<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Law firm video on websites : Immediately irrelevant | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/03/articles/law-firm-marketing/law-firm-video-on-websites-immediately-irrelevant/</link>
<description>Immediate irrelevance. That&apos;s an accurate description of 90% plus of the video&apos;s law firms will run on their websites. And that&apos;s not my characterization of law firm video. This from a marketing technology person at one of the largest firms...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:52:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:35:03 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>conniecrosby@gmail.com (Connie Crosby)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like some of the examples you have linked to have already been pulled.</p>

<p>I think Hull & Hull, an estates firm here in Ontario, is getting close to effective video use with their Hull & Hull TV, which supplements their blog and podcasts: <a href="http://www.hullandhull.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hullandhull.com/</a> .  The newest edition is video of their breakfast series.  They tend to target other law firms in addition to clients and potential clients.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/03/articles/law-firm-marketing/law-firm-video-on-websites-immediately-irrelevant/#963776</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/03/articles/law-firm-marketing/law-firm-video-on-websites-immediately-irrelevant/#963776</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:22:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>jk@fluentsimplicity.com (JKash)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, Kevin. You're point is right on target: if someone chooses to implement video (or any other social application for that matter), make sure to do it right! </p>

<p>Video, in and of itself, is offers intangible value to communications. Video > Audio > Words. The manner in which it is produced and implemented makes all the difference. Take the “law TV” Connie mentions. It speaks to current issues and forms a knowledge basis for future reference. I love that it’s given away freely. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/03/articles/law-firm-marketing/law-firm-video-on-websites-immediately-irrelevant/#963880</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/03/articles/law-firm-marketing/law-firm-video-on-websites-immediately-irrelevant/#963880</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:52:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>