Blogosphere not credible?

Stephen Baker of BusinessWeek explained the blogosphere to Steven Straight following Straight's comment on Heather Green's post warning that the blogosphere is losing credibility.

Stephen on the blogosphere's credibility:

If you take a walk around the block and come across a group of raving harebrains, do you worry that the credibility of the street is at risk? If you're like me, you figure you ran into the wrong crowd. Maybe next stroll you should try a different neighborhood. But the point is that it's the people you run into that have or lack credibility. The street, like the blogosphere, just happens to be where you find them.

And on Straight's allegation that the blogosphere is filling up with boring or stupid blogs:

The great thing about the blog world is that unlike libraries or book stores, it never fills up. There's room for everyone. And if even 1% of the blogs is worth reading, it's still a gold mine. (And you can bet that marketers and social scientists will squeeze some interpretive value out of those other 99%.)

The bologosphere is credible as all get out. Put something out there that's off base. People, seen by thousands, will jump all over you. More credible than the offline world.

Don't get left behind, get your own blog

Lexblog

Become a part of the conversation

LexBlog creates and maintains professional, turn-key blogs for law firms and businesses. For more information fill out and send this form or call 1 800 913-0988.

all information is required please
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://kevin.lexblog.com/admin/trackback/44136
Comments (3)Subscribe to Comments on this Entry Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
David Canton - July 4, 2006 2:03 PM

The "losing credibility", "stupid blogs" thought is addressed in Chris Anderson's (editor of Wired magazine) book called "The Long Tail" that is about to be published.

I read an advance copy on the weekend. (See my comments at http://www.canton.elegal.ca/archives/2006/07/#a000788 )

Chris makes the point that of the huge amount of amateur content (whether that be music, videos, blogs or whatever), only certain parts will appeal to certain people. With rare exception they are not top 40 material.

The point however is that "post-filters" such as search engines, user recommendations, reviews, and other blogs help each of us find and separate what is useful to each of us.

As far as "losing" credibility goes, my observation is that blogs started out as a form of personal geek diary, for lack of a better term. Over time they have been adopted for strategic value, and have gained credibility. Again, the issue is how we use the available tools to find the useful ones

vaspers the grate - July 9, 2006 10:30 PM

You guys are stupid mother fuckers.

Kevin O'Keefe - July 9, 2006 11:09 PM

Gee Steven, could we draw you out on how you feel?

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.