Government Contracts Law Blog latest addition to Sheppard Mullin's stable of blogs

With the recent launch of their Government Contracts Law Blog, the lawyers and attorneys at Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton continue to solidify themselves at the forefront of large law firms that blog.

The Government Contracts Blog, which launched just over a month ago, is written by lawyers from the firm's government contracts & regulated industries practice group. Working with clients involved in contractual agreements with the federal government, the attorneys from this practice group were recognized in 2006 by Chambers & Partners as one of America's leading business practices.

Though the details of such contracts can be difficult to explain in layman's terms, the lawyers behind this blog are able to do so through their informative, organized updates  and simple category titles. These categories include:
Not surprising, considering how long Sheppard Mullin has been in the blogging game. They currently operate 11 blogs, covering a range of issues and practice areas:
And they aren't done yet. Keep your eyes on Sheppard Mullin in coming months, as they continue to launch new blogs with LexBlog.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/31/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsHappy Halloween, LexBlogosphere readers and contributors. Unplug that computer this evening and go have some fun.

Among the updates for October 31, 2007 are these fine posts:
Meanwhile, in his Bankruptcy Litigation Blog, Chicago attorney Steve Jakubowski of The Coleman Firm also published a two-part update of bankruptcy readings (one for each of his 1-month-old twin sons):
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Bill Marler featured in Wall Street Journal Law Blog again

Peter Lattman seems to be as big a fan of Bill Marler's blog as we are. For the second time in less than a month, Bill is back in the headlines at the Wall Street Journal's Law Blog again this morning.

Last time WSJ Law Blog readers heard from Bill, he was criticizing the USDA for claiming that America's meat supply is the safest on the planet. Today's update finds him on another adventure in his ongoing battle against companies that poison their customers. Earlier this month, after a Minnesota woman died from eating E. coli contaminated meat at Salem Lutheran Church in Longville, Bill filed a lawsuit against Nebraska Beef (who produced the tainted meat).

Business as usual for this Seattle lawyer, until the unexpected kicker: Nebraska Beef, in response, filed suit against the church - Salem Lutheran was negligent, they say, for not preparing the fatal meal properly. This didn't sit well with Bill: he was livid, and used his blog (as well as the comments section on this morning's post) to explain the absurdity of Nebraska Beef's suit.

Lattman even acknowledges that he gives Bill "lots of airtime," and offers a three-tiered line of reasoning for being such a fan:
(A) we can’t get over his wife’s vanity plate, (B) we’re interested in interesting niche legal practices and (C) his blog entertains us.
Yet another reason that niche practices, and by extension niche blogs, are a key to legal success. Through developing a powerful reputation in the food safety industry, Bill is acting as an agent of change. And nothing enhances a reputation better than being featured in a blog like Lattman's.

Technorati indexing spam blogs becoming huge problem

Technorati Spam BlogsTechnorati, once the leading RSS aggregator of blog RSS feeds, is now indexing a ton of spam blogs. It's been a big problem the last week plus.

If Technorati does not correct the problem fast, it's going to be their demise - if Google and it's Google Blog Search isn't already accelerating that demise.

Spam blogs are a big problem. Folks like me who subscribe to RSS feeds of searches of keywords and key phrases at Technorati are getting a ton of spam text from these spam blogs in our RSS newsreaders. As bloggers and media professionals we're power users of information. Clean feeds, free of spam, are of critical importance in browsing relevant information and Internet discussion.

Google Blog Search, as opposed to Techonrati, is indexing few, if any of the spam blogs. My RSS feeds of searches from Google Blog Search are clean and free of spam text.

Ironic part is that the vast majority of spam blogs are built on Google's Blogger web based blog publishing platform. Google Blog Search, thriving on the unlimited server capacity, engineering talent, and resources is able to tackle the spam blog problem. Intentional or not, Google is killing off Technorati by sending Technorati's servers more spam than they can handle.

If Technorati does not clean up their index shortly, I am going to unsubscribe to my RSS search feeds at Technorati. Technorati, once an integral part of my life, will become irrelevant. I'm sure I am not the only one who will do so.

That's unfortunate as Technorati was once a wonderful platform driven by some passionate and talented folks.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/30/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsSome great posts to highlight today, from leaders around the legal blogosphere. Good to see some of our clients who've taken a brief hiatus getting back into the game.

The discussion for October 30, 2007 includes these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

6 reasons large law firm blogs beat law firm websites with RSS feeds

A few large law firms are starting to allow users to subscribe to articles via RSS feeds. This is a plus as no one is going to return to a firm website to see what's new. In addition, we're getting so much email, the last thing we need is an email alert/newsletter from a law firm.

But if these large law firms, and their web site providers truly understood how to harness RSS, they'd be using blogs to disseminate their content. Here's a number of reasons.

  • Content on a website is much less likely than blog content to appear high in search engine results when relevant searches are performed by in-house counsel, exec's, the media, and other interested parties.
  • Website content must be promoted. Word of a blog with valuable content spreads across the Internet by virtue of news sites and other blogs citing the content.
  • Website content is generally seen only by existing clients. Blogs, akin to an online magazine on a niche subject, are read by clients of other firms, lawyers at other firms, the media, and other bloggers.
  • Over 20% of senior exec's in this country read one business blog a week and the number is growing. How many exec's read law firm articles?
  • Measure of influence is quickly becoming of critical importance for web content by places like Google Blog Search. Influence is determined in large part by being cited by other blogs and news sites with RSS feeds. Law firm articles will not be cited.
  • Innovative companies, large law's targeted clients see blogs as innovative. Law firm articles/alerts, whether including an RSS or not, are looked at as more of the same. 'All law firms do that.'

Large law and their marketing consultants are often afraid of blogs. Usually because of ignorance of what blogs are, what they're not, and how they are being used by innovative firms. The result is going half way, such as 'RSS'ing the website,' but in reality just falling further behind the curve.

Tags:

Martindale-Hubbell ads claim its lawyers.com directory has the 'Best Lawyers?'

Sure looks that way in Martindale-Hubbell's Google ads for their consumer and small business lawyer's directory, lawyers.com. Doing a search for the Best Lawyers directory, here's what I found at the top of the Google's first page.

Martindale-Hubbell lawyers.com

Martindale-Hubbell is buying sponsored links from Google so that when someone searches Best Lawyers, their lawyers.com directory under the heading 'Best Lawyers' appears at the top of Google's search results. Doesn't happen on every search for Best Lawyers, but it's in the Google ad rotation as of Monday night.

Martindale-Hubbell has been a legacy product. It's been the standard bearer as far as lawyer directories. Martindale's peer reviewed ratings is the ratings system we all grew up with as lawyers. Now they are promoting a directory which is open to any lawyer who purchases a listing in lawyers.com as having the best lawyers? In an effort to beat out the Best Lawyers directory when Best Lawyers is searched for at Google?

The Best Lawyers and Super Lawyers lists have historically been subtly dismissed without mention by Martindale in Martindale's surveys claiming it to be the most trusted lawyer directory by far and away. Martindale may not have dissed these lists openly, but there's no question the company has enjoyed the legal communities perception Martindale was above the fray of lists claiming to have the 'best' or 'super' lawyers.

But now we have Martindale buying ads at Google, the number one place where consumers look for lawyers, to get a sponsored link for 'Best Lawyers' on top of Google's organic search results for the Best Lawyers directory. And any reasonable consumer seeing the ad would conclude Martindale is claiming to have the best lawyers in its lawyers.com directory.

Martindale would be better served by going back to its roots. It's what brung you. Claim that you are the legacy directory of choice, the directory that's above the fray of claiming to have the best lawyers. Claiming to have the 'best lawyers' is fraught with peril for Martindale.

Will lawyers have ethical concerns about being listed in a directory now claiming to have the best lawyers when there is no review of the lawyers included in lawyers.com? Will state governing bodies attempt to sanction or limit the use of lawyers.com because of its new claim like has happened in New Jersey with Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers.

No, Martindale hasn't bought ads claiming it's lawyers.com lawyers are 'Super Lawyers.' And don't be surprised if Martindale drops its ads claiming lawyers.com has the 'Best Lawyers.'

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/29/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsAs anyone who knows baseball is probably already aware, the Boston Red Sox won their second World Series title in four years yesterday. Don't know about you, but I thought the Boston/Colorado pairing made for one of the least exciting matchups in recent memory.

The news for October 29, 2007 includes these updates:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Law firm online advertising sucks : Firms need to become media players

Taking the lead from Steve Outings, the publisher of a network of citizen-media-driven websites, in a post at Editor & Publisher, law firm online advertising, as is the case with other companies, sucks. Law firms, as Steve advises other companies, need to become media players through the use of blogs.

Buying sponsored links at Google, effective for a few firms, is very expensive, never ending, and not trusted by the majority of Internet users. Banner ads, whether at Martindale-Hubbell's lawyers.com or other places are as cheesy as billboards on the side of a road. Web sites tend to be shrines to the firm, streaming little, if any, helpful information to current and prospective clients. And how many of you trust the SEO consultants who are selling snake oil to uninformed buyers.

Law firms need to take a lead from companies like Nike, the subject of a recent New York Times article, for their Internet efforts. Steve characterized Nike's use of blogs as becoming a 'media enterprise, not only producing content, but creating running (and other sports) communities, and producing useful online tools for athletes.'

Stefan Olander, Nike's global director for brand connections, said 'We want to find a way to enhance the experience and services, rather than looking for a way to interrupt people from getting to where they want to go. How can we provide a service that the consumer goes, 'Wow, you really made this easier for me'?'

Plus, as Steve point out Internet advertising is not trusted.

A global study by Nielsen Research released this month, based on research of more than 26,000 online users, showed that Internet advertising is near the bottom of the list in terms of how much it's trusted by consumers. Print newspaper ads did quite well, coming in second place with 63% of people saying they trust them. TV commercials and magazine ads placed a few percentage points behind. Search ads were trusted by 34% of consumers, and banner ads (still the stalwart at most newspaper sites) were trusted by just 26% of respondents.

What was No. 1? Word of mouth. (WOM means not only friends telling friends about products and services that they recommend, but being empowered by the Internet to share their recommendations with a broad and loose group of 'friends' who may belong to online communities of people with shared interests. WOM also includes all the consumer reviews -- e.g., book and product reviews by consumers on Amazon.com -- that people now rely on so heavily to make purchasing decisions.)

Of course your law firm doesn't have the marketing budget of Nike. You don't need it. The vast majority of law firm Internet advertising is so pathetic, that a focused and concerted effort on your part will make you a shining star.

How does your law firm become a media enterprise? By producing and disseminating content in the same way large companies are doing so - via blogs and RSS. Focused blog content cited by other bloggers and the main stream media creates a word of mouth buzz about your firm that's much more effective than other Internet advertising. And it's something you can be proud of as a lawyer - unlike a shlocky banner ad.

I agree with Steve that companies, law firms included, are going to find they do not need traditional media as much, because they can reach their target audiences directly themselves.

Live blogging the World Series - it's allowed!

Blog World SeriesUnlike the College World Series, the World Series can be live blogged from the stadium. Not me (I wish), but Ray Krueger of the New York Times.

As I blogged this summer, the NCAA ejected Brian Bennett, a writer for The Louisville Courier-Journal, when he refused to stop blogging a college baseball playoff game. Did so on the basis that live coverage rights were sold to ESPN.

Hard to believe Bud Selig is smarter than the NCAA when it comes to blogs. Maybe it's Rupert Murdoch's Fox Sports, which is broadcasting the World Series, being a lot smarter than Disney's ESPN, which had the live broadcast rights to college baseball. Murdoch, a huge proponent of user generate content, is not nearly stupid enough to get caught up in something as nutty as outlawing live blogging from sporting events.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/28/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsI've managed to pull together five posts from around the LexBlogosphere today for our abridged Sunday post. Look for updates to start flowing again once the week begins tomorrow.

