Header graphic for print
Real Lawyers Have Blogs On the topic of the law, firm marketing, social media, & baseball

New York lawyer advertising rules declared unconstitutional

We just got word from Greg Beck at the Public Citizen Litigation Group about an exciting court ruling that took place this afternoon in New York. A decision was handed down by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York stating that recently implemented lawyer advertising rules violate the First Amendment.

Below is the press release Greg sent our way a few minutes ago:

Public Citizen Wins Injunction Against Unconstitutional Rules

WASHINGTON, D.C. - New rules governing lawyer advertising that took effect in New York on Feb. 1 cannot be enforced because they violate the First Amendment right to free speech, according to a ruling issued today by a federal court in New York.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York ruled in favor of Public Citizen’s request for an injunction against many of the new rules. The organization represented its members and attorney James L. Alexander and his law firm, Alexander & Catalano. The New York firm was forced to change its advertisements to comply with the more restrictive rules.

The new guidelines were part of a revision of the rules contained in New York’s Code of Professional Responsibility for lawyers, which is designed to protect consumers by prohibiting false and misleading lawyer advertisements. Public Citizen contended in its lawsuit that the rules’ broad language unconstitutionally prohibited truthful communication of information about legal services to New York consumers. The court heard oral argument on June 18.

In a victory for First Amendment rights, the court permanently enjoined enforcement of most of the challenged rules against attorney advertising, including rules against attention-getting techniques, the use of nicknames and mottos, the use of client testimonials, the portrayal of judges and the use of Internet pop-up ads.

"The New York rules went too far in imposing burdensome restrictions on legal free speech that do not protect consumers," said Greg Beck, an attorney for Public Citizen who litigated the case. "The court rightly recognized that the First Amendment prevents states from arbitrarily restricting advertising just because some may find it distasteful."

In today’s ruling, the court held that the advertising at issue in the case was a form of speech protected by the First Amendment, and it categorically rejected New York’s argument that advertising considered by the state to be trivial or irrelevant was not covered by free speech rights. It noted that the state had not produced any evidence that its restrictions on speech were necessary to protect consumers and found that the prohibitions were much broader than necessary to accomplish the state’s claimed objectives.

Public Citizen also challenged the rules’ application to non-commercial speech, such as offers by lawyers to represent clients without a fee in civil rights cases. And in what amounted to another victory for free speech, the court construed the challenged amendments not to apply to nonprofit attorneys.

"The main beneficiaries of this decision are New York consumers," Beck said. "Truthful advertising promotes healthy competition between lawyers and allows the public to learn about their rights and available legal services."

Congratulations to Greg and the rest of the good folks over at the Public Citizen Litigation Group, without whom this landmark victory for lawyers everywhere – reversing rules that had only been on the books since February – would never have been possible.

  • http://www.personalbrandmarketing.com Vikram Rajan

    Some argue that more compliance leads to more ethical behavior. While some legislation can help, ultimately it our responsibility as professionals to market ourselves ethically. Likewise, it is our responsibility as consumers to be aware. In both ways, marketing your personal brand through a blog helps.
    Basically with these rules reversed in NY, it seems to me more personal brand marketing opportunities seem to be available (again):
    1. You can use testimonials from a client, with a pending case.
    2. You can use a nickname that affirms some kind of result. (Of course, be careful.)
    3. You can use a domain name that affirms some kind of result. (Ditto.)
    4. You can use an acted skit to illustrate your marketing message.
    5. You can advertise your hobbies & style to market your personal brand.
    I am not a lawyer.
    ~ Vikram Rajan
    PersonalBrandMarketing.com