Building relationships with reporters through your blog

Earlier this week, John Schwartz, the National Legal Correspondent for the New York Times, wrote a story on the implications of social media for lawyers. I a disagreed with the underlying message of his story and blogged my position.

Schwartz being a good reporter was monitoring his name or the url of the story from nytimes.com via a blog search and a newsreader. Perhaps, the New York Times uses a more sophisticated means to follow what is being said about their stories. In any case, the folks who work there are smart enough to monitor what is being said about them and their work product on the net.

A day after my blog post I got an email from Schwartz commenting on what I said. I reply via email with my position and though we may disagree on this issue, I asked if he'd be interested in having lunch next time I was in New York City. He responded, 'Sure.' I then connected with Schwartz on LinkedIn so I'd remember to look him up when I head to New York.

Now what are the odds a snot nosed kid who grew up and practiced law in a small town on the Mississippi River gets the chance to meet the the National Legal Correspondent for the New York Times when he goes to New York? John can make light of the fancy title, but to me, meeting folks like this is still a big deal.

Imagine I don't have a blog. After reading the story, I call up John and say 'Hey, I think you're out to lunch on that story, let me give you my two cents, let's exchange emails, let's connect on LinkedIn, and when I am in the city, let's do lunch.' Maybe John says great. But many reporters would say 'who the hell are you?' And I don't think I would have had the balls to do it.

But my blog allowed me to express my view, connect with John, and meet him down the road. I'm establishing a relationship with an influencer when it comes to the law. Reporters at major publications have that status.

What does that relationship do for me? I don't know, but I'll take it. Maybe John uses me as a source to get info on a story he's doing (truth be told, he did call me last week on the above story). Maybe I get to share my views on how lawyers can network through the Internet to help others, do practice development, and improve the image of the legal profession. In that those are the things that get me out of bed each morning, that's good.

I see so many law firms and other companies hiring PR agencies to pitch things to the press and line up interviews for their principals. Maybe it's a great way to get news coverage and an excellent way for reporters to work up a story. But it's awfully expensive and establishes no meaningful relationships between reporters and sources.

LexBlog's been around for six years. We've never sent out a press release nor hired a PR person. I've talked to countless reporters, editors, and publishers in the trade press trade as well as in the mass media. Many have become friends. It's all come about through my blog, as I used it here, and now Twitter.

PR professionals, especially those who know how to use social media and social networking, remain a great resource to law firms and other companies. But using your blog to build relationships with the press can go a long way.

Lawyers are often scared to death of the press, afraid they'll say something that'll get them in trouble or be 'misquoted.' Law firm communications professional are often charged with controlling communications with the press. 'No one talks with anyone unless it's vetted by me.' That's nuts.

Reporters, editors, and publishers are people just like you and me. They have a job to do and they like doing that job with people they know, people they like, and people who can be a great resource for them. Your blog can get you to be one of those people.

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1-800-913-0988.

all information is required please

NY Times misses boat on legal ethics versus lawyers online activity

By now, a lot of you have seen the New York Times' national law reporter John Schwartz's Sunday story entitled 'A Legal Battle for Lawyers - Online Attitude vs. Rules of the Bar.' What a disservice to the American lawyer and the public we serve.

With thousands of lawyers making a positive difference in other's lives through the effective use of the Internet, Schwartz uses as the basis for his story isolated incidents where lawyers have run into trouble because of ill-advised blog posts.

  • Hot headed Florida lawyer, Sean Conway, 'was steamed at a Fort Lauderdale judge, so he did what millions of angry people do these days: he blogged about her, saying she was an 'Evil, Unfair Witch.'
  • Illinois lawyer, Kristine A. Peshek, 'wrote posts to her blog in 2007 and 2008 that referred to one jurist as 'Judge Clueless' and thinly veiled the identities of clients and confidential details of a case, including statements like, 'This stupid kid is taking the rap for his drug-dealing dirtbag of an older brother because 'he's no snitch.' '
  • Frank R. Wilson, a lawyer in San Diego, caused a criminal conviction to be set aside and sent back to a lower court because of his blog postings as a juror.
  • A Texas lawyer, after getting a trial delayed because of a death in the family, caught the wrath of Judge Susan Criss of the Texas District Court in Galveston when he posted on his Facebook page about 'One night drinking wine, another night drinking mojitos, another day motorbiking,' during the week of the funeral.

So what do we have?

  • Tens of thousands of American lawyers blogging so as to share legal information with the public and accelerate the pace of legal discourse among the profession.
  • Probably hundreds of thousands of people in the legal industry (lawyers, law professors, law students, law librarians, legal marketing and communication professionals, knowledge management & other law firm administration folks) using Facebook to network with friends and peers.
  • Ten thousand or more legal professionals using Twitter so as to discover the people they'd like to get to know or know better.
  • Over 600,000 users of LinkedIn listing the 'practice of law' as their profession to network with peers, industry leaders, reporters, conference coordinators, clients, referral sources, and the the lke.

And a Sunday New York Times story highlighting the online stupidity of four lawyers with quotes from leading legal ethics professionals saying that when you, as a lawyer, behave like an idiot online, you can get into trouble.

Let's not leave our common sense at the door when it comes to lawyers' use of the Internet and online social media. Sure, the net and social media are new for lawyers. So was the telephone, the fax machine, cell phones and email. Despite some early hysteria about the dangers and legal ethics of those four, we've learned to adapt.

The cat is out of the bag on the legal profession's use of the net and social media. The shouting of legal ethic's issues by the ill informed is not going to put it back in the bag. And that's a good thing for lawyers and the American public.

So when you hear of the very isolated examples of problems with lawyers' use of the net, keep it in perspective. People, even good people, will do dumb things. But the good things achieved by lawyers through the use of the net and social media far outweigh the bad.