The discussion for October 28, 2007 includes:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/27/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsWelcome to another weekend, and another abridged version of our daily LexBlogosphere updates.

Among the few posts for October 27, 2007, we have:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Live LexBlog blogs from 10/15-10/26

Over the past two weeks, LexBlog has watched as many of our clients - from private practitioners to large, national firms - launched new blogs. Here's a recap of what went live between Monday, October 16 and today:

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/26/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsCheck out Kevin's blog later this afternoon to see a list of all our blog launches for this week and the last...you might find something you'll want to subscribe to.

The blog updates for October 26, 2007 include these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Lawyer's Guide to Marketing on the Internet, Third Edition

Internet marketing lawyersThe The Lawyer's Guide to Marketing on the Internet, published by the ABA is just out in its 3rd addition.

It's authored by Greg Siskind (the godfather of Internet marketing for lawyers), Deborah McMurray, and Rick Klau. I've spent time with each of these folks. They're not only first class people, but very knowledgeable when it comes to Internet marketing for lawyers.

Greg's taken a law firm on the net probably further than anyone I know with his immigration firm started just over 10 years ago with nine offices around the world. Deborah's got her own legal marketing consultancy and last I saw her she was called into a meeting at LexisNexis Martindale to advise on their Internet strategy. And Rick's done so much, he's landed at Google after Google's acquisition of his last company, Feedburner.

Topics covered in the book include:

  • How to increase your firm's visibility through the latest technology, including Web Logs, podcasts, Web seminars and virtual meetings.
  • How to develop effective promotional, informational and interactive content.
  • The importance of an attractive, well-branded site and "Web site irritations" to avoid.
  • Tips and tricks of doing e-mail marketing the right way.
  • Why you need a Web blog.
  • Definition of technical terms for quick reference.
  • Developing an Internet marketing plan that supports business development.
  • Budget-friendly ways to market your firm online.
  • How your site's image communicates with prospects, clients, colleagues, the media and opposing counsel.
  • Advertising and search engine optimization.
  • Measuring results.
  • Marketing tips to help younger firms grow.
  • The ethics of client development through technology.

I laud you guys for not stooping to the word 'Blawg,' but 'web log,' when referring to a blog is so 2004'ish. ;)

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/25/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsToday's update will be quick, as I'm in the middle of mid-terms and managed to sneak away from study groups to a quiet place.

The discussion for October 25, 2007 includes these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Bookmark a blog? Are you nuts?

Just read an article in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune that was described as the '411 on blogs' for those folks who don't understand what a blog is.

Looked interesting until I read "When you find a blog you enjoy, it's common to bookmark that page so you can return often and with ease."

Are you nuts? Bookmarking blogs would only be done by someone with a lot of time on their hands. You know, here's a lot of bookmarks on my browser and I spend all day going back to blogs I like to see if they posted anything new. 'Nope, nothing new today, I'll check back tomorrow and now on to the next blog in my bookmarks.'

You subscribe to blogs. You do not bookmark them. When a new post is made to a blog you like, the new post will automatically be streamed to your newsreader where you collect RSS feeds from other blogs, news sites, and keywords & key phrases you follow from Google Blog Search.

The busiest people in this country read blogs. It's not the people with time to kill that browse around to blogs. They read blogs because they can get targeted information fed to them.

It's a search, browse, and subscribe Internet society today folks. We've moved on from the search and browse world.

Law librarians play integral role in law firm marketing

Jason Eiseman, a computer automation librarian with the Portland law firm of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, picked up on the attention law librarians were getting at Above the Law.

And more than just a perk for lawyers, as referenced by Above the law, Jason nails the law librarian's role in law firm marketing.

I certainly hope attorneys realize the value librarians bring to their practices. Librarians can assist with legal research, business development and marketing, competitive intelligence, and more services. The best moments I have in my job are when an attorney tells me that I've made them look good in front of a client, and hopefully I do that often.

I'm talking with more and more law librarians and law firm knowledge management folks about professional marketing blogs for their firms. The reason being that these professionals are capturing content on niche areas of the law and distributing it among the appropriate lawyers in the firm. Seeing the value of this intellectual capital not only to lawyers in the firm, but also to clients, prospective clients and influencers of those two groups, law firms are turning to blogs to syndicate this content.

As the New York Times reported awhile back, being a law librarian is hip these days. Especially when you help your law firm grow its business.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/24/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsSlow day in the LexBlogosphere today, but we've got enough client posts by noon to throw together our daily update.

The discussion for October 24, 2007 includes:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Lawyers don't have time for Facebook

FaceBook for lawyers and law firmsWith a few folks I respect (Doc Searls, Rob Hyndman, an attorney, & Greg Storey) discounting the value of Facebook to them, I'll add that I don't see the value of lawyers spending time on Facebook for networking etc.

I'm registered at Facebook. I've played with it a little because of the buzz and all the invites I receive to be friends from others at Facebook. But with invites from people I don't even know and tens of invites to join groups which I have no clue how to use, I just don't get the value. And there's little, if any, risk in LexBlog losing business in my not participating.

From Doc:

The 'friend request' list... is one I've whittled down from a much higher number. If I could gang-whittle them, I might be more interested, but the routine still involves declining to check off which of many different ways I met somebody ('both owned the same dog', 'set up by a mutual ex-boss' or whatever), and other time-sucks. Not to mention that the site takes many seconds to load, or to bring up email, or whatever. At least for me.
.....

Anyway, life's too short, and this list of stuff is too long. If you're waiting for me to respond to a poke or an invitation,or a burp or any of that other stuff, don't hold your breath. Or take offense. I've got, forgive me, better things to do.

From Rob:

I've read recently expressing dissatisfaction with the Facebook experience for one reason or another. I'm barely on Facebook any longer. Early adoption works both ways, I think. We're going to see more of this. We did already, actually - in Bubble 1.0.

And in only the way Greg can make a point,

Now I find myself in new awkward territory with more and more requests by other business owners, peers, and professionals to become "friends" inside these same social sites and I don't quite fully grok this new layer of "networking". Does it really matter that I've posted a note on someone's page? Are we missing out on some large contract because Airbag is on Virb but not MySpace? Should I cry myself to sleep because I'm not in someone's top three, five, eight, whatever? Second Life sucks--oops, can I say that with my outside voice and not be an outcast?

My gut tells me that no, no one is really loosing business because they aren't actively participating in some sudo electronic version of RL (in real life) but it makes for an Ok mind-numbed distraction.

Facebook is a force in our society. It has financial value as a company. Millions find Facebook an enjoyable way to pass time. That's great.

But as a something lawyers need to participate in so as not to lose work, I don't see it.

Update: As I write this, I am presenting at an ALM/National Law Journal webinar on lawyer marketing via 'Web 2.0' and social media tools. Carolyn Elefant, who's done extraordinary things marketing herself as a solo attorney, and Mark Britton, CEO & cofounder of Avvo, an online lawyer directory, have both highlighted the merits of Facebook during their presentations. They're also citing some lawyer successes with Facebook. More to come. Maybe I'll be proved to be a Bozo again.;)

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/23/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsOne of today's posts - while technically published yesterday - was sent in as a content submission from Susanne Gross at RenewData. It's an interesting read on a recent Illinois case.

The updates for October 23, 2007 include:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Lawyer blogs, like entreprenuers, must focus on a niche

Kim Gordon, a marketing veteran of 26 years, may as well have been talking to lawyers with poorly focused blogs, when writing on the importance of a niche for entrepreneurs in this month's Entrepreneur Magazine.

Most successful marketing tales begin and end with a well-plumbed niche. In other words, the marketer has found the most-qualified group of prospects and motivated them to action. You'll rarely see a company that's risen to the top using a shotgun approach--targeting a mass audience indiscriminately--yet this is where many entrepreneurs trip up.

Failure to isolate the most-qualified niche can waste marketing funds, time and energy. I get e-mails and phone calls from entrepreneurs who tell me 'everybody' can use their product or service. The trouble is, even the most well-financed business can't afford to reach everybody at once. And even if they somehow could, their message would have to be so generic that many different types of prospects wouldn't feel motivated to take action.

Just look at the way big businesses individually target their niche. Wireless companies, for example, have marketing campaigns that pitch small businesses, families and young adults. Each of these audiences constitutes a different niche that warrants its own set of campaign tactics and messaging.

Dam, does that sound like lawyers who are deathly afraid of getting too focused on a niche area of law for their blog for fear they'll lose that one client outside their niche. You know why do a Seattle Immigration Law Blog when you can have the whole country or the world?

Having the immigration blog most widely read by individuals and businesses in Seattle as well as people emigrating to the Seattle area because you are dedicated to helping these people is simply not enough. You may miss that one case of someone one from Hungary to Miami who would read your national immigration law blog and hire you.

Sounds nuts, but I hear this stuff all the time. If it were me, I'd be thinking of a niche inside of immigration law, and perhaps then going a step further and localizing it. That's how you establish a reputation as the 'go to' lawyer for your target audience.

Heres a couple of Kim's tips, with a little massaging from me.

  • Sharpen Your Focus. Take a long, careful look at your current client base and divide it into groups with similar characteristics. Figure out what your best clients have in common. This will define a niche market of individuals who are more likely to become customers or to make repeat purchases.
  • Fill a Need. Focus on the client you want to reach. Who has an identified need for your legal services? Who is buying something similar now? It's easier to fill a need than to create one, so smart marketers look for potential buyers who know what they want and are buying it elsewhere.

Sure there's risks in going after a niche. But those risks are less than those associated with being all things to all people. And the rewards - enhanced reputation, speaking engagements, media quotes, & growth in the work you love - make it all worthwhile.


LexBlog Q & A: Marcus Peacock of the Environmental Protection Agency

Today's very special guest in the LexBlog Q & A hot seat is Marcus Peacock, Deputy Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Marcus who was nominated by President Bush in June 2005 and took over the post shortly thereafter operates The Flow of the River, a blog detailing developments within the Agency. He is one of a growing number of government officials who use blogs to interact with the general public (Kevin listed a few in a post earlier this month). Check out our e-mail interview below.

1. Rob La Gatta: Tell me about how The Flow of The River first got started. How long ago did this happen? Was developing an EPA blog your idea, or somebody else’s?

Marcus Peacock: We've got 17,000 employees at EPA. The sheer number means it can be frustrating trying to communicate with them. In the course of a conversation at a wedding last spring it struck me that blogging could be a worthwhile way to communicate with EPA employees, and everyone else who might care, about how the Agency does its work and is performing. Some folks were skeptical given how few government blogs existed at the time (and none by a political appointee). So I tried to let go of it. But I couldn't. So I used my prerogative as the Deputy Administrator to set it up.

It's working so far because, in part, I stick to what the scope of my blog is and don't go wandering off, as fun as that might be. My blog's about what I work on and see as a Deputy Administrator. I don't try and provide the same information that comes out of the Office of Public Affairs or other parts of the Agency.

2. Rob La Gatta: You seem to have the art of blogging down to a science – guest bloggers, short posts, links, etc. How did you learn how to adjust your writing style for the web?

Marcus Peacock: That's nice of you to say. I've gotten a lot of good advice from the web team at EPA. As far as the writing, I still see room for improvement. Fortunately, my natural writing style fits this medium. Most people have the problem of writing too much in a first draft and then cut it back. I have the opposite problem. I tend to be too short, too clippy. So I often have to add words after my first cut. I'm more Hemingway, less Hawthorne.

3. Rob La Gatta: Today many Americans are untrusting of and cynical towards government organizations. You’ve wrote that you started the blog to “make what [the] EPA does more open to the public.” Do you think taking this approach of entering into discussions within the blogosphere could potentially bridge the gap between governing and governed?

Marcus Peacock: No.

That's a first draft answer.

4. Rob La Gatta: Come November, you’ll be opening the blog up for direct comments from readers. What prompted this move, and how do you expect the blog to change – if at all – once commenting is allowed?

