<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Employers should have blog policies : UK law firm | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/04/articles/cool-stuff/employers-should-have-blog-policies-uk-law-firm/</link>
<description>In light of a recent employee winning an unfair dismissal claim when fired for blogging, UK law firm, Hegarty Solicitors, is advising employers to cover blogs in their employment policies. From employment partner Tim Thompson: Employers should ensure they have...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:55:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 12:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Employers should keep in mind that policies restricting interactive employee communication can violate federal labor law -- whether your workforce is unionized or not.</p>

<p>Here are some articles disussing the broader topic: <a href="http://www.elinfonet.com/fedarticles/7/12" rel="nofollow">Employer Confidntiality Policies and the NLRA</a></p>

<p>Here is an example <a href="http://www.elinfonet.com/pickedpol/264.html" rel="nofollow">blogging policy</a>.</p>

<p>Hope that helps.</p>

<p>- Patrick</p>

<p>Patrick Della Valle<br />
Employment Law Information Network</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/04/articles/cool-stuff/employers-should-have-blog-policies-uk-law-firm/#742387</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/04/articles/cool-stuff/employers-should-have-blog-policies-uk-law-firm/#742387</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
