<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Law firm blog policy : LexBlog&apos;s sample | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/blog-law-and-ethics/law-firm-blog-policy-lexblogs-sample/</link>
<description>LexBlog is routinely asked for a sample law firm blog policy. My approach has been too cavalier. &apos;Why do you need a policy for something that is just a different medium for communication? Law firms need to look at their...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:22:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:00:18 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>jessica.christina84@gmail.com (jessicachristina)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Does the firm need to restrict blog content? Some firms may wish to restrict blog content to be general and informational similar to email newsletters and alerts. Other firms may wish to take a more progressive, and usually more successful, approach to blogging by linking to and referencing other blog posts and news stories. By doing so, you're joining the conversation as an authority in your field. Depending on the circumstances, lawyer(s) may wish to avoid taking too strong position on a particular legal topic. Generally, you don't want to be blogging about existing clients and matters that members of the firm are working on.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/blog-law-and-ethics/law-firm-blog-policy-lexblogs-sample/#1170147</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/blog-law-and-ethics/law-firm-blog-policy-lexblogs-sample/#1170147</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>rmeeuwsen@aol.com (Richard Meeuwsen)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article for those lawyers thinking of starting a blog. Your point are all nicely sequenced in order.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/blog-law-and-ethics/law-firm-blog-policy-lexblogs-sample/#1186282</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/05/articles/blog-law-and-ethics/law-firm-blog-policy-lexblogs-sample/#1186282</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:22:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
