<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Lawyers Weekly article the latest in Chicken Little | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/</link>
<description>Law firms ought to be scared to death of the dangers presented by employees using social network sites and personal blogs. So says Kevin Lo, an e-discovery expert, in an article in LexisNexis&apos; Lawyers Weekly. Lo raises a couple salient...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:43:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:43:32 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>erwiest@wiestlaw.com (Edward Wiest)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You should make clear that the "Lawyers Weekly" you linked to is a _Canadian_ publication, not the US family of publications including Lawyers Weekly USA and Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.  I doubt the US publications of this name would be publishing a piece with these conclusions.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/#911966</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/#911966</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>kevin@lexblog.com (Kevin)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning that Edward. While practicing, I subscribed to Lawyers Weekly USA and found it to be an excellent publication.</p>

<p>Turns out this Lawyers Weekly publication out of Canada is a LexisNexis company. Fitting in that LexisNexis knows little about blogs nor social networking.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/#912269</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/#912269</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:38:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>jkash@skadden.com (Jonathan Kash)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is classic. While everyone at a firm should use discretion when posting content (Facebook profiles do have a lot of garbage), banning "2.0" is ridiculous. This reminds me of the NAR economist that was telling people the housing bubble will never burst.</p>

<p>"Hackers and spies?" Did Lo confuse social engineering with social networking?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/#912830</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2008/01/articles/law-firm-marketing/lawyers-weekly-article-the-latest-in-chicken-little/#912830</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>