<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Murderer appeals verdict alleging jurors influenced by blogs | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/06/articles/cool-stuff/murderer-appeals-verdict-alleging-jurors-influenced-by-blogs/</link>
<description>Jurors are only permitted to consider facts presented at trial. Accordingly, jurors are not allowed to read news or other accounts of the trial. We can now add blogs to televison, newspapers, and radio to the media we need to...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:26:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 12:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>simon.chapple@pintopotts.co.uk (PintoPotts)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not the first case of blogging having an impact on a trial and I doubt it will be the last, at the end of the day blogs contain information which can be viewed by anyone with a PC and internet connection, people should be careful not to publish or discuss sensitive information, in some cases it really can be more than your jobs worth.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/06/articles/cool-stuff/murderer-appeals-verdict-alleging-jurors-influenced-by-blogs/#742496</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/06/articles/cool-stuff/murderer-appeals-verdict-alleging-jurors-influenced-by-blogs/#742496</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:26:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