Marcus Peacock: I've wanted to be able to post comments from the beginning, but a lot of questions were raised regarding, for instance, who would moderate the comments and how much it would cost. Rather than tackle all that, I just wanted to get the blog up and running to see if it would even work, comments or no. Well, it does seem to work and be of interest, so now we're able to focus on taking the next step and post comments.

I expect four things to happen. First, we'll get a lot of comments and then it will die down to a lower steady state. Second, I think a lot of people will want to comment on EPA's policies rather than the main topic of my blog, our operations. Third, I expect I will have to resist the temptation to spend more time responding to comments and questions. I'm already spending enough time on this compared to my other duties. Finally, and most importantly, I think comments will make it a richer and more interesting discussion, especially among commenters, and that can't be anything but good.

5. Rob La Gatta:
In regards to the 2008 election: more than any election in America’s history, the Internet (and blogs in particular) is proving to be a powerful and important campaign tool. Do you think this web-based, user-influenced approach is the new face of politics? Will we ever see a presidential blog on the White House website?

Marcus Peacock: I don't think it will be THE new face of politics, but it is an additional face of politics that will continue to grow. Like television before it and radio before that, politicians will increasingly figure out how to use this medium to communicate to the people. But it only joins other tools, it won't replace them.

I will be very surprised if we don't see a blog out of the White House at some point in the next few years, although I'll be surprised if we see one by the President. It takes a fair amount of time and effort to create a worthwhile blog. I doubt the leader of the free world is going to have that kind of time.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/22/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsToday marks the beginning of the final full week in October, as we edge closer to the official holiday season (though it would appear that Costco has jumped the gun...I'm already starting to see Christmas decorations at their local warehouse here in Seattle).

The discussion for October 22, 2007 include the following updates:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/21/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsBarely five entries in my list of LexBlog client updates this morning, but not surprising - Sunday is always the slowest of the week.

The news for October 21, 2007 includes these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Legal reporter blogs tell more

A legal beat reporter's blog may be more effective than a story in the next day's (week's in some cases) newspaper, per Wayne Ezell's story in this morning's Jacksonville Times-Union.

Among other reporters, Ezell referenced the work of reporter Gordon Jackson, who blogged from inside a Georgia courtroom about a high-profile murder case and highlighted the advantages of reporter's blogs.

First, the reporter provides more information and insight than can be found in news stories constrained by space and the restrictions of traditional straight-forward writing style.

Jackson wrote in greater depth about the trial of physician Noel Chua, for example, providing more details about each witness's testimony than would get into the print edition.

.....

Second, blogs foster interactions with readers, even from afar...

.....

Finally, blogging allows writers to be more informal and more venturesome in their reporting, even as they take care not to lapse into commentary and opinion.

I agree wholeheartedly with Times-Union Editor, Pat Yack, "Done right - timely and crisply - blogs do have a great value."

Some lawyer's blogs become very, very profitable

Don't let it go to your heads as a means to escape the practice of law, but some blogs are very profitable.

One of which is TechCrunch, founded by former Wilson Sonsini lawyer and tech entrepreneur, Michael Arrington. Sam Zuckerman features the TechCrunch blog (now media company) in this morning's San Francisco Chronicle.

In 2005, when Silicon Valley entrepreneur Michael Arrington started TechCrunch, his popular blog on Internet startups, he saw it mainly as a chance to indulge his obsession with young technology companies. But it turned out that Arrington had latched onto something big. TechCrunch became the go-to site for the scoop on new Web companies.
.....
Today, TechCrunch has a full-time staff of eight. This year, it hired a CEO. In August, 1.25 million people visited TechCrunch or its affiliated blogs at least once, according to comScore Inc. It brings in $240,000 per month in advertising, according to Arrington, and pulls in additional revenue from conferences and parties. Most important of all, TechCrunch is in the black.

What's even more interesting, per Zuckerman, is that blogs, something still dismissed by major publishers as ranting diaries, are morphing into a major publishing force.

From the blogosphere's anarchistic roots, a professional cadre is emerging that is creating an industry whose top-performing businesses now earn serious money. The industry is expanding at warp speed. Blog-based media could just be poised to elbow aside traditional print and broadcast outlets to become one of the dominant sources of news, information and opinion, many observers believe. 'As traditional media continue to contract, this stuff is going to expand,' said Steve King, senior fellow with the Society for New Communications Research, a Palo Alto think tank. 'The business models have caught up and you're starting to see little blog publishing companies that frankly are becoming not so little.'

The blogging world has tremendous strengths - original voices, provocative opinions, imagination and intimate knowledge of a variety of subjects.

Admittedly, blogs such as TechCrunch and GigaOm, also highlighted in the Chronicle are the exception. The vast, vast majority of blogs do not create any significant revenue. Talking this week with a blogger at b5media, a global blog network, he believed that one could crack the top 100 in blog revenue by earning fairly low sums.

Key though is Zuckerman's point that blogs have great strengths, law blogs included. "..[O]riginal voices, provocative opinions, imagination and intimate knowledge of a variety of subjects," make it possible for law blogs to supplant traditional print legal media, which is going to continue to contract.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/20/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsCelebrating Saturday with another update from the LexBlogosphere, where there were enough posts this morning that finding five to highlight was no trouble at all.

Among the updates for October 20, 2007 are these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Law bloggers are journalists

That seems to be the consensus on the blogosphere, at least as to Howard Bashman and his How Appealing blog.

The whole discussion arose out of Bashman's publishing a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a case filed by a Sept. 11 detainee. Turns out the case was filed under seal because of national security issues. The Court mistakenly made the decision public. A court clerk called Bashman asking him to take the discussion down from his blog. Bashman declined arguing as a journalist and member of the media, he needed to keep a post up which thousands had already seen, emailed to others, and blogged about.

Regardless of what folks think about Bashman's refusal, whether as a journalist or officer of the court, there's not much argument that as a law blogger, folks believe Bashman is a journalist.

  • Matthew Felling at CBS' Public Eye: As far as this writer is concerned, Bashman fits the bill.
  • Law Professor Daniel Solove at Concurring Opinions: I believe that anybody can be a journalist -- a journalist is what a journalist does. In other words, being associated with a mainstream media entity doesn't determine who is a journalist and who is not. One doesn't need to be part of any organization to report information to the public.
  • Law Professor Eric Goldman, commenting at Concurring Opinions: If we were building the law from scratch today, there is no way we would try to "privilege" journalists from other types of content publishers and disseminators. That distinction is simply too incoherent in an era where everyone has equal access to an infinite audience.
  • Mark Obbie at LawBeat of The Carnegie Legal Reporting Program at Syracuse University: Bashman's backbone is even more admirable than the average journalist's -- if put in a similar position -- because Bashman's day job depends on the good graces of appellate courts. When the government overreaches to keep the public's business secret, journalists must stand up and be counted. That's easier when the worst they can do is be mad at you. Bashman did more.
  • The Blog of the Legal Times: Bashman then took the classic stance of journalists in opposition to government secrecy: "In my role as a member of the news media, I determined that it would be inappropriate to take down my posting of the decision based on a general claim that the opinion, issued earlier in the day to the public over the internet, referred to information contained in an appendix whose contents remained under seal."

Not much question either following Wikipedia's definition of a journalist:

A journalist is a person who practices journalism, the gathering and dissemination of information about current events, trends, issues and people.

As an aside, today I'm unable to pull up Bashman's posts on the subject (or any of his posts after 10/8/07) so not certain what is transpiring.

Irish law, technology and social blogs

Ennis Irish law blogsI worked in a solicitor's office in Ireland (Ennis, Co. Clare) for almost a year back in 1982 - my first job as a lawyer. That was long before the Internet and blogs. Heck, we were lucky when the phone company wasn't on strike and we had working phones.

Today, Ennis is called a technology hub, something hard to believe from the market town I remember.

Anyway from Ireland's Daithķ Mac Sķthigh and Brooke Powell, here's the latest in Irish bloggers.

I need to get back to Ireland one of these days. Never thought I may be doing so to look up something called a law blogger.

3 traits of successful law blog - focus, passion & originality

Karl Long, a Web/Social Media Integration Manager at Nokia, identifys 3 traits of a successful blog - focus, passion, & originality. They apply equally to what makes for a successful law blog.

Karl's 3 keys, with my comments:

  • Focus. Lack of focus is the number one mistake lawyers make in their blogs. Lawyers ask me all the time why they are not drawing clients from their blog. When I look at the blog, it's got posts on a broad range of topics - so broad that few, if any, people would subscribe because the blog has must have content on a niche subject. Plus, as Karl asks are new viewers stumbling onto your blog going to understand in 2 seconds exactly what your blog is about? If not, you'll have no success in building readership.
  • Passion. Ain't no way you'll continue to take time away from your family and law practice if you're not passionate about the topic. Blogging is a marathon, not a sprint, so you better love the race. Plus your passion comes through in your writing, readers are attracted to that. As a trial lawyer, the key to success was conveying my passion to members of the jury. If I believed so strongly in my case, a few of the jurors would too. They would convey my case to other jurors. Same with blogging. People with a heart love passion, they'll convey your passion and beliefs to others through their own blogs. Word of you and what you do will get spread across te net.
  • Originality. As Karl says, "Original content and original ideas in the blogosphere stand out like beacons in the night, and not to labor the metaphor but they also attract other bloggers like moths to a flame." You need not post original content from scratch. Some of the best blogs reference something a lawyer has read. But providing your original take, or at a minimum, your original summary (with a few comments) are key. There's got to be something original about your blog posts that gets readers to subscribe.

Lawyers who believe passion and originality only apply to non law blogs are mistaken. Lawyers doing eminent domain, insurance coverage, and creditors rights work have blogs exhibiting passion and original content. As a result their reputations as trusted and reliable authorities have grown and their business has increased. Have some faith, the traits of focus, passion, and originality are keys to success.

LexBlog Q & A: Todd Bishop of the Seattle Post Intelligencer

Today’s LexBlog Q & A (formerly Five Questions) features Todd Bishop, a local reporter at the Seattle Post Intelligencer who operates his own successful technology blog focusing on Microsoft, aptly called Todd Bishop’s Microsoft Blog. In an interview conducted via e-mail, Todd - who I got to know during my time as an intern at the P.I. earlier this year - explains the ever-changing role blogging has played in his life as a journalist.
1. Rob La Gatta: How did the development of your Microsoft blog come about in the first place, and when did this occur? Has it always been so focused, or did you begin with a broader topic (i.e. technology)?

Todd Bishop: I started my blog in September 2003. My primary assignment at the paper is to cover Microsoft, because of its big presence in the Seattle region. So Microsoft has always been the main subject of the blog, although I also end up writing about Google, Apple, IBM, Yahoo, Cisco, Sony, Nintendo and many other tech companies in the process.

A couple months before I started my blog, I had written a story about all the Microsoft employees who were just starting to blog. Blogging was still a novelty at that point for many people, and the story explored all the issues raised by corporate employee blogging. Working on the story also got me interested in the whole concept of blogging, and my editor at the time encouraged me to consider blogging as part of my beat.

Over time, the blog has become the main focus of my work. I still write for the newspaper almost every day, but more often than not, my newspaper stories flow from the reporting and writing that I do first for my blog. The blog is also a big focus for readers. It's not uncommon for people on the beat to recognize me from the blog, not from my byline in the newspaper. Old-school journalists would debate whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, but it's the reality for me at this point.

2. Rob La Gatta: Do you have a specific routine for blogging? Where do you write best – at home? In the office? Somewhere else?

Todd Bishop:
I have to be pretty mobile as part of my job, traveling to cover tech events and spending time on the Microsoft campus and at other companies. So I carry a laptop, and I've gotten good at blocking out the surroundings when I need to write, so it really doesn't matter where I am.

The "always-on" nature of blogging does require my hours to be a little more flexible. For example, sometimes I'll wake up earlier in the morning and work on some posts from home, and then take a break and go in to the office a little later.

3. Rob La Gatta: You are in a very unique situation, operating a blog about the biggest software company in the world from the city where they’re based. What would you say has been the biggest perk of maintaining and developing your blog?

Todd Bishop: I don't know if perk is the word I'd use, but blogging helps a beat reporter like me in few ways.

First, it helps my reporting by keeping me highly tuned in to what's happening, because I'm always digging for good blog material. It's not that I wouldn't be tuned in otherwise, but having a blog requires a reporter to pay attention on a much more granular level.

For example, sometimes I'll see an SEC document or court filing that might not seem to rise to the level of a full-blown newspaper story at first. But I'll start asking questions about it anyway, thinking that it might make a good blog post, and based on the answers that I get, it turns out that it's actually a really interesting story – something significant that also deserves to be in the newspaper. In those cases, I'll do the post and then write something on the same general topic for the paper.

The blog has also helped me become more widely known on the beat, which is a good thing.

There are downsides. For example, the time I spend on the blog each day means that I don't have much time to spend on long-term stories for the newspaper, the kinds of projects that other reporters work on in their spare time. So it's a trade-off.

4. Rob La Gatta: It appears that more and more reporters around the country are beginning to enter the blogosphere, gradually starting to write for their company blogs while continuing to do "traditional" stories for the print publication. If you could offer one bit of writing advice to a journalist moving from the print medium to a blog, what would it be?

Todd Bishop:
The biggest problem is time management. In reality, blogging and writing for the newspaper are two full-time jobs, but in most cases reporters are asked to do both.

My biggest piece of advice is to make your reporting count twice – once for the blog and once for the newspaper. To be clear, I'm not saying that reporters should just put the exact same content on the blog and in the newspaper. But one trick is to treat the blog as a place for your raw material – the basic information that you gather in the course of working your beat and reporting. And then that raw material is what you refine into your stories for the traditional print publication.

For example, when news breaks, I like to let the story unfold on my blog. I post quotes, interview excerpts, key facts and links to related material as the day progresses. So readers can follow along. Then, when it comes time to write my story for the newspaper, later in the day, it's all there for me to work with. I've been simultaneously blogging and preparing myself to write the newspaper story.

A good example of this is the posts I did following the rejection of Microsoft's antitrust appeal in Europe:
5. Rob La Gatta: Your blog entries often feature quotes from people affiliated with the companies you write about. On the whole, are these folks as willing to take the time to speak with you knowing that you’re quoting them in a blog entry rather than a newspaper article?

Todd Bishop: This has evolved over time. When I first started the blog, people weren't always willing to spend the time with me if it was "just" for a blog post. Frankly, back then, I didn't feel comfortable taking a lot of someone's time if it was just for a blog post.

But I've been doing this for more than four years now, and the audience for my blog has grown to the point where sometimes people will express disappointment if I only put something in the newspaper, and not on the blog – which is actually pretty rare, anyway. So it has totally changed, in a good way.
Many thanks to Todd for his thoughtful answers. Readers, keep checking back next week, when the LexBlog Q & A returns with some more exciting guests.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/19/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsIt's Friday today, the end of a week plagued by rain and wind here in Seattle. The updates to the LexBlogosphere are few and far between as we ring in the weekend.

Blog updates for October 19, 2007 include the following posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Law firm marketing webinar : Blogs and user-generated to attract clients

Next Wednesday, October 24, I'll be appearing on a webinar panel with Carolyn Elefant and Mark Britton. It's being hosted by ALM's National Law Journal. Join us without leaving your chair in front of your computer.

The details:

  • Getting found on the Web: How lawyers can leverage user-generated content and other new Internet tools to attract clients.
  • Wednesday, October 24.
  • 12 - 2pm Eastern Time.
  • Click here for registration, use promo code 2213032 when ordering to receive discount.

Carolyn who publishes her own blog, My Shingle and is co-publisher of Legal Blog Watch at ALM, regularly writes and speaks on law firm marketing and management for solos and small law firms. Her passion is an inspiration for all of us.

Mark is co-founder of Avvo, a new online lawyer directory that rates and profiles every attorney, so as to help people choose the right lawyer. Though Avvo's drawn resistance by some lawyers, I see a place for consumer driven lawyer ratings. I've also found Mark, a former practicing lawyer and Expedia exec, most sincere in his drive to bring a valuable resource to the public.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/18/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsToday's LexBlogosphere update features posts from Arnie and Lori Herz, a husband/wife team who each have their own blog with LexBlog.

The posts for October 18, 2007 include the follow:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

LexBlog's been banned

Ken Chen, CEO of OneCle says it's arbitrary and capricious, the banning of this blog, that is, by SmartFilter, content censorship software used by corporations.

Apparently the filters ban certain dating and social networking sites while allowing others to fly through. But with legal sites, Ken says things really get nuts.

Here's where the stupidity of the SmartFilter technology really shines through. They've banned Kevin O'Keefe's Real Lawyers Have Blogs as a personal page, but, Kevin, M.D. - Medical Weblog is o.k. Doctor Kevin = Good. Lawyer Kevin = Bad. However, they aren't giving all doctor blogs a free pass. Family Medicine Notes is a banned personal page.

Kevin (the lawyer) can take some consolation since he is among distinguished company. The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog, Akin Gump's SCOTUS blog, the Becker-Posner Blog, The Volokh Conspiracy and Professor Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog are all banned. However, they haven't touched the Lessig Blog or the Law Professor Blogs.

Though Ken found such filtering software in place in a hospital, it doesn't look like Chinese censorship is preventing access to a lot of folks who seem to be following what I do and say lately. Good morning guys.

How Google blogs may be a model for conservative law firm blogging

Despite Google's free wheeling perception, the company is pretty conservative when it comes to management of Google's 46 'official blogs.' One aspect of their blog protocol could even be used by law firms looking to 'oversee' their blogging lawyers.

Every product team at Google has a blog but their focus is strictly PR, not to give rise to a conversation on the blogs, none of which allow comments.

And as Karen Wickre, 'mother of Google's blogs', on her work as editor & 'gatekeeper' of the official Google blogs told Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land in an interview, all blog posts are reviewed before published live to the net.

While it's important to have a review, I never want to overwrite what a Googler is saying about their topic or product. All posts are reviewed by a few relevant people on the immediate team, plus a PR person for approval. As a rule, this isn't labor-intensive or overbearing. We try to encourage original perspectives and stories insofar as company blogs can feature those. We share drafts in Google Docs and do edits there. Again, I try hard not to overwrite or have the team wordsmith to death. That's not going to get us interesting reads.

Google's blogging does work. Even though comments may not be allowed on the blogs themselves, blog posts from Google often generate vibrant discussion on the blogosphere. Who wouldn't want to know what to know what Google is up to? And for many of us, who wouldn't to spread the fact on their own blog that they follow what Google is doing?

Law firms may also want to follow Google's lead on the use of blogs in place of press releases. As Karen told Danny, 'Much more often than a press release ... we'll issue a blog post.' Because of the tens of thousands of bloggers and reporters who subscribe to Google's blogs, a blog post is more widely disseminated than a press release.

Source on post: Google Blogoscoped

Law blogs be hot

May have noticed my blogging has been a little light this week. The reason is simple. The demand for law blogs is increasing.

Not sure if it's a blip on the radar, but the number of law firms who have contacted LexBlog the last week making inquiry of our services is up. The number of law firms ready to get started blogging with us has also taken a jump.

My gut tells me it's a few things. One, law firms have realized blogs are not a fad, they are here to stay. Two, law firms are seeing the results other lawyers are getting in enhancing their reputations and growing their business through blogs. And three, LexBlog's turnkey blog solution providing an effective, easy to use, safe, and empowering atmosphere of software and support makes for a soft landing into the world of law blogging.

Not sure you remember it Denise (Howell), but when giving me a lift back to the Oakland Airport last year you asked what LexBlog was going to do when all heck broke loose on the law firm blogging front. Can't tell for certain Denise, but it may be that all heck is breaking loose.

Most exciting for me is the team we've developed at LexBlog. We're ready for the demand. In fact, we just added a senior level employ to serve as VP of Client Development - more to come on that tomorrow.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/17/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsLots of interesting posts today, including an update from LexBlog's latest launch: the National Insurance Law Forum blog.

The news for October 17, 2007 include these updates:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Free Flow of Information Act approved by House of Representatives in 398-21 vote

Back in May, Kevin wrote about the Free Flow of Information Act and the legal shield it would provide for journalists and bloggers. After a House vote of 398-21 in favor of the bill yesterday, Nate Anderson at Ars Technica reveals, that legal shield is one step closer to becoming a reality.

The Free Flow of Information Act, which Anderson says has received support from both sides of the aisle, would ultimately work to keep the government in check.
The bill would offer protection of sources and documents to journalists (including professional bloggers) caught up in federal investigations, and could put an end to images of reporters led from court in handcuffs after refusing to testify.
And while it may be receiving bipartisan support at the legislative level, the executive branch is less receptive, according to Editor & Publisher.
The White House issued a statement Tuesday afternoon saying President Bush's advisers would recommend he veto the legislation unless it's changed, claiming the bill is too broad and could harm national security.

"It is likely that the legislation will encourage more leaks of classified information by giving leakers such a formidable shield behind which they can hide," the statement read.
While the law only covers professional journalists (those who report news for "financial gain or livelihood"), there are undoubtedly bloggers out there who do just that - and who should legitimately not have to fear prosecution or jail. Whether the bill becomes law or not, it is apparent by the vote that politicians from both sides of the political spectrum understand the value of journalistic checks and balances.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/16/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsIt's October 16 today, and it seems like half of Seattle is sick with an easily-spread bug. Don't forget to wash your hands.

The updates for October 16, 2007 include:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

LexBlog Q & A: Greg Linden of Findory

Today we return with another LexBlog Q & A (formerly Five Questions), this time featuring web personalization guru Greg Linden. Greg developed the engine that drives Amazon.com's recommendation system and, more recently (in 2004) founded Findory.com. After Kevin recently wrote about Findory's impending closure, I got in touch with Greg for a brief e-mail interview regarding his experience with web personalization.
1. Rob La Gatta: By reading your blog, it is clear that web personalization is your passion. What was it that drew you to the idea of personalization in the first place, and when did this happen?

Greg Linden: What I love about personalization is that it can help you find things you would not have found on your own. If you do not know what you want, if you do not know something might exist, you cannot easily search for it.

Back in the early days of Amazon, they only sold books. Even then, there were millions of books in its catalog and new ones coming out every day, so many that it was impossible to know about all of them or even most of them. The appeal of personalization for me back then was that it would help people find books – find knowledge – that they otherwise may have never seen.

2. Rob La Gatta: In your post on the Findory site detailing its closure, you end by saying that you "continue to believe that the future will be personalized." Where do you see personalized web content five years from now?

Greg Linden: We are all subject to a deluge of information in our daily lives. We are saturated in it and overwhelmed by it. We need filters that focus our attention. We need help to process the information flooding [toward] us.

In a world of personalized information, search engines would learn from your behavior, determine what you think is relevant and interesting, and reorder search results to focus in on what you need. Communication including e-mails, instant messages and text messages would be prioritized by importance of the contact and the cost of an interruption. News would be customized to your needs and interests, a stream of knowledge about current events built just for you. Advertising would be helpful, useful and relevant, only showing products and services you want to know about.

I think personalized information is inevitable. The need is great. The benefits are obvious. The rewards are large. It is inescapable: the future will be personalized.

3. Rob La Gatta: Being based out of a technology hub like Seattle, have you found that people here are more accepting (and trusting) of web personalization – everything from Netflix recommendations to the engine that drove Findory – than in other parts of the country/world where the Internet may not play as important a role in day-to-day life?

Greg Linden: No, I do not think Seattle is different in that respect. Personalization needs to be useful to be accepted. If it is useful, people want it and trust it. If it is not useful, people find it annoying and intrusive. The key is to focus on helping people find what they need. When personalization does that, people like it.

