<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Connecticut&apos;s legal ethics attack on Total Attorneys a step backward for consumers | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/11/articles/law-firm-marketing/connecticuts-legal-ethics-attack-on-total-attorneys-a-step-backward-for-consumers/</link>
<description>This week the State of Connecticut began hearings on whether five attorneys violated state ethics rules by participating in an Internet advertising program run by Total Attorneys. Cast in the light of protecting consumers, Connecticut&apos;s action is another step backward...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:29:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>tracy@pluggedinlawyer.com (Tracy Thrower Conyers)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A step backward for consumers and a black eye for lawyers.  There is already a perception that we are techno-neanderthals.  Any interpretation by a governing body that says this form of internet marketing violates lawyers' rules of ethical conduct highlights exactly how antiquated our rules are (if indeed, the State ultimately finds for the complainant).  Let's hope good sense prevails.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/11/articles/law-firm-marketing/connecticuts-legal-ethics-attack-on-total-attorneys-a-step-backward-for-consumers/#6006197</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/11/articles/law-firm-marketing/connecticuts-legal-ethics-attack-on-total-attorneys-a-step-backward-for-consumers/#6006197</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:29:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
