<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Juror&apos;s blog voids conviction | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/06/articles/cool-stuff/jurors-blog-voids-conviction/</link>
<description>A California court of appeals has voided a conviction and resulting 36 year sentence because of a juror&apos;s blog. As reported by the AP: An unpublished opinion released Thursday by a three-judge panel of the 4th District Court of Appeals...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:38:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>jerry@leads4insurance.com (Jerry)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Concealing the fact that you are an attorney from a judge for jury selection?  Actually articulating that the jury instructions do not speak to blogging, as if that somehow gets him off the hook, is more than borderline ridiculous.  These comments can only lead one to believe this juror has bigger problems than an over inflated ego.  I hope he has a good retirement annuity plan in place because he may not have a license for a meaningful income for much longer.      </p>

<p>Jerry<br />
www.leads4insurance.com</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/06/articles/cool-stuff/jurors-blog-voids-conviction/#742493</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/06/articles/cool-stuff/jurors-blog-voids-conviction/#742493</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:38:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>