4. Rob La Gatta: When it comes to advertising, personalization is valuable because nobody wants to see ads for things that don't interest them. Do you believe traditional mediums (such as newspapers and magazines) will be able to adapt to this? Or will everything – content and ads alike – move to online, where it is tailored exclusively to the interests of the consumer?

Greg Linden: I do not think everything will move online, no, but online is the primary area of growth for newspapers and magazines.

Online offers an interesting opportunity for newspapers. No longer is it necessary to print a single front page that everyone sees. Online, the constraints of the printing process are gone. Everyone can see different content.

This opens [opportunities] that only have begun to be explored where newspapers can show different content and different ads to each reader based on the needs and interests of that person. Online, we can build a newspaper just for you.

5. Rob La Gatta: In your initial announcement detailing Findory's demise ["Findory rides into the sunset," 1/14/07] you said that you plan to spend your free time not with another venture, but with family and friends. Are you still on that track, or can we expect to see something new from you in the coming months?

Greg Linden: I have no firm plans yet. I am exploring several opportunities, but cannot say anything specific.
Greg has volunteered to answer any other questions, but rather than ask those myself, I'd like to see what readers are wondering. Do you have a question for Greg Linden? Post them in the comments. I'll select three or four of the best and send them to Greg, so we can post a follow-up.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/15/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsWelcome back to the work week...and, if you're in Seattle, to the winter weather. Looking at the forecast here, we've got three straight days of the rain that makes our city famous.

The news from October 15, 2007 includes these updates:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Google is only lawyer directory to bother with

There's only one lawyer directory that matters, and that's Google, says legal marketing expert, Larry Bodine.

Lawyers are repeatedly seduced and marketers are constantly aggravated to take space in law firm directories.' Which one to choose? How much to pay? Should you pay?' I can make the decision easy for you. There is only one directory you need to worry about: Google.
.....
Clients use Google to look up phone numbers and addresses, so law firms can cancel their yellow pages ads. When clients want to check out your firm, they are not going to call up to get your printed brochure, they will look you up online.

I have heard Larry speak and he's speaking of the importance of Google for all sized law firms, from solos to the very largest.

Other search engines aren't all that important for lawyers either. New research from Compete.com, indicates Google's share of Web searches in September 2007 was 67%, up from 54% in 2006. Yahoo is at 19%, down from 29% in 2006, with MSN at 9%.

Google lawyer directory

I agree with Larry. Though it may still be worth my while, I never look at Yahoo or MSN when examining the search engine performance of my sites or LexBlog client blog sites.

As for directories such as FindLaw, Martindale-Hubbell, Super Lawyers, Avvo, and the like, the most important function they can play is getting the biographical information of your firm and its lawyers indexed at Google. The days of a lawyer directory portal site where Internet users go to look up lawyers are coming to an end.

LinkedIn Answers generate RSS feed picked up at Google Blog Search

LinkedIn lawyersPicked up in my RSS feed on 'law firm websites' from Google Blog Search a LinkedIn Answer responding to an ethics question relating to a law firm website.

The best answer was submitted by a law clerk at a law firm, but could have equally been answered by a lawyer whose expertise is legal ethics. If such an expert was registered at LinkedIn and using it effectively she or he would have received the question and had an opportunity to answer. The answer would be have been catalogued by subject and available to search for all LinkedIn users. Finally the answer would be displayed with the lawyer's LinkedIn profile.

And most importantly, unlike the all the lame resource sites out there without RSS, a lawyer's answer would get picked up by anyone with an interest in the subject, whether the recipient was using LinkedIn or not. How? Power users of content, other bloggers and reporters, set up RSS feeds of relevant searches at Google Blog Search or Technorati. Without using LinkedIn, they get your answer.

Just another reason for you as a lawyer to use LinkedIn and LinkedIn Answers as a means of further enhancing your reputation as an authority in your niche and networking with your target audience.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/14/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsWe've got some never-before-featured blogs making their way into the update today.

Some of the issues being discussed on October 14, 2007 include:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Blogs are a discussion newspapers, not a demographic capturing tool

Saw in my feeds this morning a post from the Bay Area Business Blog at the San Francisco Chronicle.

Was going to mention to Bay Area commercial lawyers as a way to further enhance their reputations. You know, comment on relevant posts, get to know the reporter, get to know other commenters. Great way to get known for what you do by influencers in the Bay Area.

But the whole set up for this blog is lame. One, I didn't see any RSS feeds. How could one follow posts. Second was pop up ads. Third, and most offensive was that before you could comment you needed to register. Registration required the typical newspaper demographic junk like date of birth, where you live, and your gender.

Newspapers, who are experiencing declining revenues, have a golden opportunity to become more relevant with readership. It's through interacting with bloggers. Bloggers referencing your online newspaper content on their posts and commenting at your blog are going to drive traffic to you.

To take advantage of this opportunity, newspapers cannot set up all walls that say 'we do not want you bloggers, go away.' But that's exactly what newspapers are saying when they set up special 'blog rules of their own,' by having no RSS feeds, pop up ads, and requiring demographic info to comment.

2007 Weblog Awards accepting nominatations for best law blog

The 2007 Weblog Awards are taking nominations in various categories, including the law, through Monday. You can nominate what you believe is the best law blog in the comments section of this post.

29 comments with nominations so far. Some real reaches in what folks consider the best.

Martindale-Hubbell continues slide: Starts charging lawyers for 'Coveted Rating' service

In the noble tradition of law firm 'pay for play' rating services, Martindale-Hubbell will only continue to display a lawyer's rating in print or online if a lawyer pays 50 bucks per year.

Here's the unsolicited email one lawyer recently got from Martindale.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings - 2nd Notice

We recently notified you of an annual $50 administration fee associated with the maintenance and upkeep of your Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings listing displayed throughout the Martindale-Hubbell Legal Network.

While we assume this nominal fee remains unpaid through an oversight, you should know that if it not paid by 11/01/07, your rating will no longer be displayed in our online and print resources. This would not eliminate your coveted rating; however it would exclude your rating from being seen by over 1 million that reference Martindale-Hubbell when evaluating and selecting a legal resource...

Slick deal. What used to be free now costs $50. If Martindale rates 200,000 lawyers, that's potential $10 million in incremental revenue.

Martindale calls it a processing fee. We've rated you, but that rating cannot be displayed on the Web or in print until we get your $50. Looks like legal extortion to me. We're the bible of lawyer ratings, we'll rate you, but no one sees the rating till you fork over a 50 spot.

If Edmunds started charging car manufacturers for each car, new and used, they rated, it would an obvious a conflict of interest. How could you charge someone a fee when you claiming to do an impartial rating? You can't.

You think Martindale will keep rating the lawyers who don't pay them $50? As you know there's 'administration [costs] associated with the maintenance and upkeep of your Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings.'

Related posts

New York Times adds reader comments to front page

New York Times Lawyer Comments
Silicon Alley Insider discovered yesterday that The New Times was testing the display of reader comments at the bottom of individual news stories on their online edition. Based on what I've heard, expect comments to be a regular feature.

New York Times Lawyer Comments

Like Silicon Alley, I've always been impressed with the Times innovative use of its website. I'm always showing folks attending my presentations all the RSS feeds the Times has for its separate sections and columns. Reader participation is just another step in making the paper more relevant in the lives of its readers.

Lawyers, this is a coup for you. Imagine the Times and newspapers across the country allowing comments to news stories involving legal issues. Your regular commenting is as as good as being a regular on the Larry Kind Show when he's covering legal stories - except at a local level, where people know you and you get your work.

Commenting on legal news, as you do on your blog already, is not only a valuable contribution to citizens' understanding of the law, but also a golden way of further enhancing your reputation as a reliable and trusted authority in your area of expertise.

Source on post: Josh Catone at Read/WriteWeb


Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/13/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsBrief entry from the LexBlogosphere today, with less than 15 updates by noon. Not surprising for a Saturday, but I picked one post that was technically posted late last night - the one from Jamie Spencer - because I thought it was so well written, and touches on an important issue that has been making its way around the blogosphere.

The crop of posts for October 13, 2007 includes:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Twitter for me and other lawyers?

Twitter for lawyersTwitter is a free social networking and micro-blogging service that allows users to send "updates" (text-based posts, up to 140 characters long) to the Twitter website. Updates are displayed on the user's profile page and instantly delivered to other users who have signed up to receive them.

I viewed it as a 'my cat just rolled over, isn't that cool' thing that would never be used by lawyers, at least in any effective way. I registered at Twitter, received messages saying someone was 'following me at Twitter,' but never did anything with Twitter - especially to even think of following someone else. People who know me know the last thing I need is another thing that will easily distract me. Twitter looked like attention deficit disorder on steroids.

But Internet legal marketing expert, Steve Matthews, mentioned Twitter being of value in his presentation at the Pacific Legal Technology Conference this week. Then Shel Israel, another person I have a lot of respect for, acknowledged this morning that after a month he loves Twitter.

I am probably using it more than Facebook these days. While Facebook has been a remarkably enjoyable tool for business, Twitter's concrete benefits remain less clear to me.
.....

But Twitter seems to be the most intimate of social media--and the most social. I personally know most of the people I follow, and I know a good deal about the people I have not yet met face-to-face. I get to know about their lives. I watch the dynamics of my social network as it bops around the tangible world. It helps us stay current and close.

I'm a regular user of web tools that I originally thought worthless (IM is just one). I may give Twitter a try If nothing more than to respond to client questions about Twitter. But if Shel is right that I can follow people in my network and get to know them better through Twitter and possibly share ideas we're working on, there could be real value.

Bay Area Blawgers 2.0 on November 5

The High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara Law School and Six Apart are putting on Bay Area Blawgers 2.0, the second gathering of legal bloggers in the Bay Area.

It'll be from 6 to 8 at the San Francisco office of Fenwick & West. Eric Goldman says there will be an hour of a structured discussion (see possible discussion topics), offering 1 hour of general CLE credit. The rest of the time will be spent 'schmoozing/chit-chatting.'

The last Bay Area legal blogger meetup was well attended and by the list of RSVP's for this one, it looks like it'll be even bigger. I'm planning on getting down there from Seattle.

Ironic that Fenwick is hosting this event. Told me a ways back that they didn't see blogs in their plans as a method for further enhancing the reputation of any of their lawyers or practice groups.

Update: Eric tells me Aaron Perzanowski at Fenwick is blogging. Curious that he would not disclose hsi association with Fenwick on his copyright law blog, Substantial Similiarity.

Avvo looking for Seattle consumers and lawyers to help improve their site

Avvo lawyer ratingsThe consumer lawyer directory and lawyer rating website, Avvo, is looking for a few folks to come to their office in Pioneer Square (Seattle) to test new product features. They've got you covered with a Starbucks card and free parking.

  • Consumers, one hour session, Friday, 10/19. Only requirement? You've searched online for a lawyer, anytime, on any site.
  • Lawyers, one hour session, Wednesday, 10/17 or Thursday, 10/18

Hey Mark and Conrad, if you're looking to help improve your blog and it's reach, I have an idea for you. ;)

Blogs trusted more than search, banner, and other web advertsing

Consumer-generated content is by far a more trusted form of advertising worldwide than search engine ads, banner ads, or text ads, according to Nielsen, and is trusted almost as much as physical word-of-mouth. That from Jason Miller at WebProNews.

66 percent of North Americans trust consumer-generated media, such as blogs. Blogs follow only 'other consumer recommendations,' which earned 78 percent of respondents' trust.

Blogs far out paced other web advertising such as email subscriptions (49%), search ads (34%), online banners (26%), and mobile text ads (18%).

How to stop a disgruntled ex-employee blogger

Canadian Vawn Himmelsbach at IT Business shares some helpful info on how to stop a disgruntled ex-employee blogger.

