Best in Law Blogs : The LexBlog Network : January 24, 2012
January 24, 2012
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today’s roundup is quite heavy on United States v. Jones, a Supreme Court ruling that says placing GPS tracking devices on vehicles constitutes a search and requires a warrant. Really, commentary on that from every angle. Also, on the lighter side, check out DuetsBlog for a marketing review of every Super Bowl logo. Total posts on the LexBlog Network today: 166.
- Sony Makes Inroads into Health-Care in a Big Way – Chicago lawyer Geoff Cockrell of McGuireWoods on the firm’s blog, The Healthcare Investor
- What Does The Supreme Court’s “GPS Decision” Mean For Private Employers? – San Francisco lawyer Philip Gordon of Littler Mendelson on the firm’s Workplace Privacy Counsel
- California’s Right to Repair Act: What teeth does it have when its requirements are not followed? – San Diego attorney Nicholas Neidzwski of Cozen O’Connor on the firm’s Subrogation & Recovery Law Blog
- 7 Ways the Grimm Act Will Help Wall Street Steal – Intake specialist Owen Dunn of The National Whistleblowers Legal Defense & Education Fund on their Whistleblowers Protection Blog
- The Business Implications of the U.S. v. Jones GPS Tracking Decision – Jacksonville lawyer Chanley Howell of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Privacy & Security Source
- Warrant Necessary for GPS Tracking Says Supreme Court – Seattle attorney Michael Ryan of K&L Gates on the firm’s blog, TMT Law Watch
- Supreme Court: Attaching GPS Tracker to Suspect’s Car Constitutes Search For Purposes of Fourth Amendment – Washington, DC lawyer Michael Beder of Covington & Burling on the firm’s blog, InsidePrivacy
- Super Bowl Logos: A Marketing Review – David Mitchell of Norton Mitchel Marketing on DuetsBlog
- Supreme Court Decision in Warrantless GPS Tracking Case Offers Little Guidance in Consumer Privacy Context – Washington, DC attorney Christopher Wolf of Hogan Lovells on the firm’s blog, Chronicles of Data Protection
- Taking Note of How Family and Medical Leave Act Interference Claims to be Decided – West Bloomfield lawyer Jason Shinn of E-Business Counsel on his blog, Michigan Employment Law Advisor
Posted in: