<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Martindale-Hubbell ups the ante : Price tag for lawyer to display rating online goes from $50 to $599 | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/10/articles/law-firm-marketing/martindalehubbell-ups-the-ante-price-tag-for-lawyer-to-display-rating-online-goes-from-50-to-599/</link>
<description>I received word from a law firm marketing and client development professional that, effective this January, the LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell lawyer directory is increasing the charge by 1,200% for displaying lawyer ratings for lawyers who don&apos;t subscribe to Martindale-Hubbell. For decades...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:55:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:52:41 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>diydivorce.fl@gmail.com (Pamela)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I've received 3 "last chance" emails about the $50 fee recently. When I thought about it though, I've NEVER seen Martindale-Hubbell as a referral source for my site or blog in my analytics and no client has ever listed them as the referral source.</p>

<p>I'm using the $50 to take a referral source out to lunch. I think it's better spent that way.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/10/articles/law-firm-marketing/martindalehubbell-ups-the-ante-price-tag-for-lawyer-to-display-rating-online-goes-from-50-to-599/#5593945</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/10/articles/law-firm-marketing/martindalehubbell-ups-the-ante-price-tag-for-lawyer-to-display-rating-online-goes-from-50-to-599/#5593945</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:55:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
