<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on None of top five law firms using blogs &amp; RSS | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/</link>
<description>The annual Vault.com rankings of Big law firms are out. As far as I know, none of the top five, Wachtell, Cravath, Sullivan &amp; Cromwell, Skadden, and Davis Polk, are using blogs and RSS for marketing purposes. Will be interesting...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:20:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:28:06 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>iratschko@gmail.com (Imke Ratschko)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think very few of the top one hundred law firms use RSS.  I once went through about 5O websites (before I got tired) and could only find one RSS stream offered by Wilmer Hale.  They all have pretty good content, but how am I supposed to find it or be reminded of new content?  Is it just plain ignorance or what?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/#741963</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/#741963</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:49:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>dgulbran@yahoo.com (Dave!)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ignorance? Maybe indifference. Does Cravath really need a blog to generate business or for client relations? I'm sure they have clients who would find the technology helpful, but I'm also sure they many clients who could care less.</p>

<p>If you're paying the premium of representation from a firm of that size, you probably are expecting a different type of service, more personal attention. (That isn't to say you're getting it... you probably aren't.) It reminds me of a client I had back in my video production days who _refused_ to make training videos or computer based training. Why? Because for the types of clients they had, they didn't *want* technology. They wanted *face time*.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/#741964</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/#741964</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>sierraspencer@gmail.com (Sierra Spencer)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Blogging, it seems has been adopte dbest by tech companies, and the way things are going the remaining industries will have to follow.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/#741965</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/08/articles/large-law/none-of-top-five-law-firms-using-blogs-rss/#741965</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:20:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>