<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on Blogosphere not credible? | Real Lawyers Have Blogs</title>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/</link>
<description>Stephen Baker of BusinessWeek explained the blogosphere to Steven Straight following Straight&apos;s comment on Heather Green&apos;s post warning that the blogosphere is losing credibility. Stephen on the blogosphere&apos;s credibility: If you take a walk around the block and come across...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 23:09:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:29:20 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<author>dcanton@harrisonpensa.com (David Canton)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The "losing credibility", "stupid blogs" thought is addressed in Chris Anderson's (editor of Wired magazine) book called "The Long Tail" that is about to be published. </p>

<p>I read an advance copy on the weekend.  (See my comments at <a href="http://www.canton.elegal.ca/archives/2006/07/#a000788" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.canton.elegal.ca/archives/2006/07/#a000788" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.canton.elegal.ca/archives/2006/07/#a000788" rel="nofollow">http://www.canton.elegal.ca/archives/2006/07/#a000788</a></a></a> )</p>

<p>Chris makes the point that of the huge amount of amateur content (whether that be music, videos, blogs or whatever), only certain parts will appeal to certain people.  With rare exception they are not top 40 material.  </p>

<p>The point however is that "post-filters" such as search engines, user recommendations, reviews, and other blogs help each of us find and separate what is useful to each of us.</p>

<p>As far as "losing" credibility goes, my observation is that blogs started out as a form of personal geek diary, for lack of a better term.  Over time they have been adopted for strategic value, and have gained credibility.  Again, the issue is how we use the available tools to find the useful ones</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/#741796</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/#741796</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 14:03:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>steven.streight@gmail.com (vaspers the grate)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You guys are stupid mother fuckers.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/#741797</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/#741797</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<author>kevin@lexblog.com (Kevin O&apos;Keefe)</author>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gee Steven, could we draw you out on how you feel?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/#741798</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevin.lexblog.com/2006/07/articles/blog-basics/blogosphere-not-credible/#741798</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 23:09:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>