<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Dan Slater - Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/articles/cool-stuff/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:55:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Endorsement by WSJ</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I asked Rupert over cocktails last week if he could do something to endorse the concept of 'Real Lawyers Have Blogs.' </p>

<p>This <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/05/01/lawyers-blogging-on-cases-good-or-bad/">from Dan Slater at the WSJ Law Blog</a> looks pretty close. Too bad they cut my head off.</p>

<center><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/05/01/lawyers-blogging-on-cases-good-or-bad/"><img width="300" vspace="5" height="300" align="middle" src="http://kevin.lexblog.com/blog_art_257_20080501095002.jpg" alt="Real Lawyers Have Blogs" /></a></center>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/cool-stuff/endorsement-by-wsj/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/cool-stuff/endorsement-by-wsj/</guid>
<category>Cool Stuff</category><category>Dan Slater</category><category>WSJ Law Blog</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:55:20 -0800</pubDate>
<author>kevin@lexblog.com (Kevin)</author>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>