Header graphic for print
Real Lawyers Have Blogs On the topic of the law, firm marketing, social media, & baseball

Never write a law blog for the search engines

A lot of lawyers publish blogs for the sole reason of achieving high search engine rankings. Their blogs show it.

You’ve seen these blogs – or maybe you haven’t as word of such tasteless marketing doesn’t spread across the net or generate links as is the case with well done law blogs.

They’re the blogs with post titles with keyword spam repeating the lawyer’s area of practice and location. They’ll have categories repeating the same keywords over and over. And the posts, rather than serving up something worthwhile look like the lawyer is trying to one up the next worse lawyer.

No one’s told those lawyers what Lorelle VanFossen at Blog Herald is preaching, that being that viewers come to your blog for 3 reasons.

  • Search Engines
  • Links
  • Word of Mouth

Lorelle explains:

Google ain’t the only game in town. We know that, though many are still staking their business and reputations on the old Google Game thinking. You have to mix things up in order to cover the more important part of building traffic and encouraging readers to return – and bring their friends with them.

You have to write for your audience. You have to write to, for, and with your readers. It is the power they hold over you to link to you and spread the word about your site that makes or breaks your blog.

Visitors come from three sources:

If you wrote for search engines only, then you would only be paying attention to one out of three.

And I agree with Lorelle as to which of the three is most important.

Word of Mouth is the most powerful form of marketing, even more powerful now than ever in history. We have the capacity to reach thousands of people within seconds. If our message is clear and viral, worth spreading around, those thousands tell their friends and their friends tell their friends, and they all descend upon your blog.

Blogs written for search engines stick out like a sore thumb. Power users of content, thought leaders in the field who are blogging and reporters, are totally turned off by such blogs.

Law blogs engaging in an ongoing conversation among such thought leaders and reporters get plenty of subscribers. Word of mouth and links are generated thereby.

Lawyers who think blogs are all about the search engines and blog for the search engines are misguided. Anyone coaching lawyers to write blog posts for the search engines is giving bum advice.

Good bloggers write for their audience.

  • http://www.blawgreview.com Ed.

    You mean, like this?
    Isn’t this more like it?

  • http://kevin.lexblog.com Kevin OKeefe

    Exactly like that. I’m sorry to say that Plaintiff’s trial lawyers, which I was for 17 years, are notorious for spam titles on blogs.
    Trying to describe the nature of where you are located and what you do in each post title is crap. If the lawyer thought sponsoring urinal cakes with his 800 number on him would generate calls, my guess is he’d be up for that too.
    Amazing that some lawyers have been able to bring tasteless marketing to blogs. I thought giving of oneself on a law blog was the perfect way of marketing a practice and one that could never be construed as tasteless. Guess I was wrong.

  • http://www.themichiganlawyer.com Michigan Divorce Attorney

    Kevin,
    Very nicely put. One thing you are so right about is when an attorney writes a blog for the search engines and not for their client, it is very obvious and boring. The whole point to a blog is to engage people and get them to keep coming back for more information. Don’t look at the small picture, look long term and you will be successful.