Companies cannot simply dismiss the issue of an ex-employee saying disparaging things on the blogosphere. Blogs are very powerful in spreading stories, especially the juicy and interesting ones ex-employees are apt to tell. Left un-countered, word can spread like wild fire via through the blogosphere and into resulting stories in the main stream media.

Here's a number of tips from Vawn on how to control the damage.

  • Companies should be monitoring on a daily basis what's being said about them on the Web through keywords, such as company name, key products and even competitors (easily down via RSS) May even want to monitor employee names.
  • Try to deal with the person human to human - try to get dialogue going.
  • An ex-peer of the disgruntled blogger may be best for dialogue, ie, developer to developer, as opposed to an HR person.
  • Keep the lawyer profile low or you risk slowing down the process of real dialogue.
  • You don't always have to address the blogger. There be some cases where ignoring them may be best.
  • Look at any contract the employee signed limiting what they may discuss once they leave the company.
  • Legal action should be a last resort.
  • Scare tactics such as an official letter that tells them to 'cease and desist' can easily backfire with the letter being published to the blogosphere, and only exacerbating the problem.

One thing Vawn doesn't mention is the necessity of an effective Internet presence. An effective corporate Internet presence is not a Web site or press releases issued across the net. It means having a trusted and reliable voice or, better yet, multiple voices on the blogosphere. An effective Internet presence requires corporate employees to be blogging.

Disgruntled employee stories spread on the blogosphere because they are 'interesting and juicy.' When there is no one from the company with a blog that outsiders regularly follow to explain what may really be going on, the employer's side of the story does not get spread by other bloggers. The story in favor of the disgruntled employee is all that's heard.

A blog, as a means of handling disgruntled employees on the net, may be a bit frightening for corporate heads and PR/communications professionals. But times are changing. Practicality requires doing things differently than they've been done in the past.

LexBlog Video Q & A: Bill Marler of Marler Clark

Today's update to the LexBlog Q & A, formerly known as Five Questions, is a dispatch from our usual approach. Though the subject is a LexBlog client (Bill Marler, the Seattle-based food safety lawyer who operates a group of blogs that includes his own Marler Blog), this time we've used YouTube. Click below to learn how Bill has grown to be one of the most effective law bloggers in the country.

My questions may be a bit hard to hear (I'll pack another mic next time), so here's what I asked.
  • Will you describe your first experience writing for a blog?
  • How do you think your writing voice has changed from when you started to where you are now?
  • Do you have a specific routine for blogging? Where do you write best - is it at home? In the office?
  • If you were to offer one bit of advice to a lawyer who was just starting their first blog, what would it be?

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/12/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsEnding the week on a high note: when I opened my newsfeed reader at 11:30 this morning and went to the folder where I store LexBlog client feeds, there were more than 100 updates.

The blog updates for October 12, 2007 include these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/11/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsLots of updates to the LexBlogosphere today, bringing an otherwise dead week to life.

Among the entries for October 11, 2007 were these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/10/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsI'm headed over to the offices of Marler Clark this afternoon to interview Bill Marler for our first video installment of the LexBlog Q & A. Watch for that in the next few days, and in the meantime check out today's Q & A with Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft.

The blog updates for October 10, 2007 include these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

LexBlog Q & A: Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft

This update to the LexBlog Q & A (formerly titled Five Questions) marks a change in direction: today, our interviews begin to move beyond the LexBlogosphere. While our clients will still be featured, we've also got some great interviews lined up with important bloggers from around the country. Kicking off the proceedings is Jeralyn Merritt.

Jeralyn, a Denver-based criminal defense lawyer, is well known in the blogosphere for her blog TalkLeft, which dubs itself as "the online magazine with liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news." She is also frequently featured as a legal commentator on nationally syndicated television news programs.

1. Rob La Gatta: As you see it, do lawyers today understand that they have an obligation to step into the nationwide dialogue as defenders of our civil liberties (and of democracy on a whole)? As a follow-up, how (if at all) can blogs help them to fulfill that obligation?

Jeralyn Merritt: I don't think law bloggers are obligated to write about any particular subject. Nor do I think being a lawyer obligates one to discuss politics.

The point of blogging is to write about what interests you. A lawyer might prefer to blog about wine or sports. If the blog is intended to complement one's law practice, writing news updates with commentary on topics related to his or her field of practice may be the sole topic. I'd be hard-pressed to say a commercial law or wills and estates law blogger needs to write about civil liberties or democracy.

As a criminal defense lawyer, I'm interested in civil liberties and government. So I write about these topics from my point of view. But lawyers, just like everyone else, have the right to be apolitical or non-political and to keep their political views to themselves.

2. Rob La Gatta: You seem quite tech-savvy compared to most lawyers. What other unique skills have you picked up throughout your legal career that you think have made you an effective lawyer?

Jeralyn Merritt: I'm more tech savvy because I created websites before starting to blog. To do that, I spent a week holed up in a basement with a techie-type lawyer who taught me HTML coding so I could build and maintain my own sites. Happily, for blogging, those skills aren't necessary and I don't think they contributed anything to my lawyering.

Strong typing skills and being computer software literate did make me early prey for Lexis and Westlaw, which sharpened my legal research abilities and made me more confident in arguing my positions in court.

As to non-tech skills, I think being a TV legal analyst and continuing legal education speaker honed my public speaking ability and made my court presentations shorter, more focused and smoother. And being an Internet journalist and op-ed writer has improved the grammar and style of my motion and brief-writing.

3. Rob La Gatta: So far, TalkLeft – liberal leaning in nature – has lived its entire life under the presidency of Republican George W. Bush. What do you plan to do if, come January 2009, a Democratic president is sworn into office? Do you expect that under such circumstances, the content, mission or direction of the blog would change?

Jeralyn Merritt: TalkLeft won't change for quite some time. No Democrat running for office fully supports my position on criminal justice issues. Since the Democrats gained control of Congress in 2006, I've found plenty to criticize, particularly in their voting to amend the FISA wiretap law and not voting to cut off funding for the Iraq War.

The mission and direction of the blog is not so much to criticize, but rather to educate the public and encourage them to lobby our elected officials for change. For TalkLeft, that will be as necessary with a Democrat in office as it was with a Republican.

When we get a President who vows to impose a moratorium on executions, close Guantanamo, and try accused terrorists under the Code of Military Justice or in federal courts, who pushes Congress to abolish mandatory minimum sentences, put a lockbox on social security benefits and provide mandatory health care, including affordable and compassionate nursing home care for the elderly, and who has ended the war in Iraq and promised not to get us into other wars preemptively or under false pretenses, then TalkLeft's mission will be accomplished and I'll start a travel or food blog.

4. Rob La Gatta: Did you see increased readership in the months leading up to the 2004 presidential election? Have you been noticing any increase in traffic as we move closer to the 2008 election?

Jeralyn Merritt: Traffic was way up in the months before the 2004 election. It's down from that level now, but as the primaries approach, I expect it to rebound.

5. Rob La Gatta: You recently featured a guest post from former ambassador Joseph Wilson, who to my knowledge is the biggest name we’ve seen guest blogging at TalkLeft so far. Can we expect to see more posts from high profile political figures in coming months?

Jeralyn Merritt: I hope so. I don't have the time to solicit them, but if they reach out to me and want to write about an issue germane to TalkLeft, they are welcome to be a front page guest poster. I did make an overture to former President Clinton when he brought a group of bloggers to New York in 2006 to learn more about blogging, but he hasn't taken me up on it – yet.

I think you can expect more interviews with prominent political figures on TalkLeft as the 2008 election – and particularly the Democratic Convention, which will be held in Denver – approaches.
Know an influential blogger you'd like to see interviewed? Send me an e-mail with their name and why you think they'd be good to hear from, and we'll try to set something up.

How to find a niche for your law blog

Blogging on a general topic such as IP law law is not nearly as effective as blogging on a niche such as Maryland IP Law or Fair Use Law.

The reason is that's it's much harder to become a recognized and trusted authority across a broad topic than it is a niche. Blog a niche and you're going to have other bloggers and the media citing you as an authority on that niche. Blog on a general topic or worse yet, a number of topics and you'll have those bloggers and reporters looking for a niche blogger to cite or quote. Prospective clients are the same. They are looking for an expert.

Lawyers often call with a clearly defined niche for their law blog. Others I need to coach through the process of identifying their niche. Guiding rules for me are 'What type of work do you want to do?' and 'What type of clients do you want to do it for?' Now make it happen.

But I really like what Tamara Berry at Freelance Parent had to say on determining your niche. In her case, it was free lance writing, but it applies equally to blogs.

  • Look at your resume. No matter what your professional past, chances are you held some sort of job that required specific skill sets. What did you get your undergrad degree in? Even if you never directly used the degree, having it might make you a good candidate on a niche. Spoke last week with a lawyer with a biology degree from a major university. Dovetailing from that helped us arrive at a niche for his law blog. No matter what makes up your resume, it is unique to you. These experiences can go a long way in getting you on the path to a profitable niche.
  • Find what inspires you. Blogging on the area of law you most enjoy doing may be the most important factor in determing your niche. Tamara cites the saying, 'if you find a job you love, you'll never have to work a day in your life.' Blog on an area you enjoy and blogging will never seem like chore. Readers will pick up on your passion. You'll get cited and quoted. Prospective clients will call you.
  • Consider your personal library. Tamara, like me, has more books than she has shelf space. Look at your books and see if they do follow a common theme. Maybe there are certain CLE programs you've enjoyed - see what CLE materials you have lying around.
  • Follow the dollar signs. As Tamara says, bringing in a little money is the main reason we are all in this game. Some areas of the law pay, others do not. Factor this in.

In case you're wondering, Tamara mentioned law firm & blog in her post. It's amazing the good stuff you pick up skimming through your feed titles. ;)

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/9/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsLots of good news from the LexBlogosphere today...and, for the first time in weeks, no content submissions. If you've forgotten how, just e-mail me with a post you think is worth highlighting.

The news for October 9, 2007 includes these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Vancouver, BC tomorrow : Stop by

I'm in Vancouver tomorrow for presentations at the Pacific Legal Technology Conference put on by the The Law Society of British Columbia and a number of other associations.

I'm on one panel with Steve Matthews, and Doug Jasinski in which we'll review 'What's 'HOT' in legal marketing today?' Covers the latest trends in legal marketing through websites, blogs, podcasts, SEO, Google Adwords, and the like.

Steve Matthews and I will be presenting later regarding how different technologies that have not been traditionally used in the practice of law can be put to use to make your practice a more effective one, both personally and professionally.

The Conference is at the Westin Bayshore Resort & Marina. If you have some time, consider attending. If you'd like to get to together to discuss blogs, or anything else, just drop me an email or give me a call on my cell, 206 321 3627. I'll be around till later tomorrow evening.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/8/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsTo everyone not working a government job, welcome back to the work week.

The LexBlogosphere is back in full swing, and the updates for October 8, 2007 include:
 Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Lawyers contributing to significant growth in search engine marketing revenue

Search engine marketing via the purchase of sponsored links is continuing its staggering growth. And lawyers are contributing their fair share.

Loren Baker
at Search Engine Journal points out, per the IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report, that (41%) of the $10 billion spent in Internet advertising for the first half of 2007 was spent on search.


