<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Social network sites dedicated to lawyers? | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/10/articles/law-firm-marketing/social-network-sites-dedicated-to-lawyers/</link>
<description>I just received an email from Doug Neal on his Lawyer-Link. It&apos;s described as a &quot;Professional Networking Site for the Legal Community and was developed by Twelfth Floor, LLC., the Leader in Vertical Professional Networking Sites. Though still in beta,...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 05:59:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:20:58 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>aflusche@gmail.com (Andrew Flusche)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that networking sites exclusively for lawyers won't do so hot.  In my opinion, why would we want that?  Don't lawyers need to networking with people outside the profession as well?  Why not use something that draws in lawyers <em>and</em> non-lawyers?</p>

<p>One tool I have been experimenting with lately is <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/" rel="nofollow">LinkedIn</a>, which I wrote about <a href="http://www.legalandrew.com/2006/10/17/linkedin-can-network-lawyers-to-each-other-and-to-clients/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  This seems to be the kind-of tool that lawyers need, along with blogs and RSS.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/10/articles/law-firm-marketing/social-network-sites-dedicated-to-lawyers/#742072</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/10/articles/law-firm-marketing/social-network-sites-dedicated-to-lawyers/#742072</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 05:59:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
