<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Lawyers and social media : It&apos;s the big 3 | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/</link>
<description>Social media and social networking is the all the buzz in the lawyer marketing world. Every place I presented this year on &apos;Social Networking for Law Firms&apos; told me they had the largest attendance, or close to the largest, they&apos;ve...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:29:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:26:57 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>david.williams@kutakrock.com (David )</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  I've been on Twitter heavily for last week [@DavidWms]- came originally for the Mad Men character play - following you and other lawyer/brand guys. Fascinated, I see the power but still pondering how it will translate for most lawyers, specially mainstream litigators.    </p>

<p>But you've convinced me I need to complete my LinkedIn profile that is woefully incomplete.  </p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2124401</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2124401</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:41:11 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>max.kennerly@beasleyfirm.com (Max Kennerly)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I just don't know about Twitter. I'm sure it works wonders for Guy and Scoble -- the primary business for both of them is to exert influence over the most wired 0.1% of the country, all of whom are on twitter. The perception that they are always on top, always on the bleeding edge, is very important to their business.</p>

<p>Not so important to my business nor, I believe, to most lawyers. They need (1) a good reputation among clients and lawyers and (2) to be noticed by potential clients.</p>

<p>I don't see how Twitter provides any paradigm-shifting benefits to either. It helps you connect in a near-real-time, highly personable manner to maybe a couple dozen people. For most people, it's microblogging, which is like blogging except without the benefit of showing any sort of expertise or ability, just endlessly links and pithy comments.</p>

<p>I can see the merits, but, well, I don't see it as a major part of a lawyer's marketing strategy.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2124961</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2124961</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:06:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>stelios.antoniou@neocleous.com (Stelios Antoniou)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article i will research and find more about Twitter. I also believe that social websites are importand. The question is that will this Twitter be helpful to my colleagues.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2126826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2126826</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:43:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>johncorcoran@gmail.com (John Corcoran)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This blog posting has convinced me to (finally) give Twitter a shot. I just signed up and am going to see how I like it. I also have a blog at greenlegal.blogspot.com and may be calling on you someday to fancy it up and make a decent blog of it. Thanks for the recommendation!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2131116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2131116</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:43:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>kevin@lexblog.com (Kevin OKeefe)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for comments. Twitter is tough to see uses at first and is certainly something than an individual needs to get a feel how they could best use.</p>

<p>Few thoughts responding to questions/concerns.</p>

<p>Twitter expands my influence way, way beyond those who twitter. 95% of the people in this country are influenced by 5% in their purchasing and decision making process. No question the info I share and word of me gets passed to people who do not use twitter from the people who do.</p>

<p>Business lawyers are getting business from meeting people on twitter. That's fact, not just rumor. One Milwaukee lawyer got 5 business clients in 6 weeks off twitter.</p>

<p>Twitter allows to meet with and network with lawyers and other business associates. I see a ton of personal and professional development taking place via discussions taking place on twitter.</p>

<p>In case on Bill Marler, a plaintiff's trial lawyer who does foodborne illness work, getting on Twitter, he had experts and government officials connecting with him on twitter within a day of when he started. He sees upside in that.</p>

<p>If I were still practicing, I would be sharing info and links to spread my brand as an authority in a niche and as a way to build a community of like minded people - clients, prospective clients, and influencers of those 2 groups.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2131590</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2131590</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:52:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>doug@dougcornelius.com (Doug Cornelius)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin -</p>

<p>Great summary. You know I am a big fan of Twitter. My one concern is its business model (or lack of one). They do not have any revenue and I have not heard of any model for generating revenue.</p>

<p>At some point in the near future, Twitter will change. I am on the ride for now.</p>

<p>As for ignoring other sites, I am more open than you. In part because a year ago I thought it was two modes: blogs and facebook. Twitter was less useful and LinkedIn was less dynamic. A year from now, our lists of top sites will probably be different again. (Except for blogs)</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2140892</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2140892</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>jamie@reverbconsulting.com (Jamie Baker)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed your post. The info was good, practical and good to hear you experience with the tools. I am surprised and a little skeptical that lawyers are interested, though. Not to be prejudiced toward lawyers.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2148988</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2148988</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:33:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>supercool586@yahoo.com (Viceroy)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What's Alltop?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2165408</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#2165408</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:31:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>angie@socialimg.com (Angie Barbour)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks for the great post.  I am currently assisting a couple of smaller law firms with their online image and this was very helpful. Lawyers like to hear lawyers recommend before they themselves become adopters. Thanks!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#3616925</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#3616925</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>rarbel@gmail.com (Rafi Arbel)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>

<p>I enjoyed meeting and hearing you speak at the Get a Life conference in Chicago. </p>

<p>With regard to your position that 5% of the people influence the buying habits of the other 95%, I couldn't agree with you more. That pattern is what Malcolm Gladwell discusses in The Tipping Point, How Little Things Can Make A Big Difference. Specifically, he explains why word-of-mouth is so powerful an influence.</p>

<p>Many argue that the thought leaders across a wide range of disciplines are now using twitter to communicate and establish their reputation as a subject-matter expert. </p>

<p>Determining a metric to measure the ROI of social media may be difficult at this embryonic stage in its development. That said, few who make the necessary investment question its commercial value in establishing a professional on-line presence and creating a personal brand for their practice.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#4535414</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/12/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-and-social-media-its-the-big-3/#4535414</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:29:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>