<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Absence of blogging from LegalTech speaks volumes | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/01/articles/cool-stuff/absence-of-blogging-from-legaltech-speaks-volumes/</link>
<description>Any technology conference these days, whether focused on blogs and RSS or not, is filled with attendees blogging live from conference sessions. Set up general keyword feeds or Technorati tag feeds for the conference&apos;s name and you&apos;ll receive regular summaries,...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:06:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 12:38:07 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>firm@harrismoure.com (China Law Blog)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin -- I completely agree with you.  We lawyers know that lawyers always lag behind on this sort of thing and they don't even realize it.  How many law firm websites brag about having an integrated computer network (whatever that means) as though anyone even cares any more?</p>

<p>I have live blogged from a few China law seminars and the lawyers there just think it is both the weirdest/coolest thing they've ever seen.  At a tech seminar it would, of course, be nothing.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/01/articles/cool-stuff/absence-of-blogging-from-legaltech-speaks-volumes/#742261</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2007/01/articles/cool-stuff/absence-of-blogging-from-legaltech-speaks-volumes/#742261</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:06:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
