TweetDeck is another reason to use own name as user name on Twitter

Need another reason to use your own name, as opposed to a pseudonym, as your username on Twitter? Beyond the fact that your own name is how people know you.

For making it easy for people to give you proper attribution on Twitter on TweetDeck, a desktop application many of us use to Twitter.

I share relevant blog posts of others with my Twitter followers. Rather than just post a blog title and a link, I want to attribute the blog post to its author. I do this by putting the Twitter username of the blog author in parentheses after the text in my Tweet.

See the below example of my Twitter post where I shared Attorney Sam Hasler's blog post, 'What Other Indiana Family Law Blogs Are Saying.' In addition to the post title and link, I gave Sam attribution for the link I am sharing with the '@schasler,' Sam's username on Twitter.

Twitter post about what are Indiana family law blogs wrting about

How'd I know that Sam's Twitter name was '@schasler?' I just keyed in 'has' in TweetDeck's autocomplete feature that came up after I hit the '@' key. Up popped Sam's Twitter user name in a brief list of people I follow on Twitter who also have 'has' in their name. See the below for what I mean.

Use own name on Twitter for TweetDeck

If Sam used a Twitter username such '@Indianadivorcelawyer,' something many lawyers too clever for their own good do, I could have never recalled such a username. I follow a ton of people on Twitter and know Sam as Sam Hasler, not some pseudonym.

In addition to giving proper attribution in your Tweets because it's proper net protocol, using a Twitter user's name lets the person know you've shared a blog post of theirs. If the person didn't know you before, they do now. Getting known is how you get the influencers to follow you and how you network to build relationships.

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1-800-913-0988.

all information is required please

Twitter for lawyers: TweetDeck application is your answer

Twitter for lawyers TweetdeckYou've heard about other lawyers and marketing professionals using Twitter. You think they've lost their mind when they tell you they find Twitter an effective networking and communications tool. You've tried Twitter. You're convinced others have lost their mind, 'Twitter is the dumbest thing ever.'

If you're like me, looking at the Twitter interface and trying to make sense of that madness, it's easy to reach those conclusions. It was only after going to the well on Twitter for the 3rd or 4th time and using a Twitter application (think Firefox as a browser for the Internet or Outlook for email), that Twitter started to make sense.

After trying other Twitter applications, Geeklawyer, a London Barrister, turned me onto TweetDeck. TweetDeck rocks.

With TweetDeck, Twitter has become one of the most effective networking, PR, and reputation building tools at my disposal. I am generating significant new work for LexBlog via 'small talk' exchanges on Twitter. Small talk about personal affairs. Small talk about business. And small talk passing on stories I see (social media).

What's TweetDeck?

A desktop application you download to a a Mac or PC that aims to evolve the existing functionality of Twitter by taking an abundance of information, i.e twitter feeds, and breaking it down into more manageable bite sized pieces.
Twitter for lawyers

How's it do it?

TweetDeck enables users to split their main feed (All Tweets) into topic or group specific columns allowing a broader overview of tweets. The far left column will always contain All Tweets. The GROUP, SEARCH and REPLIES buttons then allow the user to make up additional columns of groups of Tweets. Once created these additional columns will automatically update allowing the user to keep track of a twitter threads far easier.
Twitter for legal marketing

Just imagine if we told someone 10 years ago lawyers would need about things like Google, blogs, and Twitter to market and network effectively. Amazing world.

Twitter can work to generate new business for the every day practicing lawyer

Twitter for Lawyer Law FirmsRick Georges posted today that Twitter may work for guys like Kevin O'Keefe, but not for the day to day practicing lawyer like him.

Rick's post followed Chuck Newton's comments that 'A small part of [Twitter] might be beneficial but most of it is not.'

Bottom line is individual lawyers need to decide what works best for them. Some will find Twitter a good fit in their quiver of networking, PR, business development, and marketing tools. Others may not. But let's not lay out rules that this works or that this doesn't to legal professionals who may be looking to us for wisdom.

I just don't buy that for everyday practicing lawyers Twitter is not useful. I was told as a small town lawyer in rural Wisconsin in 1996 that the World Wide Web and the Internet were no place I should be wasting my time. 'No one uses the Internet, especially the blue collar type clients I wanted as a plaintiff's personal injury trial lawyer - and especially in rural America where no one has even heard of the Internet.'

Well, turned out folks were wrong. I figured out by the seat of my pants, guided by a love of helping folks, how to answer relevant law questions at AOL, archive the questions and answers at my website, lead law chats at AOL, and more. Doing so lead to plenty of good work and a state wide reputation in 18 months.

Imagine meeting local reporters and business people you could not even imagine would be using Twitter as a customer service, relationship building, or investigative tool. They're there. Imagine local people following you (people you do not know) that think you are a pretty good person/lawyer and spreading word of your law blog posts around the community via Twitter.

Will it be most reporters and most community members that you'll connect with through Twitter? Of course not. Who cares? I'll take 1% of them who amplify my message. It doesn't suck.

I didn't get Twitter the first, second, or third time I looked at it. I thought for a year plus it was the dumbest thing ever. But when I saw a lot of business people, far brighter than this kid, talking about how Twitter worked for them, I kept experimenting with Twitter.

At some point Twitter clicked for me. It can click for everyday lawyers too.

Give me Twitter as a practicing lawyer in any town in America and I'll run laps around offline marketing and many lawyers using blogs alone.

For guys like Chuck and Rick who think the 'Tweets' (140 character limit) are unmanageable, use Twhirl or TweetDeck (my preference) as an application to access Twitter. Your Twitter home page, something I never go to, is unmanageable as a means of following conversation on Twitter.

For me Twitter is nothing like Chuck's experience that it felt like listserv content overload. I'll take Twitter over the blather I hear on some listservs. On Twitter I control who I want to listen to. I can even group those I follow by subject and monitor only words I want to see.

Twitter's been a good ride for me. And though I am not an everyday lawyer, Twitter is now in the top three tools generating new business for LexBlog. I don't see why a practicing lawyer can't do the same.