  First Half 2006 First Half 2007
Search 40% ($3,164) 41% ($4,097)
Classifieds 20% ($1,582) 17% ($1,699)
Referrals/Lead Generation 7% ($592) 8% ($799)
E-mail 2% ($158) 2 % ($200)n
Display Related: 31% ($2,413) 32% ($3,198)
 - Rich Media (includes video) 6% ($475) 8% ($799)
- Ad Banners/Display Ads 21% ($1,622) 21% ($2,099)
- Sponsorships 4% ($316) 3% ($300)
- Slotting Fees <1% (<$1) <1% (<$1)

As Loren notes, spending is much higher during the second quarter of 2007 than it was a year before:
Internet advertising revenue totaled nearly $5.1 billion for the second quarter of 2007, exceeding the $5 billion mark for the first time in a quarter, a 25.4 percent increase over the same period in 2006.
These numbers aren't surprising. Take a look at this post on Adsense top paying keywords, keeping in mind the cost-per-click definitions from Google's Inside AdWords blog:
  • CPC is an abbreviation for cost-per-click, and refers to the cost that you will pay (per click) when a user clicks on your ad.
  • Maximum CPC is a maximum amount that is set by you, the advertiser, and defines the most you wish to pay for a click on a keyword. Keep in mind that you don't automatically pay this maximum amount because the AdWords Discounter will always reduce the amount you are charged to be just one cent more than the minimum necessary to keep your position on the page.
  • Average CPC (also seen as Avg. CPC in your account) is literally that: an average. Since each click you receive may have a different CPC depending on a variety of factors, we show you the Average CPC in your account to give you an effective overview. The Average CPC is determined by totalling the cost of all clicks and then dividing that total by the number of clicks.
At the most expensive end of the Adsense spectrum, Yahoo has an average CPC of $97.44 (no shock there). But as you move down the list, you notice that even simple services - hair removal, refinancing, and not surprisingly a range of legal needs - are costing advertisers averages above $12 a click.

Some notable average CPC's for legal services:
  • law lemon wisconsin ($66.15)
  • accident car florida lawyer ($28.03)
  • orlando criminal attorney ($24.15)
  • criminal defense federal lawyer ($23.09)
  • miami personal injury lawyer ($22.93)

And these are just averages. As the list points out, many of these advertisers are willing to pay between $30 and $50, sometimes well above $100, for consumer clicks.

List of federal government agency blogs

The Associated Press has pulled together this list of federal government agency blogs.

Haven't read any of them so I'll hold back on my government getting anything done cynicism.

No more excuses, Just blog

Daniel Jalkut, a Mac software developer and founder of Red Sweater Software, says no more excuses, business professionals need to blog. He may be talking to developers, but his logic applies equally to lawyers. Heck, Jalkut cites me as an example.

...[I]f you want to be a significant member of the Mac developer community, you need to have a blog. In fact, you need a blog even if you're not a Mac developer. It's good for your business, it's good for your social life, and it can even be good for your ego.

And if you've been slow to pick up the habit, you better get moving. People from all professions and social circles are learning how important blogging is to staying connected in our modern digital world. Kevin O'Keefe is a former trial lawyer who is now trying to impress upon other lawyers the importance of marketing yourself on the web, with his own blog: Real Lawyers Have Blogs.

That's right. Even the lawyers are blogging now. The 'no duh' wisdom of starting a blog is spreading like wildfire. You have to ask yourself now if you're involved with technology, do you want your lawyer to have a blog before you do?

In your case as a lawyer, do you want your clients to have a blog before you? Worse yet, do you want your competitor law firms to have a blog before you? I haven't talked to many folks who are looking for a lawyer lacking in innovation.

You'll need to read Jalkut's whole post on common excuses for not blogging that he shot down. Here's a few I liked.

  • Excuse: 'Nobody reads/will read my blog…' Well, duh. That's because you haven't written anything in 3 months, and the last time you did, it was about what you ate for breakfast. You can write more often and you can choose a topical area to focus on. What's amazing about the web is it truly is so huge and there are so many people hungry for content, that your blog will gain a readership as long as you keep working at it.
  • Excuse: 'I don't have anything to say…' If you can't think of anything interesting to say, you might have to face the sad possibility that you're not an interesting person. But that's almost certainly not true. You just need to figure out what you do that's interesting, and then share it.
  • Excuse: 'I don't have time to blog…' If you're spending time reading other peoples' blogs then you've obviously set aside some time in your busy schedule to engage with the world blogging community. The fact that you're spending all that time listening and none of it speaking is just a matter of allocation. Join the conversation. Lots of people don't realize how little time it can take to run a blog. With modern publishing systems, adding new content is literally as easy as typing it into a text field and clicking 'Send,' or 'Publish,' or 'Save.'

And when you're blogging, you needn't use Red Sweater's MarsEdit blog publisher. But if you're a Mac user, it's a God send.

Is automatic translation for law blogs useful?

Des Walsh, an Australian business coach and blogging evangelist, asks 'Is automatic translation for business blogs useful?' How about for law blogs?

Many lawyers are anxious to have their blogs translated into a second language, especially Spanish.

LexBlog has been open to doing a second language blog for clients, but the key is accuarate translation. Effective law blogs enhance a lawyer's reputation as a reliable and trusted authority. A push of the button translation that's not perfect (usually the case) does the opposite, it detracts from the lawyer's reputation as a trusted authority.

The answer is to do a second blog with the same posts as your first blog in a second language. The posts from the first blog would be translated by a person in the office who's bilingual. Extra work. Sure. But a niche blog focused on, perhaps the Hispanic community in your locale could be very effective.

Des does discuss possible blog software for automatic translation. However, he raises a number of problems, not the least of which is getting an accurate translation.

...[I]t is fanciful at best to expect a mechanical translator to convey the fullness of meaning (or even, perhaps, a high degree of accuracy) in translating such idiosyncratic linguistic expressions as blogs are - or can be - into multiple languages.

This practical impossibility of having high level quality assurance for these translations raises in turn the question of whether it is prudent or not to use one of these [blog software] plugins on a business blog.

It comes down to making a strategic judgement about whether the risk or even likelihood of being misunderstood, by virtue of an egregiously bad bit of translation by Google's machine, is outweighed by the potential benefit of providing some level of access to people who would otherwise find what is on your blog quite impenetrable.

For lawyers, I don't believe it's a risk worth taking.


Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/7/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsThough I'm a bit late with this update today, in some ways it has worked to my advantage by giving some blogs that aren't normally updated in the earlier morning a chance to be featured.

The news for October 7, 2007 includes these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Lawyer MySpace site?

MySpace for lawyers LawLinkSan Francisco PI lawyer Steven Choi's recently launched Lawlink.com is a self described social networking site such as MySpace and FaceBook but limited to attorneys only. Like other social Web sites, attorneys who belong to Lawlink have a profile, photos and other career-related information.

I've been seeing it pop up in various trade periodicals and main stream media, the latest being an article this week in the Memphis Daily News.

Choi says the major benefit is building relationships by which an attorney can get help for a particular case they're working on, can find out about job opportunities and refer clients to attorneys with specific expertise.

Every lawyer has a client base, you know. I've been practicing law for almost 24 years, so I've got a pretty large client base. But my field of specialty is pretty narrow. My clients are always asking me if I know a lawyer who can do this or do that.

Problem as I see it is until you have a huge number of lawyers participating, networking via the Internet in so many other ways other than LawLink is much more meaningful.

If I want to find an expert in counterfeit law, I'm unlikely to go to a MySpace for lawyers site with 10,000 members (Lawlink has 1,500 now). I am going to go to Google and see who's writing on counterfeit law issues and who's being cited on the subject. I am going to go to LinkedIn where lawyers are incented to network as they are seen by prospective clients in addition to other lawyers. Plus LinkedIn has millions of registered business users in a robust atmosphere that is constantly being updated with networking and community building features.

Plus you have firms that just hearing a MySpace for lawyers scares them away. Per the article, the interest in the site from the Memphis area seems to be nonexistent. A typical response could be that from Laura Hine, chief marketing officer at Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz PC, who took a minute to look LinkedIn over.

I haven't heard of it and I haven't heard of any of our attorneys signing up for the site. We join these types of things, usually as firms, not as individual attorneys. We focus on international networks, where our firm will be a member on a statewide basis. ... The way we're doing networks, we market the firm because we have so much expertise across the firm that we can provide more opportunities for service that way instead of just focusing on just one attorney.

I laud Choi for trying this. But I am afraid that the sexiness of a MySpace for lawyers is going to lead to more press than real value for lawyers.

What do you guys think?

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/6/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsWe're back, after a brief outage this morning (which was quickly taken care of by LexBlog's IT Director Jesse Newland). It's Saturday, and the crop of entries today is limited.

Here are some of the few updates to the LexBlogosphere for October 6, 2007:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Texas Bar Association recognizes power of YouTube

Texas Bar Association YouTubeThe State Bar of Texas has launched a contest 'Lone Star Stories: Texans on Justice,' inviting all Texans of all ages, lawyers and lay people alike, to submit three-minute-or-less original videos to YouTube that illustrate their vision of the promise of justice for all.

Per an article in Texas Lawyer, entrants under 18 can win a $2,500 scholarship, while those over 18 are competing for a $2,500 cash prize. The Bar will be informing teachers around the state about the contest to encourage more video entries from students.

I agree with State Bar President Gib Walton, who launched the Bar's YouTube contest at the suggestion of Crane MetaMarketing, who sees 'this as a new venue for the citizens of Texas to express their opinions on the justice system in Texas and to do it in a fun environment.'

YouTube, used as a community of user generated videos, is using YouTube the smart way. Contrast Texas' approach with the Pennsylvania Bar Association whose advertising company used YouTube to run a Bar television advertisement to emphasize the good that lawyers accomplish.

No one at YouTube gives a darn what a Bar Association has to say about the wonderful things the Bar's members do. (I am not discounting lawyers' contributions to society) YouTube viewers want to see what other people say and Bar Associations should promote themselves and the law through what non lawyers think about the law. As Walton says 'We know Texans have opinions, I'm looking forward to what Texans have to say.'

Update From Carolyn Elefant: I'm impressed by the Texas Bar's initiative -- and excited by the prospect of bar associations using video for another reason as well. Now that the bars realize that they can harness the power of YouTube, perhaps they can combat what they perceive as tasteless TV ads not through heavy-handed regulation but simply through a counter video campaign.

Legal News: LexBlogosphere - 10/5/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsWe're ending the week on a high note today, with a range of content submissions from bloggers across the legal spectrum.

Some of the posts and submissions from October 5, 2007 include:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Internet legal marketing firms getting portion of lawyer's fees is out of bounds

Found out recently that some companies selling Internet marketing services to lawyers require that the lawyers pay a portion of the fees earned to the Internet marketing company.

To me, that's overreaching, inappropriate, and depending on how its being done and the state involved, a violation of ethic's rules.

How do they get away with it? Some lawyers, especially in the personal injury arena, are addicted to SEO and high search engine rankings like crack cocaine. These Internet marketing companies knowing they've got these lawyers where they want them, deal them high search engine rankings for a portion of the fees earned.

I am sure some the Internet marketing companies get away with it saying we have a lawyer or law firm heading things up - just running a referral relationship or 'virtual law firm,' if you will. That's bunk. The Internet marketing company is greedy and is not willing to sell its services at a reasonable price in an straight forward fashion.

If the Internet marketing company's lawyer wants to earn legal fees, let them practice law. If they wish, they can go of counsel in a law firm and do their Internet marketing work.

Assuming you went to law school back when I did, could you imagine standing up in legal ethics class, and asking the professor 'Do you see any problem with me buying a large yellow page ad for personal injury work and paying the yellow page salesperson 30% of the fees I earn as a result?' Didn't think so. You'd have been embarrassed to ask.

As lawyers, let's not let our professionalism and ethics drop to lows we could not have imagined in law school. We owe to it ourselves and the public.

If such an Internet marketing company can provide a worthwhile service to lawyers, that's great. But build a business model around it that is commensurate with the traditions of our legal profession. Just because you can get away with something does not mean you should.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/4/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsToday we witnessed a slew of updates to client blogs that had been dormant for some time. To all you recent returnees, welcome back to the LexBlogosphere.

The discussion for October 4, 2007 includes these posts:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Google's speedy indexing of blogs

Darren Rowse posted this morning about the speed of Google indexing blogs. Indexing just means Google saving a blog post on Google servers and making it available in search results on a relevant search.

Darren found it took just 20 minutes for a recent post of his to show up on Google. Decided to test it out myself.

