<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on More risks in using Blogger : Lock out and no personal support | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/</link>
<description>A few days ago I posted on why not to use Blogger for a law firm blog. This morning I ran across another risk in using Blogger. Austin&apos;s Thom Singer relayed a situation where his Blogger blog, which he uses...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:41:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:00:23 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>samuelhasler@yahoo.com (Sam Hasler)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I was also picked as a spam blog.  I was not exactly locked out but I did have to do the word verification each time I posted.  I have been looking to leave Blogger and this has made me a bit more determined to do so.  Quite honestly, my intention of moving has been partly from posts like yours but also I am finding the Blogger design tiresome.  I am not so sure that the general public has much problem with blogger and there are a lot of lawyer blogs on Blogger.  I think Blawg Review is on Blogger. So my family law blog will probably stay on Blogger or stay there longer.  My business law blog is moving.  Business clients, I think, may have more a problem with Blogger and I am having a problem presenting what I want to present on Blogger.  Now, I need to get out and make some rent money. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1024737</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1024737</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:25:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>kevin@lexblog.com (Kevin OKeefe)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments. Discussion from all parties on the use of Blogger is real helpful to lawyers thinking of getting started with a blog. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1025457</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1025457</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:48:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>firm@harrismoure.com (China Law Blog)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It is also usually blocked in China, which at last count, had more than 1.3 billion people.  </p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1028736</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1028736</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:13:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>stupidsheetguy@aol.com (Jimmy)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree. I had always thought Blogger was a good platform until the moment I found my blog "locked" as a suspected spam blog. It took the wind out of my blogging sails, so to speak, since at the time, I was using the blog to document the last days of my Father in Law's life.</p>

<p>I barely look at Blogger any more.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1223941</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/04/articles/blog-basics/more-risks-in-using-blogger-lock-out-and-no-personal-support/#1223941</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:41:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
