Header graphic for print
Real Lawyers Have Blogs On the topic of the law, firm marketing, social media, & baseball

Wanna buy an ad on my nose?

Jeff Jarvis asks ‘Wanna buy an ad on my nose?‘ after seeing Hearst’s Shop Etc. magazine is turning its cover into an ad.

That’s a line crossed, but many others have been tickling that line for sometime now. The New York Times is putting ads on the front of its business section and not ruling out ads on its cover. Sometime ago, I noted that AM New York was turning its front page into an ad, using the distribution power they’d built to make more money — which it could do because it is free and didn’t need to use the front page to sell copies. Hearst is likewise sending its adcover to subscribers who’ve already bought the thing. These are desperate moves by publishers dying to eke out more bucks and they are victories for advertisers who always want to get closer to the publishers’ brands. But, of course, the more that advertisers take over those brands, the less those brands stand for.

Blog publishers should take a lesson from these publishers. Don’t sell your blog out for what most of you will mean beer money. Not saying you drink a lot of beer. Saying that your ad revenue will amount to a couple pints a month, if that.

  • http://www.HowToMakeItRain.com RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com

    COUNTERPOINT:
    Smart advertisors seek to match the message to the audience so that readers, viewers or listeners will actually appreciate the ad as a resource rather than an intrusion. (hint to all the lawyers out there who are advertising)
    Of course, there are plenty of advertisors who aren’t that smart. And enough owners of various media who will sell space or time to the highest bidder regardless of what the ad for a rental car on a lawyer’s blog does to the perception of the blog’s value as a resource.
    But to just state “advertising on your blog is bad” is not only too crude a cut to make, but also a bit ironic since you yourself had advertising on yours (Lex Blog/MyMSN/Yahoo/Newsgator/and of course all the other blogs you make us aware of)
    Please note that I am NOT criticizing you for having ads on your blog. The right ads contribute to a reader’s experience & you have obviously taken care to ensure that the ads which appear are relevant & can make a contribution to (our) experience. What I am criticizing is the blunt line between good & bad that you draw.
    Respectfully,
    RJON ROBINS
    http://www.HowToMakeItRain.com
    Dedicated To Helping Lawyers In Small Firms Make ALOT More Money

  • http://www.HowToMakeItRain.com RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com

    COUNTERPOINT:
    Smart advertisors seek to match the message to the audience so that readers, viewers or listeners will actually appreciate the ad as a resource rather than an intrusion. (hint to all the lawyers out there who are advertising)
    Of course, there are plenty of advertisors who aren’t that smart. And enough owners of various media who will sell space or time to the highest bidder regardless of what the ad for a rental car on a lawyer’s blog does to the perception of the blog’s value as a resource.
    But to just state “advertising on your blog is bad” is not only too crude a cut to make, but also a bit ironic since you yourself had advertising on yours (Lex Blog/MyMSN/Yahoo/Newsgator/and of course all the other blogs you make us aware of)
    Please note that I am NOT criticizing you for having ads on your blog. The right ads contribute to a reader’s experience & you have obviously taken care to ensure that the ads which appear are relevant & can make a contribution to (our) experience. What I am criticizing is the blunt line between good & bad that you draw.
    Respectfully,
    RJON ROBINS
    http://www.HowToMakeItRain.com
    Dedicated To Helping Lawyers In Small Firms Make ALOT More Money