Death of social networking for lawyers is greatly exaggerated

Remember the late 90's when many in the legal profession dismissed the Internet as some sort of fad?

A recent article article in Law Technology News (Is the Party Over for Social Networking?) and blog post by Martindale-Hubbell ('social networking – does not draw lawyers') reminds me of the same. Both write off lawyers use of social networking.

This at a time when LinkedIn, the leading professional social networking site, lists 118,000 profiles from those describing themselves in the practice of law and is profiling each of the largest law firms based on social networking at LinkedIn by their lawyers.

Interesting that many quoted in the Law Technology News story see the advantages and significant growth in social networking for lawyers. Nonetheless, the headline was couched to create the opposite impression.

And the headline certainly worked. New York Magazine citing the Law Technology reported 'News Attendees at the American Bar Association's ABA Techshow in Chicago have declared social-networking sites over.' No question the magazine put this in to laugh at our profession.

Martindale's position that social networking for lawyers is dead? Probably based on a combination of not knowing what is taking place and protecting their territory.

Rather than create sensational headlines to generate discussion or misleading lawyers to sell your products, let's give social networking time.

It's new. Social networking sites are still being perfected. Lawyers and legal marketing professionals are still trying to figure it out.

But like the Internet, social networking for lawyers is not a fad.

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1 800 913-0988.

all information is required please

Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News [LexBlog Q & A]

Today's guest for the LexBlog Q & A is Monica Bay, an award-winning journalist and attorney currently serving as editor-in-chief for ALM's Law Technology News. Based out of New York City, Monica is also the author of two blogs: The Common Scold and EDD Update.

Her position at the intersection of law, technology and journalism makes Monica a prime subject for this interview series (which since its inception has focused heavily on each of those three issues). Her insights did not disappoint, and are available after the jump.

1. Rob La Gatta: In September, you cited the AmLaw Tech survey, which said that 33% of AmLaw 200 firms are using blogs. Do you expect this continue to rise? Any predictions as to how or when?

Monica Bay: Blogs will continue to rise in popularity, with creative uses. For example:

  • Tom Baldwin, previously of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton [and] now with Reed Smith, helped establish blogs at SMRH as a vehicle to promote 12 practice areas, ranging from Antitrust to Fashion & Apparel. Many were originally e-mail newsletters, he has said, that were changed to blogs. One direct benefit is that the firm doesn't have to worry about spam filters, which often interfered with subscriber receipt of the newsletters.
  • K & L Gates was one of the first firms to establish an eDiscovery Law blog,
  • and in the wake of Katrina, New Orleans' McGlinchey Stafford set up a Hurricane blog (and also has a class action blog).
As law firms become increasingly comfortable with the technology, they will use blogs for everything from recruiting to administration to promoting practice groups to marketing their expertise. Blogs, when properly executed, provide an opportunity for both individuals and groups to showcase their "wares." Blogs provide a fast vehicle for firms to exploit (in a good way) significant events (such as Katrina) to show leadership and business development finesse.

2. Rob La Gatta: Can you offer any ideas as to why, by and large, bigger firms tend to be more resistant to attorney blogging than smaller ones?

Monica Bay: I'm not sure that's true anymore. The one thing that does hamper large firms is that they tend to be paralyzed by "Firm-speak"; I often see that when large firms submit articles to Law Technology News. Blogs will fail if the authors must be vetted by committees or marketing execs, who want everything to be bland "happy talk" with the word Firm capitalized even in the middle of sentences.

Blogs, by their nature, need spontaneity and spirit...and you rarely get that if you must go through a food chain to post. As firms begin to better understand the potential to build and develop new (and existing) markets with blogs, I think you will see them become less paranoid about letting authors speak freely.

3. Rob La Gatta: What is Law Technology News' (and the ALM's) position on blogs? Will we ever see blogs featured more prominently on the LTN homepage?

Monica Bay: While I am not the spokesperson for ALM policies (that's the terrain of our CEO Bill Pollak), there's no question that ALM and LTN have both been enthusiastic pioneers in the blawgosphere.

We immediately recognized the potential of legal blogs, and launched the Law.com Legal Blog Network, which promotes and monitors legal blogs. I was the first ALM editor to debut a solo blog, and we now have several, including group and solo efforts, such as:

with more to come. My two blogs are prominently listed on the LTN website homepage, and the Legal Blog Network is prominently featured on Law.com's home page.

