<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on New York legal blog restrictions a fraud on consumers | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/09/articles/law-firm-marketing/new-york-legal-blog-restrictions-a-fraud-on-consumers/</link>
<description>Greg Beck, at Public Citizen&apos;s new Consumer Law and Public Policy Blog, posts that New York&apos;s proposed restrictions on lawyer advertisements, including blogs, hurt consumers. The real reason for the restrictions is to keep legal work in the hands of...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:39:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:21:44 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>dhowell@gmail.com (Denise Howell)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe the response deadline was 9/15.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/09/articles/law-firm-marketing/new-york-legal-blog-restrictions-a-fraud-on-consumers/#742005</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/09/articles/law-firm-marketing/new-york-legal-blog-restrictions-a-fraud-on-consumers/#742005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:45:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>kevin@lexblog.com (Kevin OKeefe)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>That's what I thought but Greg Beck posted at Public Citizen's Consumer Law and Public Policy Blog that he heard the date was extended to 11/15.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/09/articles/law-firm-marketing/new-york-legal-blog-restrictions-a-fraud-on-consumers/#742006</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/09/articles/law-firm-marketing/new-york-legal-blog-restrictions-a-fraud-on-consumers/#742006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:39:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
