<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Moderating law blog comments : The New York Times protocol | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/08/articles/blog-basics/moderating-law-blog-comments-the-new-york-times-protocol/</link>
<description>For law firms looking to establish a standard protocol for moderating comments on their blog (not everyone can take the Greenfield or O&apos;Keefe do as we feel approach), the New York Times standard may be apropos. The New Times frequently...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:11:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:58:29 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>lukegilman@gmail.com (Luke)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Comment moderation could be even trickier for blogging lawyers. A good policy statement near the comment box could head off some potentially expensive misunderstandings, particularly when it comes to potential client interactions and disclosure of sensitive information. I'm amazed at how often people put potentially sensitive information in a blog comment rather than just e-mailing me.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/08/articles/blog-basics/moderating-law-blog-comments-the-new-york-times-protocol/#1148789</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/08/articles/blog-basics/moderating-law-blog-comments-the-new-york-times-protocol/#1148789</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:11:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