I posted on the 'State of UK law blogs' about a half hour ago. Just went to Google and searched for state of UK law blogs. Here's the #1 result.

UK law blogs

Not too shabby.

State of UK law blogs : October, 2007

Nick Holmes provides the state of UK law blogs, comparing where we were pre 2006 and where we are today.

Although a handful of UK law bloggers were active before 2006, it was only then that the UK blawgosphere started to take off. Since then, new law blogs have continued to appear at the rate of about one a week.

On infolaw I catalogue all known UK law blogs (plus a small number of notable overseas blawgs and blawg directory sites). Currently there are 132 listings (125 UK law blogs). More than half of these are hosted by Google's Blogger: 57 resolve to blogspot.com, 8 to wordpress.com and 8 to typepad.com; the remainder resolve to 57 other unique domains, though a number of these are nevertheless hosted by one of the big three blog services.

And the trends per Nick.

  • New law blogs appear at a steady rate - no great rush, but no significant falling-off either.
  • Those who have been blogging for a while are posting slightly less frequently.
  • Lawyers are tending to focus more on their core interests, with less posting about peripheral topics and less navel gazing.
  • For many, blogging is largely about self-satisfaction: getting it off their chest, stirring it up, getting feedback, learning from others.
  • Some use it more directly to promote their expertise and engage potential clients and associates.

As to future, Nick sees UK law blogs continuing to grow and blog-like functions increasingly incorporated into all websites. "Whatever your purpose, blogging is a form of networking, putting you in touch with new people, sharing new information and insights and (if you do it right) earning you kudos and new business."

Not every lawyer deserves a blog

"You shouldn't go around asking everyone and anyone if they want a blog. Blogs aren't candy. They're a tool." That from Pat Thornton, a new media journalist and Web developer, in explaining why not every journalist or reporter should have a blog. Applies equally well to lawyers.

Often editors go around asking who wants a blog, and will accept just about any idea for a blog from a staff member. Maybe they'll even allow them to have a blog with no real theme or vision. They'll allow those staffers to post about whatever.

That's what we call lack of a concrete strategy. People don't like blogs because they are blogs. People like blogs because of the content and the two-way communication.

People like bloggers who connect with them. People like blogs with a specific purpose that fills a niche. In short: people don't like random blogs.

Blogs are hip now. So legal marketing professionals and lawyers want a blog. They're not sure why, but others have them, their SEO consultant said they ought to get one, or a competitor law firm has one. Problem is that they do not want to take the time to learn what blogging really is and how they should use a blog as a reputation enhancer and client development tool.

Vision and mission is critical per Thorton.

You need to have a vision and plan to really make blogging work, and just adding blogs for the sake of having blogs does not impress anyone. Blogs are everywhere. Little kids to grand parents have blogs.

You need to offer a blog that others can't offer. You need to harness your niche, which should be owning the stories and news in your coverage area.

If you're a lawyer in Peoria wanting to grow a family practice, blog about divorce issues that connect with folks in Southern Illinois. Akin to Thorton's advice to reporters, "If you're a local newspaper, don't write about national issues that don't directly affect your readers."

And please, please don't expect your online journal (as a lawyer blog was described by one clueless lawyer at a recent conference) to get you any legal work. Couldn't say it better than Thorton, "...if people want to read random online journals they can easily go to MySpace or Live Journal."

And don't go for the cool factor before you've ever put your foot in the water on blogging.

Don't add features like blogs, pod casts, talk back, etc just because you heard other places were using them. Add them because it makes your coverage better in a meaningful way.

To paraphrase Thorton's conclusions in a law firm blog situation, a tool if used properly that can really augment your firm's marketing coverage. A tool used poorly can dilute your brand and hurt your standing with prospective clients and their influencers. When a law firm starts blog, it should have a clear vision of what it wants to accomplish with its lawyer bloggers. Everything then done on the blog should be done to further that mission and to better connect with the blogs target audience.

Source on post: Amy Gahran

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/3/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsLots of discussion occurring in the LexBlogosphere this morning, with more entries than usual by 10:45 a.m. Pacific.

The conversation taking place on October 3, 2007 includes:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/2/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsStill raining here in Seattle, which makes for a dreary first full academic week at SU (where I just began my senior year). Don't forget, bloggers: keep the content submissions coming...I'm checking e-mail constantly, and nothing will slip by undetected.

The discussion for October 2, 2007 includes:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Community bloggers offer lawyers networking opportunities

Just about every newspaper has incorporated bloggers into their online edition. Many are amateur journalists, as opposed reporters employed by the paper, who are blogging on matters of local interest. The bloggers are also often featured in the print edition of such papers

For example, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel urged its readers yesterday to check out their new community bloggers blogging on education issues. "The bloggers include teachers, students and parents, writing about any aspect of education that interests them."

These blogs are fertile ground for lawyer networking. They're a wonderful way for you to meet people in your community and for other people in your community to get to know you. They'll also find out you're a lawyer and the area in which you practice. When they or friend have a legal need, you may get a call.

How?

  • Go to your newspaper's online edition and look for all the blogs. Do not limit your selection to blogs that look like they may be discussing issues relevant to your practice. Lawyers get divorce work from participation in civic boards where at the meetings the subject of divorce is never discussed.
  • Set up an RSS feed to your newsreader for each of the blogs
  • Put the RSS feeds in one folder in your newsreader marked [name of paper] blogs.
  • Post comments on the blogs when you have an interest in the subject. Your comment will likely have nothing to do with your legal work. That's fine.
  • Put your name, the url address for your blog, and your email address in the fields available accompanying your comment.
  • Do not put your url, title, etc in the comment body itself. It will look like you are marketing your services and you will be disliked.
  • Subscribe to additional comments by RSS or email, if the blog offers it, so you're kept aware of continuing discussion. Otherwise, check back in a day or two.
  • The publishers of those blogs and their readers (there's often a ton of them) will see your comment and click on your name taking them to your blog. Curiosity will get them too click around your blog, in effect getting to know you and what you do.
  • Make valuable comments and people will appreciate your contributions and the time you are giving. You may well be blogged about on one of these blogs or other readers' own blogs.
  • Make sure you set up a Google Blog Search and Technorati search and accompanying RSS feed to your newsreader for your name, law firm name, and blog url. That way you'll know if others blog or write about you. Gives you the opportunity to comment at those blogs.
  • You'll receive opportunities to meet others giving of themselves to your community. These folks are often the influencers in your community - the type who influence people's opinions about good lawyers.

Heck, it's a lot of fun and does not take near the time of networking in the offline world. What are you waiting for?

Seattle attorney Bill Marler, wife's license plate featured in WSJ Law Blog (again)

Local food safety lawyer Bill Marler, whose Marler Clark offices are just a few blocks from the LexBlog headquarters here in Seattle, has again been featured in the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.

Today's update features news on the recent E. coli outbreak that prompted a major recall of American ground beef, and quotes USDA official Richard Raymond as saying America's meat supply is "the safest in the world."

Not true, Bill tells Peter Lattman:
“21,000,000 pounds of hamburger meat is recalled – that is 84,000,000 quarter-pound hamburgers – and Dr. Richard Raymond of the USDA says our meat supply ‘is the safest in the world?’” he said. “One would think that with hundreds of Americans poisoned that Dr. Raymond would not being the ‘cheerleader in chief’ for the beef industry but would be asking one simple question – ‘What is going on?’”
This marks the third time, by our count, that Lattman has featured Bill in an update...and the second time he's cited Mrs. Marler's "ECOLI" vanity license plate.

LexBlog Q & A: Francis Pileggi of the Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog

Today we mark the arrival of a new month by continuing our Five Questions feature  recently renamed the LexBlog Q & A where I interview important figures from the LexBlogosphere and beyond. Today's guest is Delaware lawyer and attorney Francis G.X. Pileggi, a Fox Rothschild attorney who maintains the Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog.

Francis, who has been receiving some solid media coverage in recent weeks, joins us to discuss how he got into blogging, his writing routine, advice for beginning bloggers and more.

1. Rob La Gatta: You started your blog nearly three years ago, at a time when legal blogs weren't as popular or widespread as they are today. Why did you decide to start blogging in the first place, and how familiar were you with how to write for blogs when your site first launched?

Francis Pileggi: I realized about three years ago, just before I started my blog, that more and more people were using the Internet to both find lawyers and to "find out about lawyers" and that it was, therefore, necessary to be able at least influence the "Internet presence" which might be the first and only way that people would be finding out about you (as opposed, for example, to Martindale-Hubbel in the past). I also noticed several blogs by partners at major law firms who were writing their own blogs without their firm's logo. I was not familiar with blogs at that time but I found Kevin, and he and his staff educated me on the finer points.

2. Rob La Gatta: You update your blog almost daily. Do you have a specific routine for blogging? Where do you write best – at home? In the office? Somewhere else?

Francis Pileggi: The most predictable time for me to blog is at night and on weekends, though if I receive notice of an important decision during the day, I sometimes will try to rearrange my schedule to at least post briefly about it, and come back later with more details. It is easiest for me to blog while at home at night after my family is sleeping.

3. Rob La Gatta: Do you keep track – either through Google Analytics, through comments in your blog, or otherwise – of where your readers are located? Are they mostly in Delaware, or spread across the country/world?

Francis Pileggi: Through the software that LexBlog provides, I do track the number and source of my visitors. There are many from Delaware, but most of the visitors to my blog seem to be lawyers and professors from around the country, and some from around the world.

4. Rob La Gatta: A recent article called you the “Dean of Delaware law bloggers.” Are there any other Delaware-based blogs that you’d recommend to readers?

Francis Pileggi: Over the last year or so there have been several new blogs by Delaware lawyers and others. I am hesitant to pick just one from among the many good law blogs in Delaware, but among the non-legal blogs I read is one on Delaware politics at DelawareGrapevine.com.

5. Rob La Gatta: What advice would you give to a lawyer – someone unfamiliar with blogging and why it is important – who was just starting their first blog?

Francis Pileggi: It should be a labor of love. It will be easiest for those who already write and publish often. If writing in general is a chore and does not come easily, then blogging is not for you. If you enjoy writing often, and have the time management skills to weave some amount of time each day for blogging into your schedule – even if it is for reading of materials for use on the blog, as opposed to actual writing – then you will find it to be a very rewarding experience and a positive return on your investment of time.
That's all for this week. Stay tuned for more LexBlog Q & A interviews - some of which will begin to move beyond LexBlog's clients to highlight major players from the greater legal blogosphere - in coming updates.

Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 10/1/07

Legal News - LexBlogosphere - Lawyer Blogs and BlawgsThis Monday marks the first day in October, and we at LexBlog have some exciting developments in store for the coming month. More on those as they come...

The discussion taking place on October 1, 2007 includes:
Don't forget...to stay up to date on news from our corner of the blogosphere, subscribe to our LexBlogosphere Daily News RSS Feed.

Findory is sadly going offline

FindoryOm Malik reports this morning that Seattle's Greg Linden, the founder of the news aggregation service, Findory, is shutting down the service on November 1.

Greg, an early believer in the personalization of news and info, had this to say from his personal blog.

Some day, online newspapers will focus on your interests, building you your own unique, customized front page of news. Some day, search engines will learn from what you do to help you find what you need. Some day, your computer will adapt to your needs to help with the task at hand. Some day, information overload will be tamed.

But not today. Findory will be shutting down on November 1. The website will no longer carry news, blogs, videos, podcasts, or favorites.

With Findory picking up my feeds and LexBlog client feeds for the last few years, I followed the aggregator with great interest. Thought there was good potential for the personalized syndication of law content via Findory. Even hoped there may some way to leverage the technology after Greg announced in January he was going to wind things up.

Greg's been one of the folks here in Seattle whose brain I would love to pick. Greg wrote the recommendation engine used by Amazon.com and later led the software team that developed Amazon's personalization systems. His vision of delivering the information people want from whom they wanted it was ahead of the times. Up for a cup of coffee Greg?