4. Rob La Gatta: As a journalist operating in the legal realm, do you see the line between lawyering and reporting getting thinner? Is it feasible that one day, blogging lawyers will be considered the most reliable reporters in a given niche?

Monica Bay:
I think it all boils down to "res ipsa loquitur": the thing speaks for itself. The entire concept of media is changing, and ultimately, readers will assess the value of content based on its quality and credibility. Lawyers don't need to call themselves "reporters" – they can simply stand on their own credentials.

With Internet-based content from a variety of sources available to all, uber search tools will be increasingly important. Credentialed journalists are not the only folks offering content...but their role as gatekeepers, as filters, as trusted advisors will become increasingly important as the glut of information increases.

For example, there have been some debates about the role of bloggers influencing U.S. Supreme Court decisions (which I personally think is a good thing). If we believe that the best decisions are made when you have the best, most thoughtful, most authoritative information, then there's room for everybody at this party.

5. Rob La Gatta: You update The Common Scold quite frequently. Do you think being a blogger gives you a better understanding of their application and value?

Monica Bay: Absolutely. I manage two blogs, one that is multi-author and fast paced, with short brisk items (EED Update, co-produced with Sean Doherty of Law.com); the second that is more personal, opinionated and eclectic (The Common Scold) .

Each of the two has a different goal and purpose. For example, I pontificate more on my own blog, where EDD Update covers everything from our experts' commentaries to vendor press releases. Each is a valuable vehicle. Blogs really are blank canvas, with room for Picasso and Jasper Johns. Everyone can have different mission.

Interested in hearing more? Recent LexBlog Q & A posts:

Or, see our full list of legal blog interviews.

Blogger's press passes for LegalTech New York

ALM LegalTechAmerica Lawyer Media's Law.com isn't passing out press passes to all bloggers for ALM's LegalTech New York (LTNY). But they're doing the next best thing by showcasing your blog posts relating to LTNY on law.com.

How's it work?

  • Law.com, in cooperation with Law Technology News magazine, will devote Law.com's Legal Blog Watch Web page and newsletter to LTNY coverage from Tuesday through Thursday, Feb. 5-7, offering a central clearinghouse for LTNY-related blog coverage.
  • If you'll be blogging at LTNY, email law.com with the name of your blog and bloggers.
  • Law.com post about all blogger-participants.
  • After you post on your blog, send them the URL with an intro sentence about the post to legalblogwatch@alm.com . (Include your name, blog name, phone number, and email address in case they need to contact you)
  • The Legal Blog Watch editor will post the blog posts in a style similar to that of the EDD Update Blog.
  • ALM will highlight the LTNY Special Edition of Legal Blog Watch on Law.com, the Law Technology News website, Law.com Legal Technology and their associated blogs: EDD Update, Sean Doherty's Law.com Legal Technology and Monica Bay's The Common Scold.

In addition, per Per Monica Bay, Editor-in-Chief of Law Technology News,

[ALM is] offering free full confererence passes to all bloggers who are journalists, analysts or consultants, who plan to blog during LTNY. Not just journalists.

Vendor bloggers are also welcome to participate in our LegalBlogWatch three-day LTNY marathon, and join us at the Weds morning gathering, but we cannot offer vendor bloggers full conference passes.

Email requests for press pass credentials to LegalBlogWatch@alm.com by noon on Monday, Feb. 4, and pick up your credentials at LegalTech registration during the show.

Bloggers aren't being recognized as journalists across the board by ALM, something that can get folks like me up in arms. But looking at some law blogs, I can understand why.

Finally, all bloggers are welcome to join ALM, Law.com, and Law Technology News on Wednesday, from 9-10 a.m., for an informal bloggers gathering at the Pettite Trianon Room, on the 3rd floor of the Hilton. They promise to provide lousy coffee and mediocre Danish.

Maybe I ought to be attending. I had not planned to do so. After attending in '06, I had nightmares for 2 weeks about E-Disvovery vendors attacking me from both sides of narrow aisles. Nothing wrong with e-discovery software of course, I just have no use for it.