.

  • Have you heard of Connected? Do you know what it is?
  • Are you or members of your law firm registered as members of Connected?
  • If so, are you or your firm members regular users of Connected?
  • If you are not using Connected, is it in your plans?
  • If you're an in-house counsel, are you using Connected? Do you have plans to?

When it comes to networking through the net, I'm of record that the open net where you control your presence and can engage your target audience as you want is the way to go. Others believe legal professionals need a closed community keeping members of the public out.

Not sure how the later makes sense, even in the case of engaging in-house counsel. Lawyers looking to enhance their reputation as thought leaders are going to spend their time where it generates the highest ROI.

A public interface through blogging, an effective use of LinkedIn, Twitter, and maybe even Facebook gets a lawyer out where they are seen by clients, prospective clients, referral sources, reporters, conference coordinators, bloggers, and publishers.

I'm not sure how a closed community matches that. And even if the closed community has some value, do lawyers have time to do both?

What do you think? Do you see the value in Martindale Connected?

Martindale-Hubbell : Law firms continue to drop out of directory

Martindale-HubbellLaw marketing expert, Larry Bodine, posted yesterday morning that more law firms are dropping their listing in the Martindale-Hubbell legal directory, long viewed as the bible of lawyer directories.

Though law firms realize that some general counsel may still be using the Martindale-Hubbell directory during the law firm selection process, the cost benefit analysis doesn't stand up. More law firms are finding Martindale-Hubbell costs too much when comparing the benefits received from a listing.

Larry first references the informal survey of Philadelphia firms by Delaware Valley Law Firm Marketing Group showing that 'more firms are eliminating or scaling back their Martindale-Hubbell's directory listing.' According to the groups founder, Stacy West Clark, having to pay by the word or 'unit' is causing 'enormous pain' for law firms.

Though formulating a list of law firms who have exited Martindale-Hubbell has been elusive, here's who Larry has confirmed as leaving the directory.

Word across the Internet and behind closed doors at law firms is that we're going to reach a tipping point on law firms using Martindale-Hubbell. Law firms, by and large, have found a Martindale-Hubbell listing necessary because all the other law firms were listed. When all the other law firms are not listed in the directory, a Martindale-Hubbell listing will no longer be needed. The pendulum will have swung.

Amazing part in Martindale-Hubbell's slide is their total lack of an effective Internet presence to combat this discussion. Martindale-Hubbell's internal people and outside PR professionals have done little, if anything, to stem the tide of the discussion eroding their very core. Martindale needs to become more transparent and enter into a real discussion with their customer base and the influencers of those customers.

Microsoft was once viewed as the evil empire by the development community and many of their customers. A thousand plus blogs from Microsoft employees made the company's methods and goals much more transparent. In addition, such blogs generated a discussion between Microsoft developers and customers leading to improved products (in same cases) and viral discussion about new launches. Customers feeling part of Microsoft's development plans were much more likely to purchase and use the company's products.

Google had significant problems, and still does, with privacy issues. A few years ago the company did not have an effective Internet presence. When a story broke across on the net about Google's caching impacting users privacy, all Google could do was issue press releases and hold a press conference. Despite the efforts of Google's PR professionals, the story broke very poorly in the Wall Street Journal and other main stream media.

No coincidence that Google now has probably 75 blogs published by various individuals and development groups in the company. When a negative story breaks, those bloggers, with a readership in the thousands, can respond with blog posts about how an issue or problem arose and how Google is addressing it at that very minute. In addition, those bloggers help frame Internet discussion on new products Google's working on. All of that blogged information is consumed by amplifiers of Google's message - other bloggers and the media (trade & mass media). Effective PR? You bet.

LexisNexis can choose to have their Martindale-Hubbell brand trounced in blogs, listservs, news websites, and offline trade publications. They're doing a nice job of it using PR methods of days gone by with expensive PR agencies monitoring net discussion, framing PR responses for the company, and dabbling on the side with a few bloggers.

But if Martindale-Hubbell is serious about saving themselves they are going to need to wholeheartedly endorse online networking through blogs. The outcome would be both a gradual pick up of allies along the way as well as learning how to improve their services from their very customers - law firms and consultants already taking part in this online discussion.

I am not talking 75 blogs mind you, but how about starting with one or two from people in leadership positions at LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell? When they work, add a couple from IT development and business development folks. Will there be some work in figuring out how to use blogs? Sure. Likely to stumble once or twice? Yep. But the down side of inaction will be the loss of a long standing product that's generated hundreds of millions of dollars in revenues year after year.

And bottom line doesn't it make sense for a company that says '...our innovation drives your success' to show a little innovation in saving the Martindale-Hubbell lawyer directory. It's a legacy product that deserves saving with the right services, pricing, and positioning.

Related posts

Google is only lawyer directory to bother with

There's only one lawyer directory that matters, and that's Google, says legal marketing expert, Larry Bodine.

Lawyers are repeatedly seduced and marketers are constantly aggravated to take space in law firm directories.' Which one to choose? How much to pay? Should you pay?' I can make the decision easy for you. There is only one directory you need to worry about: Google.
.....
Clients use Google to look up phone numbers and addresses, so law firms can cancel their yellow pages ads. When clients want to check out your firm, they are not going to call up to get your printed brochure, they will look you up online.

I have heard Larry speak and he's speaking of the importance of Google for all sized law firms, from solos to the very largest.

Other search engines aren't all that important for lawyers either. New research from Compete.com, indicates Google's share of Web searches in September 2007 was 67%, up from 54% in 2006. Yahoo is at 19%, down from 29% in 2006, with MSN at 9%.

Google lawyer directory

I agree with Larry. Though it may still be worth my while, I never look at Yahoo or MSN when examining the search engine performance of my sites or LexBlog client blog sites.

As for directories such as FindLaw, Martindale-Hubbell, Super Lawyers, Avvo, and the like, the most important function they can play is getting the biographical information of your firm and its lawyers indexed at Google. The days of a lawyer directory portal site where Internet users go to look up lawyers are coming to an end.