Header graphic for print
Real Lawyers Have Blogs On the topic of the law, firm marketing, social media, & baseball

Social influence to replace links as measurement of importance on Google and the Internet?

Could lawyers and law firms be betting on the wrong horse when it comes to creating an effective Internet presence?

When you mention an effective Internet presence, most law firms think of search. How do we achieve higher search engine rankings for our website and blogs.

I blogged about the importance of links to achieve higher Google rankings earlier this week. Accordingly, most law firms, or companies doing search engine optimization (SEO) work on a law firm’s behalf are chasing links. Some are doing it the proper way, some in underhanded ways.

But what if links are not the long term answer for getting seen? What if it becomes the power of your social network that determines your importance and getting seen on Google?

Rather than people voting on your importance by linking to your content, we’ll use social influence to measure your importance on Google and on the Internet.

Today, it’s the relevance and value of incoming links that determine how important your website or blog is in Google’s eyes. And the more important you are, the higher you appear in search engine rankings.

Could we be on the verge of social influence being the measuring stick of your blog or website’s importance? We’d measure importance in search and Internet relevance by the number of ‘Facebook likes’ and the number of people sharing your content on Twitter, LinkedIn, and other information and social networks.

My gut tells me we are in for this change. Shouldn’t a tacit endorsement from someone who’s respected on the net (algorithms will be created to measure ones level of respect and influence) be a more valuable than a link from a link farm created solely to achieve search rankings?

Steve Rubel, SVP, Director of Insights for Edelman Digital, blogs this morning that it’s entirely possible that the ‘Like’ could replace the ‘Link’ as the leading signal measuring importance on the net.

For years the mighty hypertext link has served as the web’s traffic signal network. Links guide where our clicks, attention and, therefore, money flows. It has given rise to multi-billion-dollar businesses and even entire industries. As the blockbuster AOL/HuffingtonPost deal shows, we truly do live in what Jeff Jarvis calls “The Link Economy.” But maybe just maybe that economy could be peaking.

More recently it appears that an equally powerful network of signals has emerged just as certain kinds of links are being called into question in the mainstream press. Enter the like, which Facebook CTO Brett Taylor embraced in 2007 while with Friendfeed and Facebook copied in 2009. It has since flourished under Taylor’s lead at Facebook as it mushroomed to 600 million users. These millions have not only emphatically embraced the like on the social network itself, but more importantly across the millions of sites that use Facebook’s social plug-ins. Some 65 million Facebook users like things daily.

Rubel’s logic is similar to mine.

Unlike the link, however, likes arguably are arguably easier to create. Moreover, they are explicit endorsements rather than implicit ones. Therefore, they carry more weight once they are pulled through the lens of our friends. More so than links, this new network of signals allows content to find you, rather than you having to go find it.

Neither Rubel nor I expect that Google’s viewing links as a signal of importance is going to go away over night, or perhaps ever. It’s just a real possibility that social influence will become equally, if not more important.

The implications for you as a lawyer or law firm is to acknowledge that it will no longer be possible to cram social influence like you could cram for SEO via links.

Law firms are notorious for procrastinating or deferring to the ‘committee for really slow action’ the work the firm needs to do to achieve search results and Internet relevance. Bad as it that is, a law firm could still cram for results by hiring a SEO expert and executing on an SEO plan.

But as in the real world, online social influence that comes by building out a social network takes time. Lawyers will need to be personable, transparent, authoritative, and real through blogging, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook.

It’ll take time to develop a comfort and gain experience with this sort of social networking. Being liked and viewed as a reliable and trusted authority on the Internet is not something you can cram for.

  • http://blog.simplejustice.us shg

    I suspect your talking about “real” likes, rather collecting friends on Facebook or followers on twitter, which are nearly worthless as far as establishing any sort of clout.
    Sadly, I doubt that’s what Rubel is talking about, as so many social media pundits, self-proclaimed “rock stars,” merely rack up numbers and gain at best sycophants of no worth whatsoever. Granted, it allows them to feign importance among people who count such “likes”, but like our old pal, @Rex7 with his 75,000+ twitter followers, he still can’t find a job. If only he could eat his twitter followers, he would never go hungry again.

  • http://www.zenlegalnetworking.com Lindsay Griffiths

    Great post, Kevin. As I’m sure you can guess, I hope it does go this way – I’ve found that for me, building networks over time and sharing their work and mine has been hugely beneficial. Both to me, and my company’s brand.
    I do hope law firms get on board on a larger scale – I did a survey and an attorney told me that RSS feeds were one of the tools they used for social networking. Sigh. We have a lot of work to do.

  • http://Http://Kevin.lexblog.com Kevin

    Rubel’s not bad Scott. Steve made a name for himself based on his good work and commentary long before people valued their importance by the number of followers they had. I confess the first thing I thought of was people hiring people to go out and get people to click like buttons for them — or better yet to write software to do it for them.
    Google has people that are far brighter than I working their Lindsay. They know the import of social influence on the net and they are also smart enough to build something that’s not too easy to game. I got to believe we are headed this way.

  • http://www.legal500.com/firms/402/offices/2443/lawyers/21681 IBB Solicitors

    Google’s algorythm is constantly being updated and refined. You are right, the back link is no longer seen as the be all and end all for SEO and improving Google rankings. A quality over quantity approach is needed.
    Many SEO practitioners would agree with you in that the social element is becoming more and more important on the Internet. Google arguably already does this – I read somewhere that links posted on Twitter get spidered quicker by Google.
    One of the most important things in Google’s eyes is ‘authority’ and ‘trust’ – these are largely associated with high profile, well respected websites. In years gone by this would be easily translated as pagerank, but it’s a little more complex now. It will be interesting to see how Google could encode ‘authority’ into someone’s ‘like’ (i.e. would a ‘like’ from President Obama be deemed more worthy than a link from Average Joe?). It should be stressed that whilst Google and the Googlebot is extremely intelligent and complex – it is at the end of the day not a human and that brings limitations on how to manage the ranking of websites.

  • http://wardblawg.com Gavin Ward

    An exceptional article as always Kevin.
    “My gut tells me we are in for this change. Shouldn’t a tacit endorsement from someone who’s respected on the net (algorithms will be created to measure ones level of respect and influence) be a more valuable than a link from a link farm created solely to achieve search rankings?”
    -if you’re gut is telling us something, I think we should listen to it!
    Best wishes
    Gavin

  • http://blog.larrybodine.com Larry Bodine

    Kevin – you are right on the money. Search Engine Land – http://selnd.com/ifbiSJ- says that search engine marketing just officially became social engine marketing. Google is baking “friends’ activity on Twitter, Flickr, and other platforms (other than Facebook) into the top search results users see. In some cases, “The social search element will change a page’s ranking — making it appear higher than ‘normal,’” reports Search Engine Land. “The ranking impact will be different based on how strong your connections are, and different people will see different results.”

  • http://www.legalmarketing.ca Doug Jasinski

    When Kevin O’Keefe says jump, Google says “How high?”
    I kid, but only a little. Hot off the Google blog is the official confirmation of Larry Bodine’s comment above – updates to Google Social Search that will increasingly prioritize content that touches your social network.
    Here’s the link: http://bit.ly/hyKAVQ

  • http://blog.simplejustice.us shg

    The birth of a new scam industry, social engine marketing. Yay.

  • http://www.PluggedInLawyer.com TracyTC

    Google has to keep its finger on the pulse of relevance. If it’s not returning relevant results, it’s losing users and ad revenue. As we’ll all recall from high school, public opinion is (sadly) very relevant to most people. Polish up your crown, we’re going back to the future.